Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrantxý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x
ýDefinitive Proxy Statement

¨Definitive Additional Materials

¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

The Kraft Heinz Company

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x
ýNo fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:




Table of Contents

The Kraft Heinz Company
200 East Randolph Street
Suite 7600
Chicago, Illinois 60601
March 3, 2017

kraftheinzgraylogo.jpg

THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY

ONE PPG PLACE

PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15222

March 3, 2016



Dear Fellow Stockholders:

I am pleased to invite you to our 20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Thursday,Wednesday, April 21, 201619, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. EDT at the Offices of Reed Smith LLP located at 225 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15222.

The accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement provide details about the meeting, including instructions on registering ahead of time in order to attend the meeting.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote by telephone, by Internet or by signing, dating and returning your proxy card by mail. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, and management of The Kraft Heinz Company, thank you for your commitment to The Kraft Heinz Company.


Sincerely,

LOGO

alexandrebehring.jpg
Alexandre Behring

Chairman of the Board



Table of Contents


THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY

One PPG Place

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222

200 East Randolph Street, Suite 7600
Chicago, Illinois 60601

NOTICE OF 20162017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TIME AND DATE:

11:00 a.m. EDT on Thursday,Wednesday, April 21, 2016.19, 2017.


PLACE:

Offices of Reed Smith LLP
225 Fifth Ave.,
Pittsburgh, PA 15222

225 Fifth Ave.,

Pittsburgh, PA 15222


ITEMS OF BUSINESS:

(1)

To elect all director nominees named in the Proxy Statement to one-year terms expiring in 2017;

2018;

 (2)

To hold an advisory vote to approve executive compensation;

 (3)

To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of an executive compensation vote;

(4)

To approve The Kraft Heinz Company 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan;

(5)

To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for 2016; and

2017;

 (6)(4)

To vote on three shareholder proposals, if properly presented; and

(5)To transact any other business properly presented at the meeting.


WHO MAY VOTE:

Stockholders of record at the close of business on February 22, 2016.21, 2017.


WHO MAY ATTEND:

If you would like to attend the Annual Meeting, you must be a stockholder on the record date and obtain an admission ticket in advance. For details on attending the Annual Meeting, see Question 19 on page 5344 of the Proxy Statement.


DATE OF DISTRIBUTION:

We mailed our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about March 3, 2016.2017. For stockholders who previously elected to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, we mailed the Proxy Statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3,December 31, 2016 and the proxy card on or about March 3, 2016.2017.


March 3, 2017  LOGO
jamesjsavinaa01.jpg
March 3, 2016  

James J. Savina

Senior Vice President, Global General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary


IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY

MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 21, 2016

19, 2017

The Kraft Heinz Company’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K

are available athttps://materials.proxyvote.com/500754



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 Page
Page 

 1 

 3 

 3 

 10 

10

PROPOSAL 4. APPROVAL OF THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

11

PROPOSAL 5. RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 18 

 19 

 19 

 19 

 20 

 20 

 23 

 24 

 24 

 24 

 25 

 25 

 25 

 28 

 29 

 31 

 32 

 33 

 35 

 41 

 41 

 42 

 43 

  
44
 

i

Table of Contents

PENSION BENEFITS TABLE

44

 44 

 45 

 47 

 49 

 49 

 54 

APPENDIX A

A-1 

i




ii



PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This is not a complete description, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

ANNUAL MEETING

Time and Date

 11:00 a.m. EDT on Tuesday,Wednesday, April 21, 201619, 2017

Place

 Offices of Reed Smith LLP, 225 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Record Date

 February 22, 201621, 2017

Voting

 Stockholders as of the Record Date are entitled to one vote per share on each matter to be voted upon at the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”).

Admission

 If you plan to attend the meeting, you must be a stockholder of record on the Record Date and obtain an admission ticket in advance as described in Question 19 on page 5344 of this Proxy Statement. As space is limited, it is mandatory that you obtain a ticket in advance.

VOTING PROPOSALS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATION

Proposal

Board
Recommendation
Page
Reference
   

Board
Recommendation

Page
Reference

Proposal 1 –

Election of Directors For all nominees 3

Proposal 2 –

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation For 109

Proposal 3 –

Advisory Vote on the Frequency of an Executive Compensation VoteFor “1 Year”10

Proposal 4 –

Approval of The Kraft Heinz Company 2016 Omnibus Incentive PlanFor11

Proposal 5 –

Ratification of the Selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Auditors for 20162017 For 189
Proposal 4 –Shareholder Proposal: Resolution Related to Sustainability and NutritionAgainst21
Proposal 5 –Shareholder Proposal: Resolution Related to PackagingAgainst22
Proposal 6 –Shareholder Proposal: Resolution Related to DeforestationAgainst23

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The table below provides summary information about each director nominee as of February 22, 2016.

Name

 

Age

 

Director
Since

 

Occupation and Experience

 

Independent

 

Audit

 

Comp

 

Gov

 

Ops &
Strat

Gregory E. Abel

 53 2013 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Berkshire Hathaway Energy Yes    X

Alexandre Behring (Chairman)

 49 2013 Founding Partner, Managing Partner and Board Member, 3G Capital Yes  Chair Chair X

Warren E. Buffett

 85 2013 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Yes    

John T. Cahill
(Vice Chairman)

 58 2015 Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Kraft Foods Group, Inc. No    Chair

Tracy Britt Cool

 31 2013 Chief Executive Officer, The Pampered Chef Yes    

Jeanne P. Jackson

 64 2015 President, Product and Merchandising, NIKE, Inc. Yes X  X 

Jorge Paulo Lemann

 76 2013 Founding Partner and Board Member, 3G Capital Yes  X X 

Mackey J. McDonald

 69 2015 Senior Advisor, Crestview Partners Yes X X  

John C. Pope

 66 2015 Chairman, PFI Group, LLC Yes Chair  X 

Marcel Herrmann Telles

 65 2013 Founding Partner and Board Member, 3G Capital Yes  X X 

18, 2017.
Name Age 
Director
Since
 Occupation and Experience Independent Audit Comp Gov 
Ops &
Strat
Gregory E. Abel 54 2013 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Berkshire Hathaway Energy Yes       X
Alexandre Behring (Chairman) 50 2013 Founding Partner, Managing Partner and Board Member, 3G Capital Yes   Chair Chair X
Tracy Britt Cool 32 2013 Chief Executive Officer, The Pampered Chef Yes        
Warren E. Buffett 86 2013 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Yes        
John T. Cahill (Vice Chairman) 59 2015 Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Kraft Foods Group, Inc. No       Chair
Feroz Dewan 40 2016 Chief Executive Officer, Arena Holdings Management Yes X      
Jeanne P. Jackson 65 2015 President and Strategic Advisor, NIKE, Inc. Yes X   X  
Jorge Paulo Lemann 77 2013 Founding Partner and Board Member, 3G Capital Yes   X X  
Mackey J. McDonald 70 2015 Senior Advisor, Crestview Partners Yes X X    
John C. Pope 67 2015 Chairman, PFI Group, LLC Yes Chair   X  
Marcel Herrmann Telles 66 2013 Founding Partner and Board Member, 3G Capital Yes   X X  



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SUMMARY

Consistent with the provisions of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and related U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, we are asking our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (as defined in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” (the “CD&A”) beginning on page 35)28). This “say-on-pay” vote is not intended to address any specific item of our compensation program, but rather to address our overall approach to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement.

The Board of Directors of The Kraft Heinz Company (“Kraft Heinz,” “we” or “us”), primarily through the Compensation Committee, spends considerable effort defining and overseeing Kraft Heinz’s executive compensation program. Our compensation program is based on a pay-for-performance philosophy and designed to accomplish the following goals:

Reward superior financial and operational performance;

Place a significant portion of compensation at risk if performance goals are not achieved;

Align the interests of the Named Executive Officers with those of our stockholders; and

Enable us to attract, retain and motivate top talent.

As described in further detail in the CD&A below, consistent with these goals, our compensation program has been designed with a view toward linking a significant portion of the compensation of each Named Executive Officer to company and individual performance and the growth in the value of Kraft Heinz. Please read the CD&A beginning on page 35 and related “Executive Compensation Tables” beginning on page 41 for additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about our Named Executive Officers’ fiscal year 20152016 compensation.

FREQUENCY OF VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Section 14A of the Exchange Act and related SEC rules also enable our stockholders to indicate how frequently they want to vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. We ask that our stockholders cast an advisory (non-binding) vote on how frequently we should have such votes in the future. Our Board recommends that stockholders vote to annually approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

APPROVAL OF THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

AUDITORS
We are asking our stockholders to approve The Kraft Heinz Company 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which was adopted by our Board in February 2016 and we believe furthers our pay-for-performance philosophy and executive compensation goals described above.

AUDITORS

As a matter of good governance, we arealso asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending January 1,December 30, 2017.



COMPANY PROPOSALS

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Director Nomination and Qualification

Prior to July 2, 2015, primarily all of our common stock was owned by Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (“Berkshire Hathaway”) and 3G Global Food Holdings, LP (“3G Global Food Holdings”, and together with its affiliates, “3G Capital”) following their acquisition of H.J. Heinz Company on June 7, 2013. On July 2, 2015, through a series of transactions, we consummated the merger of Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (“Kraft”) with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of H.J. Heinz Holding Corporation (“Heinz”) (the “2015 Merger”). At the closing of the 2015 Merger, Heinz was renamed The Kraft Heinz Company and all outstanding shares of Kraft common stock (other than deferred shares and restricted shares) were converted into the right to receive, on a one-for-one basis, shares of Kraft Heinz common stock.Company. Following the 2015 Merger, we became a public company listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”). Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital continue to hold a majority of our outstanding shares. See “Ownership of Equity Securities” for further information about their respective stock ownership.

In connection with the 2015 Merger, Kraft and Heinz agreed on the selection of directors to serve on the initial Board of Directors of Kraft Heinz (the “Board” or the “Board of Directors”) upon the closing of the 2015 Merger, as follows:

including the following Director nominees:

Messrs. Behring, Lemann and Telles (each of whom was selected by 3G Global Food Holdings);

Messrs. Abel and Buffett and Ms. Cool (each of whom was selected by Berkshire Hathaway); and

Messrs. Cahill, Cox, McDonald and Pope and Ms. Jackson (each of whom was selected by Kraft).

The parties to the 2015 Merger also agreed that Mr. Behring would serve as Chairman and Mr. Cahill as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors.

There were no other agreements between Kraft and Heinz regarding the selection of directors of Kraft Heinz following the merger. Upon the closing of the 2015 Merger, 3G Capital and Berkshire Hathaway entered into a shareholders’ agreement that governs how each party and theirits affiliates will vote the shares of Kraft Heinz common stock held by them with respect to supporting certain directors who are nominated by the Board and designated for support by either 3G Global Food Holdings or Berkshire Hathaway. See “Certain“Corporate Governance and Board Matters — Independence and Related Person Transactions — Certain Relationships and Transactions with Related Persons —Shareholders’ Agreement” for further information.

The

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Governance Committee”), the Board appointed Mr. Dewan as a member of ourthe Board effective October 21, 2016 to fill a vacancy created in connection with the retirement of DirectorsL. Kevin Cox on April 21, 2016.
The Governance Committee is responsible for identifying, evaluating and recommending to the Board nominees for election at the Annual Meeting. The Governance Committee relies on nominee suggestions from the directors, stockholders, management and others. From time to time, the Governance Committee may retain executive search and board advisory firms to assist in identifying and evaluating potential nominees. The Governance Committee believes that the current size and composition of the Board is appropriate, giving us the combined expertise of former officers or directors from each of Kraft and Heinz, as well as a diverse set of perspectives around the boardroom. Our current Board of Directors is also appropriately sized to allow effective committee organization and to facilitate efficient meetings and decision-making. In February 2016,January 2017, the Governance Committee recommended and the Board nominated each director for re-election to the Board of Directors.

On February 11, 2016, Kevin Cox informed us that he will not stand for re-election due to other commitments and will step down from the Board at the time of the Annual Meeting. As of the date of

this Proxy Statement, the Governance Committee is identifying and evaluating potential candidates to fill the vacancy created by Mr. Cox’s decision to not stand for re-election. Upon completion of the evaluation and nomination process described above, the Governance Committee expects to recommend a candidate to the full Board for consideration to fill this vacancy.

General Qualifications

The Board believes all directors should possess certain personal characteristics, including integrity, sound business judgment and vision, to serve on our Board. We believe these characteristics are necessary to establish a competent, ethical and well-functioning Board that best represents the interests of our business, stockholders, employees, business partners and consumers. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), when evaluating the suitability of individuals for nomination, the Governance Committee takes into account many factors. These factors include: the individual’s general understanding of the varied disciplines relevant to the success of a large, publicly traded company in today’s business environment; understanding of Kraft Heinz’s businesses and markets; professional expertise and background; and other factors that promote diversity of views and experience. The Governance Committee also considers an individual’s ability to devote sufficient time and effort to fulfill his or her Kraft Heinz responsibilities, taking into account the individual’s other commitments. In addition, the Board considers whether an individual meets various independence requirements, including whether his or her service on boards and committees of other organizations is consistent with our conflicts of interest policy.


When determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the Governance Committee also considers the director’s attendance at Board and committee meetings and participation in, and contributions to, Board and committee activities.

Diversity

The Guidelines provide that the Governance Committee will consider factors that promote diversity of views and experience when evaluating the suitability of individuals for nomination. While we have no formal written policy regarding what specific factors would create a diversity of views and experience, the Governance Committee believes that diversity offers a significant benefit to the Board and Kraft Heinz, as varying viewpoints contribute to a more informed and effective decision-making process. The Governance Committee seeks broad experience in relevant industries, professions and areas of expertise important to our operations, including manufacturing, marketing, technology, finance and accounting. As shown below under “ — Individual Skills and Experience,” the director nominees have varied experiences, backgrounds and personal characteristics, which ensure that the Board will have diverse viewpoints, enabling it to effectively represent our business, stockholders, employees, business partners and consumers.

Individual Skills and Experience

When evaluating potential director nominees, the Governance Committee considers each individual’s professional expertise and educational background in addition to the general qualifications. The Governance Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole. The Governance Committee works with the Board to determine the appropriate mix of backgrounds and experiences that would establish and maintain a Board that is strong in its collective knowledge, allowing the Board to fulfill its responsibilities and best perpetuate our long-term success and represent our stockholders’ interests. To help the Governance Committee determine whether director nominees qualify to serve on our Board and would contribute to the Board’s current and future needs, director nominees complete questionnaires regarding their backgrounds, qualifications, skills and potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, the Governance Committee conducts an annual evaluation of the Board to assess the experience, skills, qualifications, diversity and contributions of each individual and of the Board as a whole.

The Governance Committee regularly communicates with the Board to identify characteristics, professional experience and areas of expertise that will help meet specific Board needs, including:

significant operating experience as current or former executives, which provides directors with specific insight into, and expertise that will foster active participation in, the development and implementation of our operating plan and business strategy;

consumer products and retail industry knowledge, which is vital in understanding and reviewing our strategy;

leadership experience, as directors who have served in significant leadership positions possess strong abilities to motivate and manage others and to identify and develop leadership qualities in others;

accounting and financial expertise, which enables directors to analyze our financial statements, capital structure and complex financial transactions and oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes;

product development and marketing experience in complementary industries, which contributes to our identification and development of food and beverage products and implementation of marketing strategies that will improve our performance; and

public company board and corporate governance experience at large, publicly traded global companies, which provides directors with a solid understanding of their extensive and complex oversight responsibilities and furthers our goals of greater transparency, accountability for management and the Board and protection of stockholder interests.

significant operating experience as current or former executives, which provides directors with specific insight into, and expertise that will foster active participation in, the development and implementation of our operating plan and business strategy;
consumer products and retail industry knowledge, which is vital in understanding and reviewing our strategy;
leadership experience, as directors who have served in significant leadership positions possess strong abilities to motivate and manage others and to identify and develop leadership qualities in others;
accounting and financial expertise, which enables directors to analyze our financial statements, capital structure and complex financial transactions and oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes;
product development and marketing experience in complementary industries, which contributes to our identification and development of food and beverage products and implementation of marketing strategies that will improve our performance; and
public company board and corporate governance experience at large, publicly traded global companies, which provides directors with a solid understanding of their extensive and complex oversight responsibilities and furthers our goals of greater transparency, accountability for management and the Board and protection of stockholder interests.

The following table highlights each director nominee’s specific skills, knowledge and experiences. A particular director may possess additional skills, knowledge or experience even though they are not indicated below.

Director

  Operating  Industry  Leadership  
Accounting
and
Financial
  
Product
Development
and
Marketing
  
Public
Company
Board/
Corporate
Governance

Alexandre Behring (Chairman)

  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü    Öü

John T. Cahill (Vice Chairman)

  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü

Gregory E. Abel

  Öü    Öü  Öü    ü

Tracy Britt Cool

üüüü
Warren E. Buffett

  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü    Öü

Tracy Britt Cool

Feroz Dewan
 Öü Ö Öü ü Ö ü

Jeanne P. Jackson

  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü

Jorge Paulo Lemann

  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü

Mackey J. McDonald

  Öü  Öü  Öü    Öü  Öü

John C. Pope

  Öü    Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü

Marcel Herrmann Telles

  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü  Öü

The Board believes that all the director nominees are highly qualified. As the table above and biographies below show, the director nominees have significant leadership and professional experience, knowledge and skills that qualify them for service on our Board. As a group, they represent diverse views, experiences and backgrounds. All director nominees satisfy the criteria set forth in our Guidelines and possess the experience, skills and qualities to fully perform his or her duties as a director and contribute to our success.

The Governance Committee recommended, and the Board nominated, each of the director nominees listed below for election at the Annual Meeting. All directors are standing for election as directors to hold office for a one-year term expiring at the 20172018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified. The following presents information regarding each

director nominee as of February 22, 2016,18, 2017, including information about the director’s professional experience, public company directorships held and qualifications.

The persons named as proxies in the proxy card or electronic voting form will vote the shares represented by the proxy card or electronic voting form FOR or AGAINST the director nominees or ABSTAIN from voting, as instructed in the proxy card or electronic voting form. If a director nominee should become unavailable to serve as a director, an event that we do not anticipate occurring prior to or at the Annual Meeting, the persons designated as proxies intend to vote the shares for the person whom the Board may designate to replace that nominee. In lieu of naming a substitute, the Board may reduce the number of directors on our Board.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR EACH NOMINEE.

Gregory E. Abel

Age: 53

54

Mr. Abel has served on our Board since June 2013. Mr. Abel has served on the Berkshire Hathaway Energy Board (since 2000), and has served as Chairman (since 2011), Chief Executive Officer (since 2008) and President (since 1998). Berkshire Hathaway Energy is an electrica diversified global holding company that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses in the Unites States, Canada, Great Britain and natural gas service provider with more than 11.5 million customers worldwide.the Philippines. The Berkshire Hathaway Energy energy-related businesses include AltaLink, L.P., BHE Pipeline Group, BHE Renewables, BHE U.S. Transmission, HomeServices of America, Inc., MidAmerican Energy Company, Northern Powergrid Holdings Company, NV Energy, Inc. and PacifiCorp. Mr. Abel serves as Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer and Director of PacifiCorp;PacifiCorp, as Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of CE Casecnan Ltd., as Chairman and Director of Northern Natural Gas Company, Northern Powergrid Holdings Company and NV Energy, Inc., and as Director of AltaLink Management Ltd. and HomeServices of America, Inc.

Mr. Abel currently serves on the board and executive committee of the Edison Electric Institute. He also serves as a director on theDirector and Vice Chairman of Edison Electric Institute, an association of U.S. investor-owned electric companies and AEGIS Insurance Services, Inc., a mutual insurance company, and serves on the Board of Directors for Kum & Go, L.C., a convenience store chain, and Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited, boarda mutual insurance company of directors.

nuclear power facilities.


Mr. Abel has experience as a chief executive officer and director of multiple energy companies. Due to his service as a director in a highly-regulated industry and his management experience, he provides the Board with strong regulatory and operational skills.

skills, including international experience.

Alexandre Behring (Chairman)

Age: 49

50

Mr. Behring has served on our Board as Chairman since June 2013. Mr. Behring is a Founding Partner and has been Managing Partner and a Board Member of 3G Capital, a global investment firm, since 2004. He also serves as the Executive Chairman of the Board of Restaurant Brands International Inc., the parent company of Burger King and Tim Hortons, quick service restaurant companies, since October 2014,2014. Previously, he had served on the Board of Directors of Burger King Worldwide, Inc. and its predecessor as chairman from October 2010 until December 2014. He has also served as a director of Anheuser-Busch Inbev, a global brewer, since April 2014.

Previously, Mr. Behring spent 10 years at GP Investments, one of Latin America’s premier private-equity firms, including eight years as a partner and member of the firm’s Investment Committee. He served for seven years, from 1998 through 2004, as Chief Executive Officer of America Latina Logistica (“ALL”), Latin America’s largest railroad and logistics company. He served as a director of ALL until December 2011. From July 2008 to May 2011, Mr. Behring served as a director of CSX Corporation, a U.S. rail-based transportation company.

Mr. Behring’s extensive leadership experience in developing and operating both public and private companies brings an important perspective and ability to lead and motivate. Mr. Behring’s particular qualifications and operational, financial, logistics and strategic skills strengthen the Board’s collective knowledge and capabilities.

Tracy Britt Cool
Age: 32
Ms. Cool has served on our Board since June 2013. Ms. Cool has served as Chief Executive Officer of The Pampered Chef, a direct seller of high-quality cooking tools, since November 2014. Ms. Cool joined Berkshire Hathaway, The Pampered Chef’s parent company, in December 2009 as Financial Assistant to the Chairman. Ms. Cool is currently the Chairman of Benjamin Moore & Co., a leading manufacturer and retailer of paints and architectural coatings (since June 2012), Chairman of Larson-Juhl, a manufacturer and distributor of wood and metal framing products (since January 2012), and Chairman of Oriental Trading Company, a direct merchant of party suppliers, arts and crafts, toys and novelties (since November 2012).
Ms. Cool has experience as chairman of several Berkshire Hathaway subsidiaries, as well as insight into financial, investment and other complex subjects.
Warren E. Buffett

Age: 85

86

Mr. Buffett has served on our Board since June 2013. Mr. Buffett has served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Berkshire Hathaway, a diversified holding company, since 1970.

Mr. Buffett brings over 4345 years of experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of publicly traded and private companies, providing the Board with a strong background in finance, investing and other complex subjects. His extensive experience in investing and building companies provides the Board with strong leadership and an investor’s perspective. Mr. Buffett has significant investment experience, including the evaluation of strategic opportunities and challenges of Kraft Heinz’s business and our competitive and financial position, as well as experience in public and private company financial reporting practices.

Mr. Buffett has pledged all of his Berkshire Hathaway shares, representing 99% of his net worth, to philanthropic endeavors.


John T. Cahill

(Vice Chairman)

Age: 58

59

Mr. Cahill has served on our Board as Vice Chairman since July 2, 2015, prior to which he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Kraft since December 28, 2014. Mr. Cahill previously served as Kraft’s non-executive Chairman from March 8, 2014 to December 2014. Prior to that, he served as Kraft’s Executive Chairman since October 1, 2012. Mr. Cahill joined Mondelēz International, Inc. (“Mondelēz International”), a food and beverage company and Kraft’s former parent, on January 2, 2012 as the Executive Chairman Designate, North American Grocery, and served in that capacity until the spin-off of Kraft from Mondelēz International in October 2012. Prior to that, he served as an Industrial Partner at Ripplewood Holdings LLC, a private equity firm, from 2008 to 2011. Mr. Cahill spent nine years with The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., a beverage manufacturing company, most recently as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2003 to 2006 and Executive Chairman until 2007. Mr. Cahill previously spent nine years with PepsiCo, Inc., a food and beverage company, in a variety of leadership positions. He currently serves as lead independent director of American Airlines Group and is also a director at Colgate-Palmolive Company and a former director of Kraft and Legg Mason, Inc.

Mr. Cahill has extensive experience in the food and beverage industry, having served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Kraft and in various key roles at other food and beverage companies. Mr. Cahill brings leadership, operating, marketing and product development experience, as well as insight into accounting and financial subjects.

Tracy Britt Cool

Feroz Dewan
Age: 31

Ms. Cool40

Mr. Dewan has served on our Board since June 2013. Ms. CoolOctober 2016. Mr. Dewan is CEO of Arena Holdings Management LLC, an investment holding company. Previously, Mr. Dewan has served in several positions with Tiger Global Management, an investment firm with approximately $20 billion under management across public and private equity funds, from 2003 to 2015, including most recently as Head of Public Equities. He also served as a Private Equity Associate at Silver Lake Partners, a private equity firm focused on leveraged buyout and growth capital investments in technology, technology-enabled and related industries, from 2002 to 2003. Mr. Dewan has served as Chief Executive Officera director of The Pampered Chef,Fortive Corporation, a direct seller of high-quality cooking tools,diversified industrial growth company, since November 2014. Ms. Cool joined Berkshire Hathaway, The Pampered Chef’s parent company, in December 2009 as Financial Assistant to the Chairman. Ms. Cool is currently the Chairman of Benjamin Moore & Co., a leading manufacturer and retailer of paints and architectural coatings (since June 2012), Chairman of Larson-Juhl, a manufacturer and distributor of wood and metal framing products (since January 2012), Chairman of Oriental Trading Company, a direct merchant of party suppliers, arts and crafts, toys and novelties (since November 2012), and Chairman of Johns Manville, a manufacturer of commercial and industrial roofing systems, fire-protection systems, thermal and acoustical insulation, glass textile wall coverings and flooring (since November 2012).

Ms. CoolJuly 2016.

Mr. Dewan has experience as chairman of several Berkshire Hathaway subsidiaries,with technology and technology related companies as well as insight intoexperience in the areas of financial investmentmatters, risk management and other complex subjects.

corporate governance. 

Jeanne P. Jackson

Age: 64

65

Ms. Jackson has served on our Board since July 2, 2015 and previously served on the Kraft board of directors from October 2012 to July 2, 2015. Ms. Jackson has served as President Product and MerchandisingStrategic Advisor, of NIKE, Inc., a designer, marketer and distributor of athletic footwear, equipment and accessories, since July 1, 2013.June 2016. She previously served as NIKE's President, Product and Merchandising from July 2013 until June 2016 and President, Direct to Consumer at NIKE, Inc. from 2009 until July 2013. Prior to that, she founded and served as the Chief Executive Officer of MSP Capital, a private investment company, from 2002 to 2009 and as Chief Executive Officer of Walmart.com, a private eCommerce enterprise, from 2000 to 2002. Ms. Jackson currently serves as a director of Delta Airlines, Inc. and McDonald’s Corporation and was formerly a director of Kraft and Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. Ms. Jackson previously served in various leadership positions at Gap Inc., Victoria’s Secret, Saks Fifth Avenue and Federated Department Stores, Inc., all clothing retailers, and Walt Disney Attractions, Inc., the theme parks and vacation resorts division of The Walt Disney Company, a mass media company.

Ms. Jackson brings leadership, operating and marketing experience as a result of her experience as a current and former senior executive with several major consumer retailers. Having supervised principal financial officers and served on audit committees of several public companies, Ms. Jackson also has knowledge of accounting and financial subjects.


Jorge Paulo Lemann

Age: 76

77

Mr. Lemann has served on our Board since June 2013. Mr. Lemann is a Founding Partner and has been a Board Member of 3G Capital since 2004 and a Director of Anheuser-Busch InBev since 2004. Mr. Lemann founded and was Senior Partner of Banco de Investimentos Garantia S.A. in Brazil from 1971 through June 1998. He was also Chairman of the Latin American Advisory Committee of the New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Lemann has been a member of JP Morgan International Council since 2012.

Mr. Lemann has experience as a director of a consumer products company and has strong international experience in the beverage industry. He also has broad knowledge of strategy, financial, investing and business development.

Mackey J. McDonald

Age: 69

70

Mr. McDonald has served on our Board since July 2, 2015 and previously served on the Kraft board of directors from October 2012 to July 2, 2015. Mr. McDonald has served as a Senior Advisor to Crestview Partners, a private equity firm, since 2008. Prior to that, he served at VF Corporation, an apparel manufacturer, as Chief Executive Officer from 1996 to 2008 and as President from 1993 to 1996. Mr. McDonald also served at VF Corporation as a director from 1993 to 1998 and as Chairman of the Board from 1998 to 2008. Mr. McDonald currently serves as a director of Hyatt Hotels Corporation and was formerly a director of Kraft, Mondelēz International and Wells Fargo & Company.

As a former president and chief executive officer of a global consumer products company, Mr. McDonald brings industry knowledge as well as leadership and operating experience.

John C. Pope

Age: 66

67

Mr. Pope has served on our Board since July 2, 2015 and previously served on the Kraft board of directors from August 2012 to July 2, 2015. Mr. Pope has served as Chairman of PFI Group, LLC, a financial management firm, since 1994. Mr. Pope also serves as Chairman of the Board of R.R. Donnelley and Sons Co., a printing company, since May 2014 and as a director of Talgo S.A., a railcar manufacturer, since March 2015. From November 2004 to December 2011, he served as Chairman of

the Board of Waste Management, Inc., a provider of comprehensive waste management services. Mr. Pope also served as Chairman of the Board of MotivePower Industries, Inc., a manufacturer and remanufacturer of locomotives and locomotive components, from December 1995 to November 1999. Prior to joining MotivePower Industries, Inc., Mr. Pope served in various capacities at United Airlines, a U.S.-based airline, and its parent, UAL Corporation, including as Director, Vice Chairman, President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Marketing and Finance. Mr. Pope is Chairman of the Board of R.R. Donnelley and Sons Co. and a director of Talgo S.A. and Waste Management, Inc. Mr. Pope was formerly a director of Con-way, Inc., Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc., Kraft, Mondelēz International and Navistar International Corporation.

Mr. Pope has served as Chairman of a financial management firm and in several key leadership roles at a global company, including as Chief Financial Officer. Combined with his experience as an audit committee member of several public companies, Mr. Pope brings accounting and financial expertise, as well as leadership, operating, marketing and marketinginternational experience.

Marcel Herrmann Telles

Age: 65

66

Mr. Telles has served on our Board since June 2013. Mr. Telles is a Founding Partner and has been a Board Member of 3G Capital since 2004 and a Director of Anheuser-Busch InBev since 2004. He has also served as a Director of AmBev, a subsidiary of Anheuser-Busch InBev since 2000, and as Chief Executive Officer of Companhia Cervejaria Brahma (which became AmBev in 2002) from 1989 to 1999. Mr. Telles was formerly a director of Lojas Americanas S.A. and Burger King Worldwide Holdings, Inc. and served as an advisory board member of ITAU-UNIBANCO.

Mr. Telles has experience as a chief executive officer of a consumer products company and as a director of multiple public and private companies in various industries. He has knowledge of strategy and business development, finance, supply chain management and distribution and leadership development.


PROPOSAL 2. ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. As described in detail in the CD&A, our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and motivate superior executive talent, including our Named Executive Officers, who are critical to our success. We believe that our compensation program effectively aligns the interests of employees and stockholders and rewards superior financial and operational performance. Please read the CD&A beginning on page 3528 and “Executive Compensation Tables” beginning on page 4133 for specific details about our executive compensation programs. Your vote is not intended to address any specific item of our compensation program, but rather to address our overall approach to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers described in this Proxy Statement. This vote on the Named Executive Officer compensation is advisory, and therefore will not be binding on Kraft Heinz, our Compensation Committee or our Board. However, our Board and Compensation Committee value our stockholders’ opinions and will evaluate the results of this vote.

At our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, the compensation of our named executive officers was approved by approximately 98.4% of the votes cast. This result demonstrated strong shareholder support for our executive compensation approach. The Compensation Committee believes that the current compensation programs effectively align pay and performance and promote long-term shareholder value; therefore no specific program changes were made as a result of the voting results.
We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement by voting in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that Kraft Heinz’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to Kraft Heinz’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Executive Compensation Tables and related narrative discussion.”

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of our Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF AN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION VOTE

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act and related SEC rules, we are asking our stockholders to indicate how frequently they want to vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, such as Proposal 2 in this Proxy Statement. By voting on this Proposal 3, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation once every one, two or three years. This non-binding “frequency” vote is required at least once every six years beginning with this Annual Meeting.

After careful consideration of this proposal, our Board determined that an annual advisory vote on named executive officer compensation is the most appropriate alternative for Kraft Heinz and recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation.

The Board believes that stockholders should vote on named executive officer compensation every year so that they may annually provide us with their direct input. Setting a one-year period for holding this stockholder vote will enhance stockholder communication by providing a clear, simple means for Kraft Heinz to obtain information on investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices. In addition, an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is consistent with our policy of seeking input from, and engaging in discussions with, our stockholders on corporate governance matters and our executive compensation program. We understand that our stockholders may have different views as to the best approach for Kraft Heinz, and we look forward to hearing from our stockholders on this proposal.

In voting on this proposal, you should be aware that you are not voting “for” or “against” the Board’s recommendation to vote for a frequency of one year for holding future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation. Rather, you are voting on your preferred voting frequency by

choosing the option of one year, two years or three years or you may abstain from voting on this proposal. Because this vote is advisory and not binding, our Board and Compensation Committee may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and Kraft Heinz to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option approved by our stockholders.

The Board recommends a vote for a 1 YEAR interval for the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation.

PROPOSAL 4. APPROVAL OF THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

Attracting, retaining, rewarding and motivating our employees, directors, officers, consultants and other service providers who are expected to contribute significantly to the success of Kraft Heinz and incentivizing such individuals to perform at the highest level is critical to achieving our strategic and operating goals, including our goal to increase stockholder value. Cash and equity-based awards, including performance-based awards, are key components of our compensation package. We believe that the ability to grant these types of awards allows us to remain competitive in the marketplace and enables us to link executive compensation to performance, and to attract, retain and motivate high-caliber talent dedicated to our long-term growth and success.

We are asking stockholders to approve The Kraft Heinz Company 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2016 Omnibus Plan”). On February 2, 2016, our Board unanimously approved and adopted the 2016 Omnibus Plan. The effective date of the 2016 Omnibus Plan is February 2, 2016, and the plan will expire on the tenth anniversary of the effective date. The approval and adoption of the 2016 Omnibus Plan is subject to approval and ratification by Kraft Heinz stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

We are seeking stockholder approval and ratification of the 2016 Omnibus Plan in order to (i) comply with NASDAQ rules requiring stockholder approval of equity compensation plans, (ii) satisfy the stockholder approval requirement under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and the rules and regulations thereunder (collectively, “Section 162(m)”) so that the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) may grant awards that are intended to meet the requirements of the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) and (iii) allow us to continue to utilize cash and equity-based awards, including performance-based awards, to attract, retain and motivate employees and to further align the interests of our employees with those of our stockholders.

Summary of the 2016 Omnibus Plan

The following is a summary of the 2016 Omnibus Plan. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2016 Omnibus Plan, which is attached asAppendix A to this Proxy Statement.

The purpose of the 2016 Omnibus Plan

The purpose of the 2016 Omnibus Plan is to attract, retain and reward those employees, directors and other individuals who are expected to contribute significantly to our success, to incentivize such individuals to perform at the highest level, to strengthen the mutuality of interests between such individuals and our stockholders and, in general, to further the best interests of Kraft Heinz and our stockholders.

Types of awards

The 2016 Omnibus Plan provides for the grant of options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), deferred stock, performance awards, investment rights, other stock-based awards and cash-based awards.

Plan administration

The 2016 Omnibus Plan is administered by the Committee or such other committee the Board designates to administer the plan. Subject to the terms of the 2016 Omnibus Plan and applicable law, and the rules of the NASDAQ, the Committee (or its delegate) will have the power and authority to, among other things, designate participants and determine the types of awards to be granted, the number of shares to be covered and the terms and conditions of those awards. Additionally, the Committee has the authority to determine the vesting schedules of awards (which will generally provide for full vesting no earlier than 12 months from the date of grant, except with respect to an unrestricted pool of 5% of the total number of shares of Kraft Heinz common stock (“Common Shares”) available under the 2016 Omnibus Plan or certain other awards). The Committee will also have the authority to interpret and administer the 2016 Omnibus Plan and any instrument or agreement relating to the 2016 Omnibus Plan and to make any other determination and take any other action that it deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the 2016 Omnibus Plan.

Shares available for awards

Subject to adjustment as provided below, the maximum number of shares available for issuance under the 2016 Omnibus Plan is 18,000,000 Common Shares. Each Common Share with respect to which an option or stock-settled SAR is granted will reduce the aggregate number of Common Shares available for issuance by one share, and each Common Share underlying any other stock-based awards granted under the 2016 Omnibus Plan will reduce the aggregate number of Common Shares available for issuance by one share. Following approval of the 2016 Omnibus Plan, Kraft Heinz will no longer make awards from legacy equity plans. With respect to SARs settled in shares, each Common Share with respect to which such SAR is exercised will count against the aggregate and individual share limitations, regardless of the number of shares actually delivered. If any option, SAR or other stock-based award granted under the plan expires, terminates or is canceled for any reason without having been exercised in full, the number of Common Shares subject to such award that were not issued will again be available for the purpose of awards under the 2016 Omnibus Plan. If any shares of restricted stock, performance awards or other stock-based awards denominated in shares awarded under the 2016 Omnibus Plan to a participant are forfeited for any reason, the number of forfeited shares of restricted stock, performance awards or other stock-based awards denominated in shares will again be available for purposes of awards under the 2016 Omnibus Plan. Common Shares tendered or withheld in payment of an exercise price or for withholding taxes of an award will not again be available for issuance under the 2016 Omnibus Plan.

The following individual participant limitations will apply:

(i)The maximum number of Common Shares subject to any award of stock options, SARs, restricted stock, RSUs or other stock-based award to a participant in any fiscal year will be 2,000,000 Common Shares per type of award or in the aggregate;

(ii)There are no annual individual share limitations applicable to awards of restricted stock, RSUs or other stock-based awards for which the grant, vesting or payment is not subject to the attainment of performance goals;

(iii)The maximum aggregate amount of cash that may be paid pursuant to performance awards which may be granted under the 2016 Omnibus Plan and are settled in cash based on the fair market value (as defined below in the section entitled “— Options”) of Common Shares to any participant in any fiscal year will be 2,000,000 Common Shares multiplied by the per-share fair market value as of the relevant vesting, payment or settlement date; and

(iv)The maximum value of a cash payment made under a performance award (other than an award based on the fair market value (as defined below in the section entitled “— Options”) of Common Shares) which may be granted to any participant in any fiscal year will be $10,000,000.

Additionally, the aggregate fair market value of awards that may be granted under the 2016 Omnibus Plan to a non-employee director for service as director during any fiscal year may not exceed $750,000.

Eligible participants

Any director, employee, consultant or other service provider of Kraft Heinz or any of its subsidiaries will be eligible to participate in the 2016 Omnibus Plan. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, there are approximately 42,000 employees of Kraft Heinz and its subsidiaries and 11 non-employee directors of Kraft Heinz who are eligible to participate in the 2016 Omnibus Plan. However, only eligible employees of Kraft Heinz and its subsidiaries are eligible to be granted incentive stock options under the 2016 Omnibus Plan. Eligibility for the grant of awards and actual participation in the 2016 Omnibus Plan will be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

Changes in capitalization

In the event of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, extraordinary dividend, subdivision, combination or reclassification, reorganization or partial or complete liquidation, or any other corporate event having a similar effect, the Committee will appropriately adjust any or all of (i) the number and kind of shares that thereafter may be made the subject of awards under the plan (including the share limit, the incentive stock option limit and the annual individual share limits for performance-based awards) and (ii) the terms of any outstanding award, including the exercise price and the number or kind of shares or other securities of Kraft Heinz or other property subject to outstanding awards.

In the event of a merger or consolidation that results in the acquisition of substantially all of the outstanding shares of Kraft Heinz, or in the event of a sale of substantially all of Kraft Heinz’s assets, the Committee may (i) make cash payment to award holders in exchange for the cancellation of the award (including, in the case of options and SARs, the excess of the fair market value (as defined in the 2016 Omnibus Plan) over the exercise price), (ii) cancel and terminate without payment any option or SAR having a per-share exercise price greater than or equal to the fair market value (as defined in the 2016 Omnibus Plan) of the shares subject to the award or (iii) provide for the substitution or assumption of awards, accelerate the exercisability or lapse of restrictions on awards, or deliver notice of termination at least five days prior to the consummation of such transaction, during which period participants may exercise outstanding awards.

Description of Awards

Options

Subject to the provisions of the 2016 Omnibus Plan, the Committee will be permitted to grant stock options under the 2016 Omnibus Plan. The exercise price per Common Share and terms of each option will be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that the exercise price will not be less than the fair market value of a Common Share on the date that the option is granted. Under the 2016 Omnibus Plan, the “fair market value” of a Common Share is equal to the closing price of a Common Share reported on the NASDAQ on the trading day of, or immediately prior to, the grant date. An option will be exercisable only in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Committee in the award agreement. The 2016 Omnibus Plan prohibits repricing of stock options without stockholder approval. The Committee fixes the vesting terms it deems appropriate when granting options. In addition, the Committee may, in its discretion, provide that an option may become vested and exercisable in whole or in part, in installments, cumulative or otherwise, for any period of time specified by the Committee and reflected in an award agreement. Under our current form of option award agreement, options vest over a five year period and an optionee has 90 days to exercise his or her vested options after termination of employment without cause, and one year to exercise after retirement, death or disability. The Committee will fix the term of each option, not to exceed ten years.

For non-U.S. participants, if the term of an option would otherwise expire during or within 10 business days of the expiration of a blackout period, the term of the option will be extended to the close of business of the tenth business day following the expiration of the blackout period.

SARs

Subject to the provisions of the 2016 Omnibus Plan, the Committee will be permitted to grant SARs under the 2016 Omnibus Plan. SARs may be granted to participants either alone (“freestanding”) or in addition to other awards granted under the 2016 Omnibus Plan (“tandem”). Except under certain circumstances described in the 2016 Omnibus Plan, a freestanding SAR will not have a term of greater than ten years. In the case of any tandem SAR related to an option, the SAR will not be exercisable until the related option is exercisable and will terminate, and no longer be exercisable, upon the termination or exercise of the related option. Unless it is a substitute award, a freestanding SAR will not have a grant price less than the fair market value (as defined above) of the Common Share on the date of grant.

Restricted stock and RSUs

Subject to the provisions of the 2016 Omnibus Plan, the Committee will be permitted to grant awards of restricted stock and RSUs under the 2016 Omnibus Plan. Shares of restricted stock and RSUs will be subject to any restrictions that the Committee may impose, including any limitation on the right to vote a share of restricted stock or the right to receive any dividend or dividend equivalent. If deemed necessary, the Committee may require that, as a condition of any grant of restricted stock, the participant will deliver a signed stock power or other instruments of assignment, which would permit transfer to Kraft Heinz of all or a portion of the Common Shares subject to the restricted stock award in the event that the award is forfeited.

Deferred stock

Under the 2016 Omnibus Plan, the Committee is permitted to grant deferred stock to participants, subject to the conditions that deferred stock will be settled upon expiration of the deferral period specified for an award by the Committee. In addition, deferred stock will be subject to any restrictions on transferability, risk of forfeiture and other restrictions that the Committee may impose and, the Committee, in its discretion, may award dividend equivalents with respect to awards of deferred stock.

Performance awards

The Committee may grant a performance award to a participant payable upon the attainment of specific performance goals. The Committee may grant performance awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m), as well as performance awards that are not intended to qualify. If the performance award is an RSU or payable in shares of restricted stock, then the shares will be transferable to the participant or the RSU will vest only upon attainment of the relevant performance goal. The Committee will, in its sole discretion, designate within the first 90 days of a performance period (or, if shorter, within the maximum period allowed under Section 162(m) of the Code) the participants who will be eligible to receive performance compensation awards in respect of such performance period. The Committee will also determine the length of performance periods, the types of awards to be issued, the performance criteria that would be used to establish the performance goals, the kinds and levels of performance goals and any objective performance formula used to determine whether a performance compensation award has been earned for the performance period. The Committee is permitted to adjust or modify the calculation of performance goals in the event of any unusual or extraordinary corporate item, corporate transaction, any other unusual or nonrecurring events and changes in tax law or accounting standards, so long as that adjustment or modification does not cause the performance compensation award to fail to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Investment rights

The Committee is authorized to grant investment rights that entitle a participant to purchase for cash a stated number of Common Shares at a stated purchase price that is not less than the fair market value of Common Shares on the grant date. A participant will be entitled to exercise the right to purchase such Common Shares during the period specified in the investment rights notice. The Committee will determine the terms and conditions of such awards.

Other awards

The Committee is authorized to grant to participants other awards that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, Common Shares or factors that may influence the value of Common Shares or an equity interest in any entity with respect to which, Kraft Heinz holds, directly or indirectly, a controlling interest. The Committee will determine the terms and conditions of such awards.

The Committee is also permitted to grant cash-based awards to participants. In its discretion, the Committee will determine the number of cash-based awards to grant to a participant, the duration of the period during which, and any conditions under which, the cash incentive awards will be eligible to vest or will be forfeited, and any other terms and conditions applicable.

Termination of Employment

The Committee may provide, by rule or regulation or in any award agreement, or may determine in any individual case, the circumstances in which awards shall be exercised, vested, paid or forfeited in the event a participant ceases to provide service to Kraft Heinz or any subsidiary prior to the end of a performance period or exercise or settlement of such award.

Change in Control

Unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, in the event of a change in control (as defined in the 2016 Omnibus Plan), a participant’s unvested award will be treated in accordance with one of the following methods as determined by the Committee:

(i)awards, whether or not vested, will be continued, assumed or have new rights substituted as determined by the Committee;

(ii)the Committee, in its sole discretion, may provide for the purchase of any awards by Kraft Heinz or an affiliate for an amount of cash equal to the excess of the change in control price of the shares covered by such awards, over the aggregate exercise price of such awards; or

(iii)if and to the extent that the approach chosen by the Committee results in an acceleration or potential acceleration of the exercise, vesting or settlement of an award, the Committee may impose such conditions upon the exercise, vesting or settlement of such award as it determines.

Term of the 2016 Omnibus Plan

No award will be granted under the 2016 Omnibus Plan after ten years from the original effective date for the 2016 Omnibus Plan. However, unless otherwise expressly provided in the 2016 Omnibus Plan or in an award agreement, any award granted may extend beyond such date, and the authority of the Committee to amend, alter, adjust, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the award, or to waive any conditions or rights under the award, and the authority of the Board to amend the 2016 Omnibus Plan, will extend beyond such date.

Assignability

Except as permitted by the Committee, awards granted under the 2016 Omnibus Plan may not be sold, pledged or otherwise transferred, other than following the death of a participant by will or the

laws of descent. A participant’s beneficiary or estate may exercise vested options during the applicable exercise period following the death of the participant, subject to the same conditions that would have applied to exercise by the participant.

Amendment

The Board may amend, suspend or terminate the 2016 Omnibus Plan and any outstanding awards granted under the 2016 Omnibus Plan, in whole or in part, at any time, provided that all material amendments to the 2016 Omnibus Plan require the prior approval of the stockholders and must comply with the rules of the NASDAQ. Examples of the types of amendments that the Board is entitled to make without stockholder approval include, without limitation, the following: (i) ensuring continuing compliance with applicable law, the rules of the NASDAQ or other applicable stock exchange rules and regulations or accounting or tax rules and regulations; (ii) minor changes of a “housekeeping” nature; (iii) changing the vesting provision of the 2016 Omnibus Plan or any award thereunder, subject to certain limitations; (iv) changing the termination provisions of any award that does not entail an extension beyond the original expiration date thereof; (v) adding a cashless exercise feature, payable in securities, where such feature provides for a full deduction of the number of underlying Common Shares from the 2016 Omnibus Plan reserve, and any amendment to a cashless exercise provision; (vi) adding a form of financial assistance and any amendment to a financial assistance provision which is adopted; (vii) changing the process by which a participant who wishes to exercise his or her award can do so; and (viii) delegating any and all of the powers of the Committee to administer the 2016 Omnibus Plan to officers of Kraft Heinz, subject to certain limitations.

No amendment to the 2016 Omnibus Plan requiring the approval of the stockholders of Kraft Heinz under any applicable securities laws or requirements will become effective until such approval is obtained. In addition, the approval of the holders of a majority of the Common Shares present and voting in person or by proxy at a meeting of stockholders shall be required for, among other things, an increase in the maximum number of Common Shares that may be made the subject of awards under the 2016 Omnibus Plan, any adjustment (other than in connection with a stock dividend, recapitalization or other transaction where an adjustment is permitted or required under the 2016 Omnibus Plan), an amendment that reduces or would have the effect of reducing the exercise price of an option or SAR previously granted under the 2016 Omnibus Plan or an extension to the term or an outstanding option or SAR beyond the expiry date thereof. Furthermore, except as otherwise permitted under the 2016 Omnibus Plan, no change to an outstanding award that will adversely impair the rights of a participant may be made without the consent of the participant except to the extent that such change is required to comply with applicable law, stock exchange rules and regulations or accounting or tax rules and regulations.

Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) currently provides that if, in any year, the compensation that is paid to the Chief Executive Officer or to any of the three other most highly compensated executive officers (currently excluding the Chief Financial Officer) exceeds $1,000,000 per person, any amounts that exceed the $1,000,000 threshold will not be deductible by Kraft Heinz for U.S. federal income tax purposes, unless the compensation qualifies for an exception to Section 162(m). Certain performance-based awards under plans approved by stockholders are not subject to the deduction limit. Options and certain cash incentive awards to “covered employees” that will be awarded under the 2016 Omnibus Plan are intended to be eligible for this performance-based exception.

Section 409A

Section 409A of the Code imposes restrictions on nonqualified deferred compensation. Failure to satisfy these rules will result in accelerated taxation, an additional tax to the holder of the amount equal to 20% of the deferred amount, and a possible interest charge. Stock options granted with an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of the underlying Common Shares on the

date of grant will not give rise to “deferred compensation” for this purpose unless they involve additional deferral features. Stock options that will be awarded under the 2016 Omnibus Plan are intended to be eligible for this exception. In addition, it is intended that the provisions of the 2016 Omnibus Plan comply with Section 409A of the Code, and all provisions of the 2016 Omnibus Plan will be construed and interpreted in a manner consistent with the requirements for avoiding taxes or penalties under these rules.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The United States federal income tax consequences of the issuance and/or exercise of option awards under the 2016 Omnibus Plan is as follows.

Incentive stock options

An incentive stock option results in no taxable income to the optionee or a deduction to Kraft Heinz at the time it is granted or exercised. However, upon exercise, the excess of the fair market value of the Common Shares acquired over the option exercise price is an item of adjustment in computing the alternative minimum taxable income of the optionee, if applicable. If the optionee holds the Common Shares received as a result of an exercise of an incentive stock option for the later of two years from the date of the grant or one year from the date of exercise, then the gain realized on disposition of the Common Shares is treated as a long-term capital gain. If the Common Shares are disposed of during this period, however (i.e., a “disqualifying disposition”), then the optionee will include into income, as compensation for the year of the disposition, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the Common Shares, upon exercise of the option over the option exercise price (or, if less, the excess of the amount realized upon disposition of the Common Shares over the option exercise price). Any additional gain or loss recognized upon the disposition will be recognized as a capital gain or loss by the optionee. In the event of a disqualifying disposition, Kraft Heinz will be entitled to a deduction, in the year of such a disposition, in an amount equal to the amount includible in the optionee’s income as compensation. The optionee’s tax basis in the Common Shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option is equal to the option price paid, plus any amount includible in his or her income as a result of a disqualifying disposition.

Non-qualified stock options

A non-qualified stock option results in no taxable income to the optionee or deduction to Kraft Heinz at the time it is granted. An optionee exercising a non-qualified stock option will, at that time, realize taxable compensation in the amount equal to the excess of the then fair market value of the Common Shares over the option exercise price. Subject to the applicable provisions of the Code, Kraft Heinz will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes in the year of exercise in an amount equal to the taxable compensation realized by the optionee. The optionee’s tax basis in Common Shares received upon exercise is equal to the sum of the option exercise price plus the amount includible in his or her income as compensation upon exercise.

Any gain (or loss) upon subsequent disposition of the Common Shares will be a long or short-term capital gain to the optionee (or loss), depending upon the holding period of the Common Shares. If a non-qualified option is exercised by tendering previously owned Common Shares in payment of the option price, then, instead of the treatment described above, the following will apply: a number of new Common Shares equal to the number of previously owned shares tendered will be considered to have been received in a tax-free exchange; the optionee’s basis and holding period for such number of new Common Shares will be equal to the basis and holding period of the previously owned Common Shares exchanged. The optionee will have compensation income equal to the fair market value on the date of exercise of the number of new Common Shares received in excess of such number of exchanged Common Shares; the optionee’s basis in such excess Common Shares will be equal to the amount of such compensation income, and the holding period in such Common Shares will begin on the date of exercise.

Plan Benefits

It is not presently possible to determine the dollar value of payments that may be made or the number of awards that may be granted under the 2016 Omnibus Plan in the future, or the individuals who may be selected for such awards because awards under the 2016 Omnibus Plan are made at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of The Kraft Heinz Company 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

PROPOSAL 5. RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for the selection,appointment, compensation, oversight, retention and termination of our independent auditors. Pursuant to its Charter, the Audit Committee has authority to approve all audit engagement fees to be paid to the independent auditors. The Audit Committee selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”),PwC, a registered public accounting firm, as our independent auditors for 2016. 2017.
The Audit Committee and the Board are requesting, as a matter of policy, that stockholders ratify the selection of PwC as our independent auditors.

The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the continued retention of PwC to serve as the Company’s independent auditors for 2017 is in the best interests of the Kraft Heinz and its stockholders. The Audit Committee and the Board are not required to take any action as a result of the outcome of the vote on this proposal. However, if our stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee may investigate the reasons for our stockholders’ rejection and may consider whether to retain PwC or appoint another independent auditor. Furthermore, even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may appoint a different independent auditor if, in its discretion, it determines that such a change would be in Kraft Heinz’s and our stockholders’ best interests.

PwC has served as our independent auditors since 2015, and had served as the independent auditor to both Kraft and Heinz prior to the 2015 Merger. We expect that representatives of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders. Additional information about our independent auditors, including our pre-approval policies and PwC’s aggregate fees for 20142015 and 2015,2016, can be found below under “Board Committees and Membership — Audit Committee.”

The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Kraft Heinz’s independent auditors for 2016.

2017.



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES AND CODES OF CONDUCT

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Guidelines articulate our governance philosophy, practices and policies in a range of areas, including: the Board’s role and responsibilities; composition and structure of the Board; establishment and responsibilities of the committees of the Board; executive and director performance evaluations; and succession planning. The Governance Committee reviews the Guidelines annually and recommends any changes to the Board.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors and Code of Conduct for Employees

We have a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors (the “Directors Ethics Code”) that is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

honest and ethical conduct;

due care, diligence and loyalty;

confidentiality of our proprietary information;

compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, including insider trading compliance; and

accountability for adherence to the Directors Ethics Code and prompt internal reporting of violations.

Annually, each non-employee director acknowledges in writing that he or she has received, reviewed and understands the Directors Ethics Code.

We also have a written Code of Conduct for employees (the “Code of Conduct”). It includes a set of employee policies that cover ethical and legal practices for nearly every aspect of our business. The Code of Conduct reflects our values and contains important rules our employees must follow when conducting business to promote compliance and integrity. The Code of Conduct is part of our global compliance and integrity program that provides support and training throughout our company and encourages reporting of wrongdoing by offering anonymous reporting options and a non-retaliation policy. We will disclose in the Corporate Governance section of our Web site (described below) any amendments to our Directors Ethics Code or Code of Conduct and any waiver granted to an executive officer or director under these codes.

Corporate Governance Materials Available on Our Web Site

Our Web site contains the Guidelines, our Board committee charters, the Code of Conduct and the Directors Ethics Code. To view these documents, go tohttp://ir.kraftheinzcompany.comand click on “Corporate Governance.” We will promptly deliver free of charge, upon request, a copy of the Guidelines, the Board committee charters, the Code of Conduct or the Directors Ethics Code to any stockholder requesting a copy. Requests should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at The Kraft Heinz Company, One PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222.200 East Randolph Street, Suite 7600, Chicago, IL 60601.

The information on our Web site is not, and will not be deemed to be, a part of this Proxy Statement or incorporated into any of our other filings with the SEC.

KEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

We have adopted a number of corporate governance practices to promote and enhance the Board’s independent leadership, accountability and oversight:

Leadership Structure. We have an independent Chairman of the Board, separate from our Chief Executive Officer. No member of our management serves on the Board.

Executive Sessions. At each Board meeting, our directors meet without the Chief Executive Officer or any other members of management present to discuss issues important to Kraft Heinz, including any matters regarding management.

Special Meetings of the Board. Our Amended and Restated By-Laws (the “By-Laws”) allow the Chairman, the Vice Chairman, along with two other directors, or the majority of the directors then in office to call special meetings of the Board.

Annual Performance Evaluation. The Governance Committee develops and oversees an annual evaluation process for the Board.

Special Meetings of Stockholders. Our By-Laws allow stockholders of record of at least 20% of the voting power of our outstanding stock to call a special meeting of stockholders.

Stockholder Action by Written Consent. Our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) allows stockholder action by written consent if such consent is signed by stockholders holding not less than the minimum number of shares necessary to authorize such action at a meeting at which all shares of capital stock entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.

Majority Voting in Director Elections. Our By-Laws provide that in uncontested elections, director nominees must be elected by a majority of the votes cast.

Leadership Structure. We have an independent Chairman of the Board, separate from our Chief Executive Officer. No member of our management serves on the Board.
Executive Sessions. At each Board meeting, our directors meet without the Chief Executive Officer or any other members of management present to discuss issues important to Kraft Heinz, including any matters regarding management.
Special Meetings of the Board. Our Amended and Restated By-Laws (the “By-Laws”) allow the Chairman, the Vice Chairman, or the chair of any committee with the support of at least two other directors, or the majority of the directors then in office, to call special meetings of the Board.
Annual Performance Evaluation. The Governance Committee develops and oversees an annual evaluation process for the Board.
Special Meetings of Stockholders. Our By-Laws allow stockholders of record of at least 20% of the voting power of our outstanding stock to call a special meeting of stockholders.

Stockholder Action by Written Consent. Our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) allows stockholder action by written consent if such consent is signed by stockholders holding not less than the minimum number of shares necessary to authorize such action at a meeting at which all shares of capital stock entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.
Majority Voting in Director Elections. Our By-Laws provide that in uncontested elections, director nominees must be elected by a majority of the votes cast.
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board has an independent Chairman, Mr. Behring, and a Vice Chairman, Mr. Cahill. The Chairman of the Board is responsible for facilitating a highly functioning and effective Board, providing overall leadership and encouraging open communications. The Vice Chairman of the Board assists the Chairman and serves at meetings at which the Chairman is not in attendance or is unable to participate in a motion. Currently, no member of management serves on the Board.

The Board has not adopted a formal policy regarding the need to separate or combine the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. While under the Guidelines, the Board generally believes that, as a general matter, it is not necessary for a member of management to serve as a director, from time to time, the Board may determine that it is appropriate to nominate members of management to the Board, including the Chief Executive Officer. The Board will periodically evaluate our leadership structure to determine what structure is in our best interests at the time based on our particular circumstances. The Board believes that its decision on leadership structure should be based on the particular composition of the Board (including the tenure and skill sets of the individual directors and the Board as a whole) and the needs and opportunities of Kraft Heinz over time. When determining the leadership structure that will allow the Board to effectively carry out its responsibilities and best represent our stockholders’ interests, the Board will consider various factors, including our specific business and long-term strategic needs, our operating and financial performance, industry conditions, the economic and regulatory environment, Board annual self-evaluations, advantages and disadvantages of alternative leadership structures and our corporate governance practices generally.

INDEPENDENCE AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Independence Determinations

The Guidelines require that a majority of the directors meet the NASDAQ listing standards’ “independence” requirements. For a director to be considered independent, the Board must affirmatively determine, after reviewing all relevant information, that a director has no direct or indirect material relationship with Kraft Heinz. The Board determined that, under the NASDAQ listing standards, the following directorsdirector nominees are independent: Mr. Abel, Mr. Behring, Mr. Buffett, Ms. Britt Cool, Mr. Cox,Dewan, Ms. Jackson, Mr. Lemann, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Pope and Mr. Telles. Mr. Cox, who retired in April 2016, was also determined to be independent. Mr. Cahill, the former Chief Executive Officer of Kraft and a current consultant to Kraft Heinz, is not independent.

In conducting its evaluations of Mr. Behring, Mr. Lemann and Mr. Telles, the Board considered each individual’s affiliation with 3G Capital, which currently holds approximately 24% of our outstanding common stock. Similarly, in conducting its evaluations of Mr. Abel, Mr. Buffett and Ms. Britt Cool, the Board considered each individual’s affiliation with Berkshire Hathaway, which currently holds approximately 27% of our outstanding common stock. In conducting its evaluation of Mr. Behring, the Board also considered his service on the board of directors of Restaurant Brands International Inc., the parent company of Burger King and Tim Hortons, quick service restaurant companies, which purchase certain of our products.


Review of Transactions with Related Persons

The Board has adopted a written policy regarding the review, approval or ratification of “related person transactions.” A related person transaction is one in which Kraft Heinz is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and any “related person” had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. In general, “related persons” include our directors, executive officers and 5% stockholders and their immediate family members. In accordance with this policy, the Governance Committee reviews transactions that might qualify as related person transactions. If the Governance Committee determines that a transaction qualifies as a related person transaction, then the Governance Committee reviews, and approves, disapproves or ratifies the related person transaction. The Governance Committee approves or ratifies only those related person transactions that are fair and reasonable to Kraft Heinz and in our and our stockholders’ best interests. Any member of the Governance Committee who is a related person with respect to a transaction under review may not participate in the deliberations or decisions regarding the transaction. The chair of the Governance Committee will review and approve or ratify potential related person transactions when it is not practicable or desirable to delay review of a transaction until a Governance Committee meeting, and will report to the Governance Committee any transaction so approved or ratified. The Governance Committee, in the course of its review and approval or ratification of a related person transaction under this policy, considers, among other things:

the commercial reasonableness of the transaction;

the materiality of the related person’s direct or indirect interest in the transaction;

whether the transaction may involve an actual, or the appearance of a, conflict of interest;

the impact of the transaction on the related person’s independence (as defined in the Guidelines and the NASDAQ listing standards); and

whether the transaction would violate any provision of our Directors Ethics Code or Code of Conduct.

Registration Rights Agreement

In connection with the 2015 Merger, we entered into a registration rights agreement with 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, we granted 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway registration rights with respect to the shares of Kraft Heinz common stock held by 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway as of the date of the closing of the merger, representing shares of Kraft Heinz common stock acquired from Heinz in connection with the merger and/or immediately prior to the merger pursuant to a warrant. The registration rights only apply to registrable shares and not shares of Kraft Heinz common stock subsequently acquired by either party. These rights include demand registration rights, shelf registration rights and “piggyback” registration rights, as well as customary indemnification. The rights are subject to certain holdback and suspension periods. We generally will bear all fees, costs and expenses related to registrations, other than underwriting discounts and commissions attributable to the sale of shares of Kraft Heinz common stock by 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway, as applicable.

Demand Registration Rights

The registration rights agreement grants each of 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway demand registration rights. We will be required, upon the written request of 3G Global Food Holdings or Berkshire Hathaway, to file a registration statement pursuant to its demand rights under the registration rights agreement, as promptly as practicable and to use our reasonable best efforts to effect registration of shares of Kraft Heinz common stock requested to be registered by 3G Global Food Holdings or Berkshire Hathaway, subject to certain exceptions. Each of 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway may request up to three demand registrations in the aggregate.

Shelf Registration Rights

The registration rights agreement also grants each of 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway shelf registration rights. Subject to our eligibility to use a Registration Statement on Form S-3, each of 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway may request that we file a shelf registration statement with respect to some or all of its shares of Kraft Heinz common stock, and, upon such request, we are required to file such registration statement promptly as practicable, subject to certain exceptions.


“Piggyback” Registration Rights

The registration rights agreement grants each of 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway “piggyback” registration rights. If we register any of our shares of common stock, either for our own account or for the account of other stockholders, each of 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway will be entitled, subject to certain exceptions, to include its shares of common stock in the registration.

Holdback Periods

Notwithstanding the registration rights described above, if there is an offering of shares of Kraft Heinz and the managing underwriters for the offering advise us that a public sale or distribution of shares outside the offering would adversely affect the offering, then, if requested, each of 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway will not dispose of, or request the registration of, any registrable shares for a certain period, which we refer to as a holdback period. The holdback period will begin on the 10th day before the pricing date of the offering and extend for either (i) 120 days or (ii) an earlier date, if designated by the managing underwriters.

Suspension Periods

In addition, we may delay or suspend the filing, effectiveness or use of a registration statement for a certain period, which we refer to as a suspension period, if we determine that (i) proceeding with the use or effectiveness of the registration statement would require us to disclose material non-public information and the disclosure of that information at that time would not be in our best interests or (ii) the registration or offering to be delayed or suspended would, if not delayed or suspended, materially adversely affect us or delay or otherwise materially adversely affect the success of any pending or proposed material transaction, including any debt or equity financing, any acquisition or disposition, any recapitalization or reorganization or any other material transaction, whether due to commercial reasons, a desire to avoid premature disclosure of information or any other reason. During any calendar year, there will not be more than two suspension periods and the aggregate number of days included in all suspension periods in that year will not exceed 119 days.

Shareholders’ Agreement

In connection with the 2015 Merger, 3G Global Food Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway entered into a shareholders’ agreement that governs how each party and their affiliates will vote the shares of Kraft Heinz common stock held by them as of the date of closing of the merger, with respect to supporting

certain directors that are designated by either 3G Global Food Holdings or Berkshire Hathaway. Pursuant to the shareholders’ agreement, 3G Global Food Holdings agreeagrees that for so long as Berkshire Hathaway and its affiliates control shares representing at least 66% of the voting power in election of directors of shares owned by Berkshire Hathaway as of the consummation of the merger, 3G Global Food Holdings and its affiliates will vote their shares of Kraft Heinz common stock in favor of the three Kraft Heinz board nominees designated by Berkshire Hathaway and not take any action to remove such designees without Berkshire Hathaway’s consent. Similarly, Berkshire Hathaway will agree that for so long as 3G Global Food Holdings and its affiliates control shares representing at least 66% of the voting power in elections of directors of shares owned by 3G Global Food Holdings as of the consummation of the merger, Berkshire Hathaway and its affiliates will vote their shares of Kraft Heinz common stock in favor of the three Kraft Heinz board nominees designated by 3G Global Food Holdings and not take any action to remove such designees without 3G Global Food Holdings’ consent. The shareholders’ agreement provides that each party’s foregoing rights and obligations will step down upon specified reductions in ownership below the 66% threshold described above by either 3G Global Food Holdings or Berkshire Hathaway and their respective affiliates, as applicable.

Consulting Agreement

On July 9, 2015, we entered into a Consulting Agreement with Mr. Cahill pursuant to which he provides advisory and consulting services to us related to current and historical finances, relationships with licensors, customers and vendors, employee matters, product development, marketing and distribution, government affairs and strategic opportunities. Mr. Cahill’s services under the Consulting Agreement are distinct from his duties as a director. For 2015,2016, Mr. Cahill received $2,000,000$4,000,000 as payment for his services under this agreement.


OVERSIGHT OF RISK MANAGEMENT

Our business faces various risks, including strategic, financial, legal, regulatory, operational, accounting and reputational risks. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management and mitigation of risk. Identifying, managing and mitigating our exposure to these risks and effectively overseeing this process are critical to our operational decision-making and annual planning processes. The Board has ultimate responsibility for risk oversight, but it has delegated primary responsibility for overseeing risk assessment and management to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee discusses guidelines and policies to govern the process by which management assesses and manages risk, including Kraft Heinz’s major financial risk exposures and the steps taken to monitor and control those exposures. In addition, pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses risk assessment and risk management guidelines, policies and processes utilized in our Strategic Enterprise Risk Management (“SERM”) approach. Our SERM approach is an ongoing process effected at all levels of our operations and across business units and functions to identify, assess, monitor, manage and mitigate risk. The SERM approach facilitates open communication between management and the Board to advance the Board’s and committees’ understanding of our risk management process, how it is functioning, the participants in the process, key risks to our business and performance and the information gathered through the approach. The Audit Committee annually reviews the SERM approach, as well as the results of the annual SERM assessment.

Annually, the Audit Committee allocates responsibility for overseeing the review and assessment of key risk exposures and management’s response to those exposures to the full Board, or another committee of the Board or it retains those responsibilities, as appropriate. Management provides reports to the Board, the Audit Committee or other appropriate committee, in advance of meetings, regarding these key risks and the actions management has taken to monitor, control and mitigate these risks. Management also attends Board and committee meetings to discuss these reports and provide any updates. The Audit Committee or other appropriate committee reports key risk discussions to the Board following its meetings. Board members may also further discuss the risk management process directly with members of management.

In addition to the SERM approach, the Board and each committee review and assess risks related to our business and operations throughout the year. For example, the Board frequently discusses our strategic plans, issues and opportunities in light of circumstances in the food and beverage industry and the global economic environment. In addition, as discussed under “Board Committees and Membership — Compensation Committee — Analysis of Risk in the Compensation Architecture” below, the Compensation Committee oversees an evaluation of our compensation structure’s impact on risk taking and risk mitigation.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires our executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock to report to the SEC their ownership of our common stock and changes in that ownership. As a practical matter, our Office of the Corporate Secretary assists our directors and executive officers by monitoring their transactions and completing and filing Section 16(a) reports on their behalf.

We reviewed copies of reports filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and written representations from reporting persons that all reportable transactions were reported. Based solely on that review, we believe that during the fiscal year ended January 3,December 31, 2016, all required filings were timely made in accordance with Exchange Act requirements, except four. In July 2015, we were late in filing the Form 3 of Eduardo Pelleissone, our Executive Vice President of Global Operations, to report his initial stock ownership in connection with the 2015 Merger. In November 2015, we filed a Form 4 on Jeanne Jackson’s behalf reporting an inadvertent purchase and subsequent sale of shares by her broker without her knowledge or direction. Upon discovering the error, we filed a Form 4 on Ms. Jackson’s behalf to report the transactions. In February 2016, we filed a Form 5 to report additional shares of common stock inadvertently omitted from the Form 3 filed on behalf of Matthew Hill, our Zone President of Europe, reporting his initial stock ownership in connection with the 2015 Merger. In March 2016, we filed a Form 4 on behalf of George Zoghbi, our Chief Operating Officer of the U.S. Commercial business, relating to the late reporting of the tax withholding in connection with the vesting of certain stock awards.

requirements.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

Information for stockholders and other parties interested in communicating with the Chairman, the Board or our independent directors, individually or as a group, is included in our Guidelines which isare available on our Web site at http://ir.kraftheinzcompany.com/governance.cfm.governance.cfm. Our Corporate Secretary forwards communications relating to matters within the Board’s purview to the independent directors; communications relating to matters within a Board committee’s area of responsibility to the chair of the appropriate committee; and communications relating to ordinary business matters, such as suggestions, inquiries and consumer complaints, to the appropriate Kraft Heinz executive or employee. Our Corporate Secretary does not forward solicitations, junk mail and obviously frivolous or inappropriate communications.


MEETING ATTENDANCE

We expect directors to attend all Board meetings and meetings of the committees on which they serve and annual meetings.serve. We understand, however, that occasionally a director may be unable to attend a meeting. The Board held sixfive meetings in 20152016 and the committees of the Board held a total of 1219 meetings. Each director attended 75% or more of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served during 2015. As we were2016. Directors are invited, but are not a public company until afterrequired, to attend the 2015 Merger, we did not hold an annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders. At our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, three of our directors attended in 2015.

person.

BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEMBERSHIP

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP

Our Board designates the committee members and chairs based on the Governance Committee’s recommendations. Following the 2015 Merger, theThe Board hadhas four standing committees: Audit, Compensation, Governance and Operations and Strategy. The Board has a written charter for each committee. The charters setcommittee, which sets forth each committee’s roles and responsibilities. All committeeThese charters are available on our Web site as discussed above under “Corporate Governance and Board Matters —Governance Guidelines and Codes of Conduct — Corporate Governance Materials Available on Our Web site.” The following table lists the current committee membership and the number of meetings held by each committee in 2015.

  Audit Compensation Governance Operations
& Strategy

Alexandre Behring (Chairman)

  Chair Chair X

John T. Cahill (Vice Chairman)

    Chair

Gregory E. Abel

    X

Warren E. Buffett

    

Tracy Britt Cool

    

L. Kevin Cox*

 X X  

Jeanne P. Jackson

 X  X 

Jorge Paulo Lemann

  X X 

Mackey J. McDonald

 X X  

John C. Pope

 Chair  X 

Marcel Herrmann Telles

  X X 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Meetings in 2015

 5 2 1 2

*Mr. Cox’s term on the Board will expire at the Annual Meeting.

2016.

Director Audit Compensation Governance 
Operations
& Strategy
Alexandre Behring (Chairman)   Chair Chair X
John T. Cahill (Vice Chairman)       Chair
Gregory E. Abel       X
Tracy Britt Cool        
Warren E. Buffett        
Feroz Dewan X      
Jeanne P. Jackson X   X  
Jorge Paulo Lemann   X X  
Mackey J. McDonald X X    
John C. Pope Chair   X  
Marcel Herrmann Telles   X X  
Meetings in 2016 11 2 4 2
AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Board established the Audit Committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. The responsibilities of our Audit Committee are more fully described in our Audit Committee charter. Under its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of our financial statements. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment and oversight of our independent auditors, including review of their qualifications, independence and performance. Our Audit Committee, among other duties, oversees:

the integrity of our financial statements, our accounting and financial reporting processes and our systems of internal control over financial reporting and safeguarding of our assets;

our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

our independent auditors’ retention, termination, qualifications, independence and performance;

the performance of our internal auditors and internal audit function;

our financial matters and financial strategy; and

our guidelines and policies that govern the process by which we assess and manage risk.


The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with our independent auditors their audit procedures, including the audit plan and its scope with respect to Kraft Heinz’s consolidated financial statements, as well as annually reviews their independence and performance. In addition, the Audit Committee regularly meets with the independent auditors without management present at their in-person meetings. The Audit Committee also selects the lead audit engagement partner.

partner and considers regular rotation of the lead partner(s) as required by law or otherwise appropriate.

The Audit Committee consists entirely of independent directors, and each director meets the independence requirements set forth in the listing standards of NASDAQ, Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the Audit Committee charter. The Board has determined that each Audit Committee member is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements. In addition, the Board has determined that Ms. Jackson and Mr. Pope areaudit committee financial experts” within the meaning of SEC regulations. No Audit Committee member received any payments in 20152016 from us other than compensation for service as a director.

The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of any complaints we receive. We encourage employees and third-party individuals and organizations to report concerns about our accounting controls, auditing matters or anything else that appears to involve financial or other wrongdoing. To report such matters, please contact us at www.KraftHeinzEthics.com.

www.KraftHeinzEthics.com.

Audit Committee Report for the Year Ended January 3, 2016

To our Stockholders:

Management has primary responsibility for Kraft Heinz’s financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal control over financial reporting. The role of the Audit Committee of the Kraft Heinz Board of Directors is to oversee Kraft Heinz’s accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of its financial statements. In addition, we assist the Board in its oversight of:

The integrity of Kraft Heinz’s financial statements and Kraft Heinz’s accounting and financial reporting processes and systems of internal control over financial reporting and safeguarding the company’s assets;


Kraft Heinz’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

Kraft Heinz’s independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance;

The performance of Kraft Heinz’s internal auditors and the internal audit function;

Kraft Heinz’s financial matters and financial strategy; and

Kraft Heinz’s guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.

Our duties include overseeing Kraft Heinz’s management, the internal audit department and the independent auditors in their performance of the following functions, for which they are responsible:

Management

Preparing Kraft Heinz’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP);

Establishing and assessing effective financial reporting systems and internal controls and procedures; and

Reporting on the effectiveness of Kraft Heinz’s internal control over financial reporting.

Internal Audit Department

Independently assessing management’s system of internal controls and procedures; and

Reporting on the effectiveness of that system.

Independent Auditors

Auditing Kraft Heinz’s financial statements;

Issuing an opinion about whether the financial statements conform with U.S. GAAP; and

Auditing the effectiveness of Kraft Heinz’s internal control over financial reporting.

Periodically, we meet, both independently and collectively, with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors, among other things, to:

Audit Committee Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2016
To our Stockholders:
Management has primary responsibility for Kraft Heinz’s financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal control over financial reporting. The role of the Audit Committee of the Kraft Heinz Board of Directors is to oversee Kraft Heinz’s accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of its financial statements. In addition, we assist the Board in its oversight of:
Ÿ    The integrity of Kraft Heinz’s financial statements and Kraft Heinz’s accounting and financial reporting processes and systems of internal control over financial reporting and safeguarding the company’s assets;
Ÿ    Kraft Heinz’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
Ÿ    Kraft Heinz’s independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance;
Ÿ    The performance of Kraft Heinz’s internal auditors and the internal audit function;
Ÿ    Kraft Heinz’s financial matters and financial strategy; and
Ÿ    Kraft Heinz’s guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.
Our duties include overseeing Kraft Heinz’s management, the internal audit department and the independent auditors in their performance of the following functions, for which they are responsible:
Management
Ÿ    Preparing Kraft Heinz’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP);
Ÿ    Establishing and assessing effective financial reporting systems and internal controls and procedures; and
Ÿ    Reporting on the effectiveness of Kraft Heinz’s internal control over financial reporting.
Internal Audit Department
Ÿ    Independently assessing management’s system of internal controls and procedures; and
Ÿ    Reporting on the effectiveness of that system.
Independent Auditors
Ÿ    Auditing Kraft Heinz’s financial statements;
Ÿ    Issuing an opinion about whether the financial statements conform with U.S. GAAP; and
Ÿ    Auditing the effectiveness of Kraft Heinz’s internal control over financial reporting.
Periodically, we meet, both independently and collectively, with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors, among other things, to:
Ÿ    Discuss the quality of Kraft Heinz’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the adequacy and effectiveness of its internal controls and procedures;
Ÿ    Review significant audit findings prepared by each of the independent auditors and internal audit department, together with management’s responses; and
Ÿ    Review the overall scope and plans for the current audits by the internal audit department and the independent auditors.

Discuss the quality of Kraft Heinz’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the adequacy and effectiveness of its internal controls and procedures;


Review significant audit findings prepared by each of the independent auditors and internal audit department, together with management’s responses; and

Review the overall scope and plans for the current audits by the internal audit department and the independent auditors.

Prior to Kraft Heinz’s filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, with the SEC, we also:
Ÿ    Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management;
Ÿ    Discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16 Communications with Audit Committees;
Ÿ    Discussed with the independent auditors their evaluation of the accounting principles, practices and judgments applied by management;
Ÿ    Discussed all other items the independent auditors are required to communicate to the Audit Committee in accordance with applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence;
Ÿ    Received from the independent auditors the written disclosures and the letter describing any relationships with Kraft Heinz that may bear on the independent auditors’ independence; and
Ÿ    Discussed with the independent auditors their independence from Kraft Heinz, including reviewing non-audit services and fees to assure compliance with (i) regulations prohibiting the independent auditors from performing specified services that could impair their independence and (ii) Kraft Heinz’s and the Audit Committee’s policies.
Based upon the reports and discussions described in this report and without other independent verification, and subject to the limitations of our role and responsibilities outlined in this report and in our written charter, we recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Kraft Heinz’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, which was filed with the SEC on February 23, 2017.
Audit Committee:
John C. Pope, Chair
Feroz Dewan
Jeanne P. Jackson
Mackey J. McDonald

Prior to Kraft Heinz’s filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2016, with the SEC, we also:

Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management;

Discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380);

Discussed with the independent auditors their evaluation of the accounting principles, practices and judgments applied by management;

Discussed all other items the independent auditors are required to communicate to the Audit Committee in accordance with applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence;

Received from the independent auditors the written disclosures and the letter describing any relationships with Kraft Heinz that may bear on the independent auditors’ independence; and

Discussed with the independent auditors their independence from Kraft Heinz, including reviewing non-audit services and fees to assure compliance with (i) regulations prohibiting the independent auditors from performing specified services that could impair their independence and (ii) Kraft Heinz’s and the Audit Committee’s policies.

Based upon the reports and discussions described in this report and without other independent verification, and subject to the limitations of our role and responsibilities outlined in this report and in our written charter, we recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Kraft Heinz’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2016, which was filed with the SEC on March 3, 2016.

Audit Committee:

John C. Pope, Chair

L. Kevin Cox

Jeanne P. Jackson

Mackey J. McDonald

The information contained in the above report will not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC, nor will this information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Kraft Heinz specifically incorporates it by reference in such filing.

Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other permissible non-audit services. The pre-approval authority details the particular service or category of service that the independent auditors will perform. The Audit Committee’s policy also

requires management to report at Audit Committee meetings throughout the year on the actual fees charged by the independent auditors for each category of service. The Audit Committee reviews this policy annually.

During the year, circumstances may arise when it may be necessary to engage the independent auditors for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval authority. In those instances, the Audit Committee approves the services before we engage the independent auditors. If pre-approval is needed before a scheduled Audit Committee meeting, the Audit Committee delegated pre-approval authority to its chair. The chair must report on such pre-approval decisions at the committee’s next regular meeting.

During 2015,2016, the Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors.


Independent Auditors’ Fees

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by our independent auditors, PwC, for 20152016 and 20142015 are set forth in the table below (in thousands).

   2015   2014 

Audit Fees

  $11,842    $5,809  

Audit-Related Fees

   879     196  

Tax Fees

   2,679     794  

All Other Fees

   —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $    15,400    $    6,799  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

  2016 2015
Audit Fees $8,079
 $11,842
Audit-Related Fees 134
 879
Tax Fees 676
 2,679
All Other Fees 15
 
Total $8,904
 $15,400
“Audit Fees” include (a) the audit of our consolidated financial statements, including statutory audits of the financial statements of our affiliates and (b) the reviews of our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements (quarterly financial statements). In 2015, audit fees include work related to the 2015 Merger.

“Audit-Related Fees” include professional services in connection with accounting consultations and procedures related to various other audit and special reports.

“Tax Fees” include professional services in connection with tax compliance and advice.

“All Other Fees” consist principally of software license fees related to research and benchmarking.

All fees above include out-of-pocket expenses.


GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The Board determined that all of the Governance Committee members are independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ listing standards. The Governance Committee’s responsibilities include, among others:

identifying qualified individuals for Board membership consistent with Board approved criteria;

considering incumbent directors’ performance and suitability in determining whether to recommend that our Board nominate them for re-election;

making recommendations to our Board as to directors’ independence and related person transactions;

recommending to our Board the appropriate size, function, needs, structure and composition of our Board and its committees;

recommending to our Board directors to serve as members of each committee and candidates to fill committee vacancies;

developing and recommending to our Board and overseeing an annual self-evaluation process for our Board;

administering and reviewing the Directors Ethics Code; and

advising our Board on corporate governance matters, including developing and recommending to our Board corporate governance guidelines.

The Governance Committee will consider any candidate a stockholder properly presents for election to the Board in accordance with the procedures set forth in the By-Laws. The Governance Committee uses the same criteria to evaluate a candidate suggested by a stockholder as the Governance Committee uses to evaluate a candidate it identifies, which are described above under “Company Proposals —Proposal 1. Election of Directors — Director Nomination and Qualification,” and makes a recommendation to the Board regarding the candidate’s appointment or nomination for election to the Board. After the Board’s consideration of the candidate suggested by a stockholder, our Corporate Secretary will notify that stockholder whether the Board decided to appoint or nominate the candidate.

For a description of how stockholders may nominate a candidate for the Governance Committee to consider for election to the Board at an annual meeting, see “2017“2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders” in this Proxy Statement.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Board has determined that all of the directors who served on the Compensation Committee during 20152016 are independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ listing standards. No member of the Compensation Committee is a current, or during 20152016 was a former, officer or employee of Heinz, Kraft, Kraft Heinz or any of its subsidiaries. During 2015,2016, no member of the Compensation Committee had a relationship that must be described under the SEC rules relating to disclosure of related person transactions (for a description of our policy on related person transactions, see “Corporate Governance and Board Matters — Independence and Related Person Transactions” in this Proxy Statement). During 2015,2016, none of our executive officers served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that had one or more of its executive officers serving on the Board or the Compensation Committee.

Responsibilities

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities are more fully described in our Compensation Committee charter, and include, among other duties:

establishing, reviewing, approving and administering our compensation and benefits policies generally (subject, if required by applicable law, stock exchange requirements or our charter documents, to stockholder approval), including establishing, reviewing and making recommendations with respect to any incentive-compensation and equity-based plans of the Company that are subject to Board approval;

assessing the appropriateness and competitiveness of our executive compensation programs, including our severance programs and executive retirement income design;

programs;

reviewing and approving our Chief Executive Officer’s goals and objectives, evaluating his performance in light of these goals and objectives and, based upon this evaluation, determining both the elements and amounts of his compensation;

reviewing management’s recommendations for, and determining and approving the compensation of, our executive officers and other officers subject to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act;

determining annual incentive compensation, equity awards and other long-term incentive awards granted under our equity and long-term incentive plans to eligible participants;

reviewing our compensation policies and practices for employees as they relate to our risk management practices and risk-taking incentives;

overseeingin consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, periodically reviewing the company’s management development and succession planning process (including succession planning for emergencies) for our Chief Executive Officer and his executive direct reports and, as appropriate, evaluating potential candidates;

reports;

monitoring our policies, objectives and programs related to diversity and inclusion and reviewing periodically our performance in light of appropriate measures;

assessing the appropriateness of, and advising our Board regarding, the compensation of non-employee directors for service on our Board and its committees;

monitoring compliance with stock ownership guidelines;

reviewing and discussing with management our say on pay voting results, as well as preparing and approving the CD&A and the committee’s report to stockholders for inclusion in our annual proxy statement; and

reviewing and approving the implementation and execution of clawback policies that allow Kraft Heinz to recoup compensation paid to executive officers and other employees.

Under the Compensation Committee’s charter, it may delegate any of its responsibilities to the chair, another committee member or a subcommittee of committee members.

Compensation Consultant to the Committee

Under the Compensation Committee’s charter, it is authorized to retain and terminate any consultant, as well as to approve the consultant’s fees and other terms of the engagement. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors. The Compensation Committee has not retained a consultant or other advisor.


Analysis of Risk in the Compensation Architecture

Annually, the Compensation Committee evaluates the current risk profile of our executive and broad-based employee compensation programs. In its 20152016 evaluation, the Compensation Committee reviewed our executive compensation structure to determine whether our compensation policies and practices encourage our executive officers or employees to take unnecessary or excessive risks and whether these policies and practices properly mitigate risk. As described below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our compensation structure is designed to incentivize executives and employees to achieve company financial and strategic goals as well as individual performance goals that promote long-term stockholder returns. Based on its assessment of the current programs, the Compensation Committee concluded that the 20152016 executive compensation plans were designed in a manner to:

Achieve a balance of short and long-term performance aligned with key stakeholder interests;

Discourage executives from taking unnecessary or excessive risks that would threaten the reputation and/or sustainability of Kraft Heinz; and

Encourage appropriate assumption of risk to the extent necessary for competitive advantage purposes.

Compensation Committee Report for the Year Ended January 3, 2016

The Compensation Committee oversees our compensation programs on behalf of the Board. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. In reliance on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with our Annual Meeting and incorporated by reference in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2016, which was filed with the SEC on March 3, 2016.

Compensation Committee:

Alexandre Behring, Chair

L. Kevin Cox

Jorge Paulo Lemann

Mackey J. McDonald

Marcel Herrmann Telles


Compensation Committee Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2016
The Compensation Committee oversees our compensation programs on behalf of the Board. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. In reliance on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with our Annual Meeting and incorporated by reference in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, which was filed with the SEC on February 23, 2017.
Compensation Committee:
Alexandre Behring, Chair
Jorge Paulo Lemann
Mackey J. McDonald
Marcel Herrmann Telles


OPERATIONS AND STRATEGY COMMITTEE

The Board formed the Operations and Strategy Committee to assist it in overseeing and facilitating the development and implementation of our ongoing operations and corporate strategy. The committee is led by Mr. Cahill, our Vice Chairman, and meets with management periodically to discuss, review and evaluate the development and implementation of our operational objectives and corporate strategy. Based on its review, the committee shares with management the Board’s expectations for the operations of the company and strategic planning process, makes recommendations to management on areas of improvement, and provides other feedback and guidance to management on behalf of the Board. The Operations and Strategy Committee’s responsibilities also include, among others, reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding:

our corporate strategy, integration plans, performance, and annual capital plan, as well as certain individual capital projects;

the impact of external developments and factors, such as the changes in economic and market conditions, competition in the industry, environmental and safety regulations, federal, state and local regulations and technology, on our corporate strategy and its execution;

identification of prospects and opportunities for corporate developments and growth initiatives, including acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and strategic alliances; and

implementation of our corporate strategy through corporate developments and growth initiatives, including acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and strategic alliances.


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
In accordance with SEC rules, we are including the following shareholder proposals (Proposals 4 through 6), along with the supporting statements of the respective shareholder proponents. Kraft Heinz is not responsible for any inaccuracies in the shareholder proposals and supporting statements. Each shareholder proposal is required to be submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented.
The Board recommends that you vote AGAINST each of these proposals for the reasons set forth in the company’s Statement in Opposition, which follows the three proposals beginning on page 24.
In accordance with Rule 14a-8(l)(1), the names, addresses and shareholdings of the filers of these proposals will be supplied upon request.
PROPOSAL 4. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - RESOLUTION RELATED TO SUSTAINABILITY AND NUTRITION
Sustainability Reporting 2017-The Kraft Heinz Company
RESOLVED: Shareholders request The Kraft Heinz Company (Kraft Heinz) issue a comprehensive sustainability report describing its environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and goals, including nutrition targets. Shareholders request the report be available on the company website by November 1, 2017, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information.
Supporting Statement: Kraft Heinz lacks a comprehensive sustainability report of ESG-related corporate policies, practices and metrics that follows guidelines such as those provided by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) .Tracking and reporting ESG business practices make a company more responsive to a global business environment characterized by changing legislation, and heightened public expectations for corporate accountability, including, for a food-based company like ours, health and obesity concerns. Reporting also helps companies better integrate and gain strategic value from existing sustainability efforts, identify gaps and opportunities in its products and processes, enhance company-wide communications, and publicize its efforts and receive feedback.
Support for comprehensive sustainability reporting continues to grow. In 2013, KPMG found that of 4,100 global companies surveyed seventy-one percent published ESG reports. The United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment has more than 1,500 signatories with over $60 trillion of combined assets under management. These members seek ESG-related performance information from companies in order to analyze fully the risks and opportunities associated with existing and potential investments. Public disclosure of ESG information enables investors to learn how management is addressing nearand long-term risks and opportunities (e.g. operational,reputational, and regulatory).Peers of Kraft Heinz such as Mondelēz and Nestle issue comprehensive sustainability reporting annually, including nutrition targets.
Many of Kraft Heinz's competitors recognize the risks of obesity and public health concerns in their 10-K reports. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that obesity has reached epidemic proportions, with nearly 2 billion people overweight, including 41 million children. Kraft Heinz's competitors actively participated in the 2016 Access to Nutrition Index, which allows companies to view their progress on nutrition related issues compared to their peers. Kraft and Heinz were rankedseparately, and both declined to participate in the Index which ranked the companies based on theirreported information. The two companies ranked 18th and 19th, scoring just above the three companies who received a zero rating. In comparison, Mondez, which split from Kraft Foods, ranked 4th. As one of the largest food companies, we believe Kraft Heinz can have a significant impact on nutrition and health issues. Not managing risks associated with the current public health crisis could pose significant regulatory, legal, reputational, and financial risks.
Sustainability reporting is increasingly expected by company shareholders and stakeholders. Concerned investors are continually monitoring and evaluating the ESG performance of companies alongside financial information. By implementing this resolution, Kraft Heinz can demonstrate its values, and can drive its practices and performance.
We urge you to support this resolution.

PROPOSAL 5. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - PACKAGING
WHEREAS: The Kraft Heinz Company states it is "dedicated to the sustainable health of our people, our planet and our company," yet a significant amount of its brand product packaging is not recyclable. Non-recyclable packaging exacerbates already difficult efforts to recycle more materials. New studies suggest that discarded plastic packaging which reaches the ocean is toxic to marine animals and potentially to humans.
Kraft Capri-Sun and Kool-Aid Jammers juice drinks, and Heinz pouch pack ketchup are examples of products packaged in laminate pouches that cannot be recycled and are rarely collected for recovery. They are designed for the dump, not for recycling. Capri-Sun could be dispensed in recyclable PET plastic or glass bottles, paper cartons or aluminum cans as are Minute Maid, Juicy Juice, Tropicana and other juice brands. Using non-recyclable packaging when recyclable alternatives are available wastes valuable resources such as aluminum that could be perpetually recycled.
An estimated 5 billion units of Capri-Sun are sold worldwide. Only 14% of plastic packaging is collected for recycling. Billions of pouches, representing significant amounts of embedded value and energy, lie buried in landfills. Non-recyclable packaging is more likely to be littered, swept into waterways and break down into small indigestible particles swirling in ocean gyres that birds and fish mistake for food. A recent study of 29 rivers flowing into the Great Lakes found every sample to be carrying a variety of microplastics, often in concentrations far larger than detected in the lakes themselves.
A UN Environment Program report estimated that plastic does $13 billion in damage to marine ecosystems annually. California spends nearly $500 million annually preventing trash, much of it packaging, from polluting beaches, rivers and oceanfront. Eight million tons of plastics leak into the ocean annually. If no action is taken, oceans are expected to contain more plastic than fish by 2050.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency studies suggest a synergistic effect between persistent toxic chemicals and plastic debris. Plastics absorb toxics such as dioxins from water and transfer them to the marine food web and potentially to human diets, increasing the risk of adverse effects to wildlife and humans.
Better management of plastic could save consumer goods companies $4 billion a year. Making all packaging recyclable is the first step to reduce the threat posed by ocean debris. Shareholders deserve an explanation why the company has not made stronger efforts to reduce non-recyclable packaging.
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: Shareowners of Kraft Heinz request that the board of directors issue .a report at reasonable cost, omitting confidential information, assessing the environmental impacts of continuing to use non-recyclable brand packaging.
Supporting Statement: Proponents believe the report should include an assessment of the reputational, financial and operational risks associated with continuing to use non-recyclable brand packaging and if possible, goals and a timeline to phase out non-recyclable packaging; or provide evidence of substantive actions taken to make these materials recyclable.

PROPOSAL 6. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - DEFORESTATION
Sustainable Forestry Report
Whereas:
Palm oil, soya, sugar, beef and paper are used in a variety of Kraft-Heinz products. Global demand for these commodities is fueling deforestation and human rights violations, including child and forced labor.
Approximately a third of recorded large-scale land acquisitions globally since 2000 involve crops such as sugar cane, palm oil, and soy. Many of these acquisitions involve evicting traditional land holders, through coercion or fraud ("land grabs").
The Consumer Goods Forum, a global industry network, recognizes that "Deforestation is one of the principal drivers of climate change, accounting for 17% of greenhouse gases today. The consumer goods industry, through its growing use of soya, palm oil, beef, paper and board, creates many of the economic incentives which drive deforestation." (Consumer Goods Forum press release, 11/29/10).
Kraft-Heinz lags behind its competitors in these areas. Peer companies are working to sustainably source commodity drivers of deforestation. Colgate-Palmolive, McDonalds, Danone, Unilever, Mondelēz and Nestle commit to address deforestation in their global supply chains. These companies also respond to CDP Forests, a reporting framework supported by investors managing $19 Trillion. Kraft Heinz ranks 18 out of 20 major brands in efforts to address forced labor according to the Know the Chain platform. In 2015, Heinz and Kraft independently scored 8th and 10th place out of 10 companies evaluated by the Union of Concerned Scientists on palm oil sourcing. Neither company responded to CDP.
Kraft-Heinz discloses little information on efforts to sustainably source palm oil, soya, paper, beef and sugar. Meaningful indicators would include:
A commitment to buy exclusively from suppliers independently verified as not engaged in 1) deforestation (including peatlands, high conservation value, or high carbon stock forests), or 2) human rights abuses, including land grabs;
Evidence of proactive implementation efforts, such as a time-bound plan, verification processes, non-compliance protocols and regular reporting; and
A commitment to work towards strengthening third-party verification programs and multi-- stakeholder initiatives to achieve compliance with the company's policy.
Kraft Heinz may face reputational and operational risks by failing to adequately disclose its approach to managing deforestation and related risks The 2015 Nielson Corporate Responsibility Survey found that 58% of millennials - a critical demographic for increasing market share and brand loyalty - are willing to pay more for products made by companies "known for being environmentally friendly." Intangible assets represent a significant and material portion of Kraft Heinz's total assets.
RESOLVED: Shareholders request the Board to prepare a public report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, by November 1, 2017, describing how Kraft-Heinz is assessing the company's supply chain impact on deforestation and associated human rights issues, and its plans to mitigate these risks.

KRAFT HEINZ’S STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSALS 4-6
Our Vision at The Kraft Heinz Company is To Be The Best Food Company, Growing A Better World. We believe “Growing A Better World” means working to improve our planet, its people and the communities where we work and live. From our quality controls to the relationships we have with our growers and suppliers, Kraft Heinz is committed to responsible, sustainable practices extending to every facet of our business, and continuous evaluation to identify better ways to operate.
When Kraft Heinz was formed in 2015, we prioritized corporate citizenship and sustainability efforts, and have been working hard to combine policies and address material issues, focusing on areas where we can make the greatest impact. We’ve established key pillars of corporate social responsibility (CSR) to guide our efforts, including the environment, supply chain, nutrition & well-being and the community. Biannually, we intend to issue a global CSR report to communicate our progress in these areas, the first of which we expect to deliver in the second half of 2017. The following highlights some of our commitments and activities within these areas.
Environment
We believe taking care of our planet is a key priority. Managing our footprint and reducing our resource needs minimizes our impact today while preserving natural resources for future generations.
Company-wide, we are engaged in many sustainability initiatives, including the following:
We have committed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, energy, water and waste by 15 percent globally by 2020 (versus 2015 baseline)
We have shared our climate change strategy through the Carbon Disclosure Project’s Climate, Water and Forest questionnaires
We have partnered with How2Recycle to communicate accurate and consistent recycling instructions to consumers on some of our product packaging
We perform lifecycle assessments and leverage results to influence packaging decisions where relevant
We continue to invest in and innovate our plant-based protein offerings, particularly through our BOCA brand
Supply Chain
We believe in a sustainable global supply chain. Establishing responsible farm-to-market ingredient and material sourcing policies and practices helps us deliver world-class products today and tomorrow.
Our supply chain sustainability initiatives focus on the areas that matter most to our business, and where we believe we can make the biggest difference. These initiatives include:
We have developed and implemented a global palm oil policy stating Kraft Heinz will, among other things, source 100 percent sustainable palm oil and derivatives, work with suppliers to achieve full traceability, forbid child/forced labor and make progress towards zero net deforestation
We have developed and implemented a global animal welfare policy committing that Kraft Heinz will, among other things, source 100 percent of its eggs from hens that live in cage-free environments (inclusive of enriched housing, cage-free and free range), transition from traditional gestation stalls to pregnant sow housing alternatives by 2025 and eliminate animal testing where not essential to food safety and quality
We continue to implement and improve our proprietary Good Agriculture Practices to minimize the adverse effects of farming on the Earth’s natural resources and biodiversity. These includes techniques to reduce the use of chemicals in farming, protect the soil, implement effective irrigation, conserve water and energy, reduce waste and pollution and assure worker safety
We breed hundreds of varieties of our own tomatoes which combine high yields and disease resistance to reduce land use and chemical, fertilizer and water requirements
We celebrated 100 years in Ag Research which allows us to continually focus on improving raw ingredients while minimizing environmental impact

Nutrition & Well-being
We believe in making the foods people love even better. Finding ways to improve our products is something we do every day, because consumers should feel good about eating our food.
We remain committed to improving the nutritional profiles of our products and are always looking for ways to help consumers feel better about the foods they love to eat. Some of our efforts include:
We are committed to reducing sodium in our products, and many of our brands already carry reduced sodium alternatives. We have achieved sodium reduction across several of our iconic products in recent years, including: Kraft Singles, Kraft Macaroni and Cheese Shapes, Oscar Mayer Deli Fresh Smoked Ham and Heinz Tomato Ketchup
We offer a variety of low or reduced-calorie products, including Capri Sun Roarin’ Waters, Sugar-Free Jell-O desserts, Philadelphia Light Cream Cheese, Kraft Fat-Free Mayonnaise, Fat-Free Miracle Whip, Kraft 2% Milk Cheeses, Kraft Lite and Fat-Free Salad Dressings and lean meat options including Oscar Mayer Lean Beef Hot Dogs and Deli Fresh Honey Smoked Turkey Breast. Additionally, our Smart Ones and SmartMade meals offer balanced options to help manage calories
We offer many products with beneficial nutrients like protein, Vitamin C, fiber and calcium. These include Lunchables with 100% Juice, Planters NUT-rition,Oscar Mayer P3 Portable Protein Packs, BOCA, Capri Sun, Smart Ones andSmartMade meals, Kraft Singles and Kraft Macaroni and Cheese
We are committed to simplifying our ingredient lines by offering products with no artificial flavors, colors and/or preservatives, including: Kraft Macaroni and Cheese, Philadelphia Cream Cheese, Capri Sun, Crystal Light Pure, Polly-O String Cheese, Oscar Mayer Natural, Jell-O Simply Good, and SmartMade meals
Community
We believe we can end hunger in our lifetime. Aligning our people, products and partnerships to eliminating global hunger is just one of the many ways we’re Growing A Better World every day. We’re committed to building an enduring legacy of good corporate citizenship in the communities where we operate. We promote volunteerism and have made an impact through strategic investments to address hunger and improve nutrition - both globally and in the areas where our employees live and work - with partners like Stop Hunger Now and Feeding America.
In light of our existing efforts, accomplishments and upcoming reports, we believe the preparation of additional reports as requested by these stockholder proposals would be unnecessary, not in our stockholders’ best interests and redundant to our current practices and initiatives. We believe our public statements, track record and current programs reflect our commitment to responsible and sustainable business practices that also enhance our business. We continue to engage in meaningful sustainability initiatives and will continue to disclose these steps. Accordingly, we believe the reports requested would not be an effective use of our company’s resources nor in the best interests of our company or our stockholders.
For the foregoing reasons, the Board unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST these proposals.

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Prior to the 2015 Merger, non-employee directors of Heinz received an annual retainer of $50,000, paid in arrears on December 31 of each year. The Chairman received an annual retainer of $100,000. We also paid directors an additional $10,000 if they served on a Board committee. In lieu of a cash retainer payment, all directors could elect to receive two times the value of their retainer in RSUs. The RSUs were vested as of the grant date, but were not distributed until the date the director ceases to serve on the Board. All directors of Heinz elected to receive RSUs other than Mr. Buffett, who chose to receive no compensation.

Following the 2015 Merger, the Board approved a newour non-employee director compensation program, which was designed to be similar to the program in place at Kraft prior to the 2015 Merger. As a result of these changes, we pro-rated compensation for the non-employee directors based on their respective periods of service before and after the 2015 Merger. The table below summarizes the annual cash and equity compensation elements currently in place for our non-employee directors.

Compensation Element(1)

Fee
($)

Board Retainer

110,000

Chairman Retainer

250,000

Audit Committee Chair Retainer

20,000

Compensation Committee Chair Retainer

20,000

Governance Committee Chair Retainer

10,000

Operations and Strategy Chair Retainer

20,000

Stock Grant Value(2)

125,000

(1)If a director serves as Chair of multiple committees, he/she receives fees for only one committee. Therefore, Mr. Behring does not receive a retainer for service as Chair of the Governance Committee.

(2)In 2015, non-employeeNon-employee directors wereare awarded Kraft Heinz deferred shares. Although the deferred shares wereare vested as of the award date, the shares are not distributed until six months following the date the non-employee director ceases to serve on our Board. When dividends are paid on our common stock, we accrue the value of the dividend paid and issue shares equal to the accrued value six months after the director’s departure.

We pay the non-employee director cash retainers quarterly.


Non-employee directors can defer up to 100% of their cash retainers in 25% increments into accounts that mirror the funds in our 401(k) Plan pursuant to the Kraft Heinz Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Management Directors. Non-employee directors also receive an annual stock award that is granted at the Board meeting immediately following our annual meeting of stockholders. While weWe also pay the non-employee director cash retainers on a quarterly basis. Non-employee directors have notthe option to (i) defer up to 100% of their cash retainers in 25% increments into accounts that mirror certain funds in the Kraft Heinz 401(k) Plan pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Management Directors or (ii) starting in 2017, receive deferred shares annually in lieu of their cash retainer payable in arrears.

In 2016, our Board adopted a fixed minimum stock ownership guideline forguidelines that require non-employee directors as a substantial portion of directors’that elect to receive compensation for service as a director to Kraft Heinz ishold shares of our common stock in an amount equal to five times the formannual Board retainer (equivalent to $550,000) within five years. As all of equity, we believeour current directors have served for less than five years, they are not yet required to meet the stock ownership requirement. We feel strongly that our director compensation program strongly aligns our non-employee directors’ and stockholders’ interests.




The table below presents information regarding the compensation and stock awards that we have paid or granted to our non-employee directors. As discussed above, upon closing of the 2015 Merger, certain legacy Kraft Board members joined the Kraft Heinz Board. For Ms. Jackson and Messrs. Cahill, Cox, McDonald and Pope, the table below does not reflect compensation for services as a Kraft Board member prior to the 2015 Merger. In addition, as discussed above, the Board amended the director compensation program, effective upon closing of the 2015 Merger. Accordingly, directors received pro-rated compensation based on the respective programs and service provided to Heinz and/or Kraft Heinz before and after the 2015 Merger.

2015

2016 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Name

  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash(1)
($)
   Stock Awards(2)(3)
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
   Total
($)
    

Gregory E. Abel

   54,402    182,118        236,520    

Alexandre Behring

   133,533    301,881        435,414    

John T. Cahill(4)

   64,293            —          64,293    

Tracy Britt Cool

   54,402    206,129        260,531    

L. Kevin Cox

   54,402            —          54,402    

Jeanne P. Jackson

   54,402            —          54,402    

Jorge Paulo Lemann

   54,402    182,118        236,520    

Mackey J. McDonald

   54,402            —          54,402    

John C. Pope

   64,293            —          64,293    

Marcel Herrmann Telles

   54,402    182,118        236,520    

Name 
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash (1)
($)
 
Stock Awards(2)
($)
 
All Other
Compensation
($)
 
Total
($)
Gregory E. Abel 110,000
 125,009
 
 235,009
Alexandre Behring 270,000
 125,009
 
 395,009
John T. Cahill(3)
 130,000
 125,009
 
 255,009
Tracy Britt Cool 110,000
 125,009
 
 235,009
L.Kevin Cox 33,846
 
 
 33,846
Feroz Dewan 21,522
 62,335
 
 83,857
Jeanne P. Jackson 110,000
 125,009
 
 235,009
Jorge Paulo Lemann 110,000
 125,009
 
 235,009
Mackey J. McDonald 110,000
 125,009
 
 235,009
John C. Pope 130,000
 125,009
 
 255,009
Marcel Herrmann Telles 110,000
 125,009
 
 235,009
(1)Includes all retainer fees paid or deferred pursuant to the Kraft Heinz Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Management Directors. These figures represent fees paid by Kraft Heinz following the 2015 Merger. Non-employee directors do not receive meeting fees. As mentioned above, Mr. Cox retired effective April 21, 2016 and Mr. Dewan was appointed effective October 21, 2016. In addition, Mr. Buffett elected to receive no compensation for his service as a director.

(2)For 2015, non-employee directors who had previously served as directors of Kraft were granted Kraft deferred shares in May 2015, prior to the consummation of the 2015 Merger. Non-employee directors who had previously served as directors of Heinz were granted the following: (a) for January — July 2 service, a pro rata amount of the annual legacy Heinz RSU grant (equal to approximately $50,000) calculated based on the value of the Heinz shares prior to the merger ($30.46); and (b) for July 3 — December service, a pro rata amount of the Kraft Heinz deferred share grant (equal to approximately $62,500) calculated based on the value of the Kraft Heinz shares on the grant date of December 31, 2015.

(3)(2)The amounts shown in this column represent the full grant date fair value of the RSU/deferred stock awards granted in 20152016 as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 based on the closing price of Kraft Heinz shares on the grant date ($72.7676.74 on December 31, 2015)April 21, 2016). The pro rated grant to Mr. Feroz reflected the grant date price of $87.92 on October 21, 2016. The following table shows the aggregate number of unvested stock options held by each non-employee director outstandingdirectors as of December 31, 2015:2016:

Name

 
Unvested  Stock
Options(a)
Gregory E. Abel 22,166

Alexandre Behring

 44,333

John T. Cahill

—  

Tracy Britt Cool

 22,166

L. Kevin Cox

—  

Jeanne P. Jackson

—  

Jorge Paulo Lemann

 22,166

Mackey J. McDonald

—  

John C. Pope

—  

Marcel Herrmann Telles

 22,166

 (a)Upon commencing service as a director of Heinz in 2013, each non-employee director received a one-time stock option grant equal to $500,000 ($1,000,000 for the Chairman). These options were granted on October 16, 2013 with an exercise price of $22.56. The options cliff-vest on July 1, 2018 and are subject to pro rata vesting in certain circumstances.

(4)
(3)OnAs discussed on page 13, on July 9, 2015, Mr. Cahill entered into a Consulting Agreement with Kraft Heinz pursuant to which he provides advisory and consulting services to Kraft Heinz related to current and historical finances, relationships with licensors, customers and vendors, employee matters, product development, marketing and distribution, government affairs and strategic opportunities. Mr. Cahill’s services under the Consulting Agreement are distinct from his duties as a director.


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which we refer to as the CD&A,"CD&A", outlines the compensation philosophy and objectives of Kraft Heinz and describes our executive pay programs for fiscal year 20152016 and, specifically, for the following Named Executive Officers (also referred to as “NEOs”):

Name

 

NameTitle

Bernardo Hees Chief Executive Officer

Paulo Basilio

 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Eduardo Pelleissone

 Executive Vice President, Global Operations

Carlos Piani

Marcos Romaneiro
 Zone President of CanadaAMEA

Matthew Hill

George Zoghbi
 Zone PresidentChief Operating Officer of EuropeU.S. Commercial Business

Explanatory Note

On July 2, 2015, through a series of transactions, we consummated the merger (the “2015 Merger”) of Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (“Kraft”) with and into H.J. Heinz Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of H.J. Heinz Holding Corporation (“Heinz”). At the closing of the 2015 Merger, Heinz was renamed

Executive Summary
The Kraft Heinz Company and H.J. Heinz Company changed its name to Kraft Heinz Foods Company. This CD&A focuses on compensation of Kraft Heinz and, as a result does not reflect the compensation programs of historical stand-alone Kraft. Furthermore, immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger, each share of Heinz issued and outstanding common stock was reclassified and converted into 0.443332 of a share of Kraft Heinz common stock. All share and per share amounts presented give effect to this conversion.

Prior to the 2015 Merger, the Heinz board of directors had not historically designated a compensation committee. Instead, the full Heinz board of directors was integrally involved in the design of Heinz’s compensation program and decisions with respect to executive compensation. Effective with the closing of the 2015 Merger, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, referred to in this CD&A as the “Committee,” assumed primary responsibility for the design of the compensation program for Kraft Heinz and decisions with respect to executive compensation.

Executive Summary

The Committee(the “Committee”) oversees our executive compensation plans and programs. Our programs are designed to complement each other to provide a clear link between what we pay our NEOs and Kraft Heinz’s performance over both short- and long-term periods. The overall program has been designed to accomplish each of the following goals:

Rewarding superior financial and operational performance;

Placing a significant portion of compensation at risk if performance goals are not achieved;

Aligning the interests of the NEOs with those of our stockholders; and

Enabling us to attract, retain and motivate top talent.

As

Consistent with these goals and as described in further detail below, consistent with these goals, our compensation program has been designed with a view toward linking a significant portion of theeach NEO’s compensation of each NEO to company and individual performance and the growth in the value of Kraft Heinz.

Elements of Compensation Program

As noted above, our compensation program is based on a pay-for-performance philosophy. This section of the CD&A provides an overview of each element of our compensation program and describes both the process for determining such compensation and how such compensation relates to Kraft Heinz’s pay-for-

performancepay-for-performance philosophy and meritocratic principles. The following table summarizes the primary elements and objectives of our 20152016 compensation program for executive officers, including NEOs.

Element                

 

Description

 

Element                DescriptionPrimary Objectives

Base Salary  Ongoing cash compensation based on the executive officer’s role and responsibilities, individual job performance and experience.  

•      Recruitment and retention

Annual Cash Incentive (Performance Bonus Plan)  Annual incentive with target award amounts for each executive officer. Actual cash payouts are linked to achievement of annual company goals and individual performance and can range from 0%-130% of target.  

•     DrivingDrive top-tier performance

•     Motivate and reward

Stock Options  Stock option awards that cliff vest over a five-year period.after five years.  

•     DrivingDrive top-tier performance

•     AlignmentAlign with shareholders

stockholders interests

•     RealizedLink realized value linked entirely to stock appreciation

•     Retention

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)  RSUs that cliff vest after five years are awarded pursuant to our annual bonus swap programs. RSUs vest after five years.program and, in certain cases, individual agreements.  

•     DrivingDrive top-tier performance

•     AlignmentAlign with shareholders

stockholders interests

•     Retention


Base Salaries

Salary

Base salary is the principal “fixed” element of executive compensation at Kraft Heinz and for the NEOs. The Committee believes that it is important that each NEO receive a competitive market place base salary that is competitive for the marketplace to provide appropriate balance between fixed and variable compensation. The initial base salary of each NEO is established in connection with the hiring of such NEO. In establishing base salaries, Kraft Heinz reviews market-based survey data published by the Hay Group and select country specific surveys for informational purposes only, but does not formally benchmark compensation or target compensation levels at any particular percentile of the market-based survey data. The Committee reviews salaries on an annual basis and generally makes any annual changes effective January 1st for all executive officers.. On occasion, Kraft Heinz may review and adjust an executive’s base salary during the course of the year to account for increased responsibilities, roles and other factors. The Committee has responsibility for the review of Mr. Hees’ compensation. Mr. Hees has primary responsibility for the review of the compensation of each of the executives who report directly to him, including each other NEO,the NEOs, and makesprovides salary recommendations to the Committee.

The table below shows the annualized 20152016 base salary for each NEO:

Name

 
Base Salary
($)
($ USD)
 
Mr. Hees 1,000,000

Mr. Basilio

550,000
 

Mr. Pelleissone

Basilio
 600,000550,000
 

Mr. Piani

Pelleissone
 600,000484,231
(1) 

Mr. Hill

Romaneiro
 395,437
(1)
Mr. Zoghbi542,796850,000
(2)

(1)Mr. Piani’sRomaneiro’s base salary is paid in CanadianSingapore Dollars. The amount shown in the table above is based on the 20152016 12-month average exchange rate of 0.7840.695 USD/CAD.SGD.

(2)Mr.  Hill’s base salary is paid in British Pounds. The amount shown in the table above is based onZoghbi’s 2016 compensation was established pursuant to an offer letter (the "2015 Offer Letter") between Mr. Zoghbi and Kraft Heinz entered into following the 2015 12-month average exchange rateMerger. For a description of 1.529 USD/GBP.the 2015 Offer Letter, please review the information below under “Zoghbi Compensation Arrangement.”

We believe that the base salary review process serves our pay-for-performance philosophy because pay increases are generally merit-based and dependent on the NEO’s success and achievement in his role. In addition, each NEO’s target annual incentive award opportunity, as described below, is based on a percentage of his base salary. Therefore, as NEOs earn merit-based salary increases, their annual incentive award opportunities also increase proportionately.

Annual CashPerformance Bonus Plan

We grant performance-based incentive award opportunities under our annual Performance Bonus Plan (the “PBP”). The PBP is designed to motivate and reward employees who contribute positively towards our business strategy and achieve the individual performance objectives. As such, the foundation of the PBP is our Management By Objective (“MBO”) process.

For 2015,2016, the formula for determining a PBP participant’s annual bonus payout was as follows (each item described in more detail below):

Target Award Xx Individual Rating = Bonus Payout

The foundation of the PBP is our Management By Objective (“MBO”) process. At the beginning of each year, the Committee (or, prior to the 2015 Merger, the Heinz board of directors) establishes a series of performance goals, or MBOs, that are established based on the company’s corporate strategy and goals and then “cascaded” throughout the organization.

First, the Committee establishes MBOs for Mr. Hees. Then, in consultation with the Committee, (or, prior to the 2015 Merger, the Heinz board), Mr. Hees establishes corresponding MBOs for each of his direct reports, including the other NEOs. His direct reports, in turn, establish MBOs for their direct reports.

This cascading process allows the company to drive initiatives that are aligned throughout the organization.

Periodic performance monitoring and evaluation is a key aspect of the PBP. Throughout the year, these MBOs are evaluated through review of quantitative and qualitative metrics called “Key Performance Indicators” or “KPIs”. Each PBP participant’s KPIs are monitored monthly, and each participant also receives a quarterly appraisal of the progress

toward the participant’shis or her MBOs based on the KPIs. Similar to the goal settinggoal-setting process, the Committee (and, prior to the 2015 Merger, the Heinz board) performs such an appraisal for Mr. Hees, and Mr. Hees performs the appraisal for each of his direct reports (including the other NEOs). Such evaluations are further cascaded throughout the organization.

Each PBP participant has an opportunity to earn a cash bonus based on (a) the company’s (or a particular business zone or unit) financial performance (or “Financial Multiplier”) and (b) the participant’s performance against his or her MBOs (or “MBO Score”). For Mr. Hees and his direct reports, the Committee may exercise discretion in determining an individual’s final rating (together with the Financial Multiplier and the MBO Score, referred to as the “Individual Rating”) for a year. The Committee assigns the final Individual Rating for Mr. Hees, Mr. Hees (following consultation with the Committee) then assigns the final Individual Rating for his direct reports (including the other NEOs) and such evaluation process cascades throughout the organization.

In 2015,2016, each NEO had four or five MBOs evaluated through at least eight KPIs. The KPIs included metrics associated with the responsibilities of each individual, such as sales growth, customer service level, product quality, innovation, and successfully completingthe successful completion of certain major projects. In addition to financial measures that may be part of an individual’s KPIs, each NEO had a Financial Multiplier in 20152016 based on year-over-year organic change in EBITDA for the period. In connection with the 2015 Merger, the Board also established an additional MBO related to the merger transition and integration for Messrs. Hees, Basilio, and Pelleissone. Similarly, Mr. Piani, who joined the company in September 2015, had MBOs related to the 2015 Merger transition and integration. Based on an overall evaluation of the NEOs, the Committee assigned Individual Ratings ranging from 64%85% to 72%102.3%, with an average of 69%94.6%. The Individual Ratings for Messrs. Hees, Basilio and Pelleissone reflected a positive discretion approved by the Committee to reflect their outstanding performanceAs described below under “Zoghbi Compensation Arrangement”, Mr. Zoghbi’s 2016 annual cash incentive award payout was determined in connectionaccordance with the 2015 Merger and subsequent integration.

Offer Letter.

Each NEO is grantedprovided with a target annual incentive award opportunity (the “Target Award”) prior to the beginning of each year, which is set as a percentage of the NEO’s annual base salary - 250% for Mr. Hees, 200% for Mr. HeesMessrs. Basilio and Pelleissone and 150% of base salary for Messrs. Basilio, Pelleissone, Piani and Hill.Mr. Romaneiro. Due to the nature of Mr. Hees’ role and responsibilities, his Target Award of his base salary is greater than that of the other NEOs. Mr. Piani, who joinedZoghbi’s 2016 Special Incentive Bonus was established pursuant to the company in September 2015 was eligible forOffer Letter between Mr. Zoghbi and Kraft Heinz entered into following the 2015 Merger. For a pro-rata paymentdescription of the 2015 Offer Letter, please review the information below under “Zoghbi Compensation Arrangement.
In 2016, the Performance Bonus Plan.

In 2015, theother NEOs earned the annual cash incentive award payout set forth in the table below:

Name

 Annual Incentive
Award Payout

($)

Mr. Hees

1,450,000 USD) 

Mr. Basilio

Hees
 2,730,574600,000
 

Mr. Pelleissone

Basilio
 1,500,000600,000
 

Mr. Piani

Pelleissone
 1,415,810
155,559(1)

Mr. Hill

Romaneiro
 484,635
(1)
535,151(2)

(1)Mr. Piani, who joined the company in September 2015, was eligible for a pro-rata payment, andRomaneiro’s annual cash incentive award is paid in CanadianSingapore Dollars. The amount shown in the table above is based on the 20152016 12-month average exchange rate of 0.7840.695 USD/CAD.SGD.

(2)Mr. Hill’s compensation is paid in British Pounds. The amount shown in the table above is based on the 2015 12-month average exchange rate of 1.529 USD/GBP.

Annual Bonus Swap Program

- Restricted Stocks Units

As part of its commitment to fostering an ownership mentality, Kraft Heinz permits its executivescertain employees to participate in an annual bonus swap program (the “Bonus Swap Program”). Under the Bonus Swap Program, employees invest a portion of their annual incentive payout in our common stock (we refer to these purchased shares as “Investment Shares”) and leverage that investment through the issuance of matching equity.equity grants. Prior to the 2015 Merger, participants would receive matching2016, we used stock options which were granted with an exercise price based onas the value of Heinz common stock on the grant date and, therefore, participants only realized value to the extent that the valuematching equity component of the company increased afterBonus Swap Program (we refer to these stock options as “Matching Options”). Beginning in 2016, the grant date. These matchingCommittee approved the use of RSUs (we refer to these RSUs as “Matching RSUs”) rather than stock options cliff vest after five years. In 2015, Messrs. Hees, Basilio, Pelleissone and Hill participatedfor the Bonus Swap Program.
To participate in the Bonus Swap Program, eligible employees can elect to use 0%, 25% or 50% of their calculated net bonus (after deducting an amount based on a normalized tax rate depending on country of residence) to purchase Investment Shares. The number of Investment Shares purchased is calculated as the product of the calculated net bonus and the swap election percentage, divided by the closing price reported on the NASDAQ on the date of purchase:
Calculated Net BonusxSwap Election %=# of Investment Shares
NASDAQ Closing Price

The number of Matching RSUs a participant received in 2016 was based on (1) the participant’s gross bonus payout in 2016 relating to the 2015 fiscal year (before-tax) and (2) a multiplier associated with respect to annual cash incentive payouts for 2014the participant’s level in the organization and received matching options.

his or her investment election percentage.

The following table sets forth, for each NEO, the portion of his bonus used to purchase Investment Shares (the “Conversion Amount”), the number of Investment Shares purchased and the number of Bonus Matching OptionsRSUs granted to such NEO:

Name(1)

  Conversion Amount
($)
  Investment Shares
(#)
  2014 Bonus Matching
Options granted in 2015
(#)
Mr. Hees  546,909  17,955  71,819

Mr. Basilio

  315,078  10,344  41,377

Mr. Pelleissone

  150,046    4,926  14,777

Mr. Hill

  267,439    8,780  35,120

(1)The Bonus Swap Plan was administered in February 2015. Mr. Piani was not employed by Kraft Heinz at that time.

In December 2015, the Committee approved Kraft Heinz’s 2016 Bonus Swap.

Name 
Conversion Amount
($ USD)
 
Investment Shares
(#)
 
2015 Bonus Matching
RSUs granted in 2016
(#)
Mr. Hees 434,974 5,601 18,671
Mr. Basilio 179,938 2,317 7,725
Mr. Pelleissone 179,938 2,317 7,725
Mr. Romaneiro 217,060 2,795 6,989
Mr. Zoghbi 363,138 4,676 15,588
Under the 2016our Bonus Swap Program, eligible employees were offered an opportunity to use either 25% or 50% (the “Swap Election Percentage”) of their calculated net bonus for 2015 (after deducting an amount based on a theoretical tax determined based on the employee’s country of residence) to purchase common shares of Kraft Heinz. The number of Investment Shares purchased is calculated as the product of the

calculated net bonus and the Swap Election Percentage, divided by the closing price on the NASDAQ on the date of purchase. Employees who elected to purchase Investment Shares also received RSUs, called Bonus Matching RSUs, based on the elected percentage of their gross bonus and their level within the organization. The Bonus Matching RSUs are subject to forfeiture if an employee resigns or sells the related Investment Shares prior to the vesting date of the Bonus Matching RSUs. Under our swap program, so long as the matching stock optionsMatching Options or Bonus Matching RSUs remain unvested, if an employee transfers any of the related Investment Shares, he or she immediately forfeits a proportional amount of the corresponding matching stock optionsMatching Options or Bonus Matching RSUs. While we do not mandate minimum ownership guidelines, this featureThe Committee believes that the Bonus Swap Program as a whole, and the forfeitability of our swap program encouragesthe Matching Options and Matching RSUs in particular, strongly motivates eligible employees to hold their Investment Shares,Kraft Heinz common stock for the long-term, further aligning the interests of our employees with the interests of our stockholders.

emphasizing a long-term view in creating stockholder value.

Discretionary Stock Option Awards

From time to time, we may make discretionary stock option awards to employees, at such time as the Board,employees. On March 1, 2016, the Committee or authorized members of management determine appropriate.granted 38,630 stock options to Mr. Romaneiro. Stock options are granted with an exercise price based on the value of Kraft Heinz common stock on the grant date and thus have value only to the extent that the value of Kraft Heinz increases after the grant date. Stock options typically cliff vest over a five year period. Each NEO agreed, pursuant toperiod and the stock option award agreements toalso contain non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants. In 2015, we made special stock option grants to certain employees following
Zoghbi Compensation Arrangement
Upon the closing of the 2015 Merger, we entered into the 2015 Offer Letter with Mr. Zoghbi, who had served as Chief Operating Officer of Kraft Foods prior to recognize these individuals’ high potential, strongthe merger and, before that, had served as Kraft Foods’ Vice Chairman, Operations, R&D, Sales and Strategy. Retention of Mr. Zoghbi was critical in order to provide continuity of leadership for our U.S. commercial business as we embarked on the large scale and complex integration of Kraft and Heinz. Pursuant to the 2015 Offer Letter, in 2016, Mr. Zoghbi received: (i) a base salary of $850,000; (ii) a 2016 special incentive bonus with a target payment of $10 million (and a minimum guaranteed payout of $7 million), based on performance in net cost savings (40%), sales growth (40%), and valued leadership.innovation (20%); and (iii) a $4 million retention bonus conditioned on Mr. Zoghbi’s continued employment with Kraft Heinz through January 1, 2017. In addition, thesein order to diminish Mr. Zoghbi’s incentives to resign and trigger his double-trigger compensation rights under legacy Kraft compensation plans, stock option awards serveoptions and RSUs granted to Mr. Zoghbi under the Kraft Foods Group, Inc. 2012 Performance Incentive Plan (the “Kraft Plan”) vested effective as key retention instruments for these employees. On August 20, 2015, each of the following NEOs receiveddate of the 2015 Offer Letter. Consistent with the treatment for all Kraft Foods employees who held performance shares issued under the Kraft Plan, Mr. Zoghbi’s Kraft Foods performance shares converted into cash payable in two installments upon completion of the 2015 Merger pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 24, 2015. The 2015 Offer Letter also provided Mr. Zoghbi with the opportunity to elect to exchange up to $5 million from Mr. Zoghbi’s 2016 special incentive bonus into common stock, which will be matched with three times the invested value in stock options, similar to Kraft Heinz’s Bonus Swap Program.
Effective January 1, 2017, we entered into a new offer letter with Mr. Zoghbi (the “2017 Offer Letter”). Under the 2017 Offer Letter, Mr. Zoghbi will: (i) continue his current base salary of $850,000; (ii) have a target annual incentive award opportunity of 200% (with a maximum bonus multiplier of 130%); and (iii) receive a long-term incentive grant, as follows:

NameThe 2017 Offer Letter eliminated the Section 280G gross up rights that Mr. Zoghbi had been granted by legacy Kraft compensation plans prior to the 2015 Merger

Stock Options
(#)

Mr. Hees

202,021

Mr. Basilio

134,681

Mr. Pelleissone

67,341

Mr. Piani

202,021

.

Retirement Programs

Kraft Heinz maintains defined contribution retirement plans to allow employees to save for retirement in a tax-efficient manner. These plans are broadly available to eligible employees and do not discriminate in favor of the

NEOs or other members of senior management. None of the NEOs participate in any defined benefit pension plans, non-qualified deferred compensation plans or supplemental retirement or executive savings plans.

Health and Welfare Benefits

Kraft Heinz provides health and welfare insurance benefits to employees, including the NEOs. The Kraft Heinz health and welfare plans are broadly available to eligible employees and do not discriminate in favor of the NEOs or other members of senior management.

Limited Perquisites

From time to time, Kraft Heinz provides limited perquisite benefits. In 2015, Kraft Heinz provided relocation benefits to Messrs. Basilio and Pelleissone2016, Mr. Hees received a housing allowance in connection with his service in our co-headquarters. In connection with his relocation to our co-headquarters in Chicago andSingapore, we provide a housing allowance to Mr. Piani in connection with relocation to our Canada headquarters in Toronto, Canada.Romaneiro. Similarly, on occasion, Kraft Heinz providedprovides limited tax supportadvisory services and immigration benefits to eachsome of the NEOs for business reasons.

Minimum Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our compensation programs promote a strong alignment of the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. For example, in order to participate in our Bonus Swap Program, each participant must use a significant portion of his or her bonus to purchase our common stock. In 2016, we adopted minimum stock ownership guidelines, which require our named executive officers to attain levels of beneficial stock ownership measured based on a multiple of his or her annual base salary, as set forth below:
RoleMinimum Ownership
CEO5x Base Salary
Other Named Executive Officers3x Base Salary
The stock ownership guidelines require named executive officers to attain levels of beneficial stock ownership within five years from the later of December 8, 2016 and the date of the named executive officer’s appointment to a position subject to the guidelines. For more details on the stock ownership of our named executive officers, please refer to the “Ownership of Equity Securities.”
Clawback, Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies.

Policies

Our stock option and RSU award agreements provide that, in certain circumstances, the award and any proceeds or other benefits a participant may receive may be subject to forfeiture and/or repayment to Kraft Heinz to the extent required to comply with any requirements imposed under applicable laws and/or the rules. Further, if a participant receives any amount in excess of what he or she should have received under the terms of the award for any reason (including without limitation by reason of a financial restatement, mistake in calculations or administrative error), all as determined by the Committee, then he or she will be required to promptly repay any such excess amount to Kraft Heinz. Our insider trading policy also limits the timing and types of transactions in Kraft Heinz securities by executive officers, including our NEOs. Among other restrictions, the policy prohibits holding Kraft Heinz securities in a margin account or pledging Kraft Heinz securities as collateral for a loan, short-selling Kraft Heinz securities, transacting in puts, calls or other derivatives on Kraft Heinz securities or hedging transactions on Kraft Heinz securities.

Impact of Tax and Accounting Policies
As a general matter, it is our policy to consider the tax and accounting treatment of our compensation arrangements when designing the arrangements and making compensation decisions, including the tax deductibility of the compensation. Under section 162(m) of the Code, our ability to deduct compensation paid to our CEO and our next three highest paid executive officers, other than our CFO (the covered employees), is generally limited to $1.0 million annually unless the excess compensation qualifies as performance-based compensation. For 2016, the annual cash bonus award, stock options, and RSUs awarded to covered employees were subject to, and intended to be made in accordance with, performance-based compensation arrangements previously implemented that were intended to qualify as tax deductible. The Committee has retained the discretion to authorize payments that may not be tax deductible, if it believes that such payments are in the best interest of shareholders.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal

Position

 Year Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards(1)
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
($)
  Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)
  All Other
Compensation(3)
($)
  Total
Compensation(4)
($)

Bernardo Hees

 2015  1,000,000    —      —     2,878,583  1,450,000    —         39,455   5,368,038

Chief Executive

 2014  1,000,000    —      —        542,376  1,215,000    —         56,358   2,813,734

Officer

 2013     561,538    —      —     7,290,000  1,166,667    —         24,821   9,043,026

Paulo Basilio

 2015     550,000    —      —     1,869,511     600,000    —      414,270   3,433,781

Chief Financial

 2014     500,000    —      —        209,699     700,000    —         26,552   1,436,251

Officer

 2013     280,769    —      —     2,916,000     437,500    —      152,406   3,786,675

Eduardo

 2015     550,000    —      —        889,716     600,000    —      453,338   2,493,054

Pelleissone

 2014     500,000    —         203,323     500,000    —         55,189   1,258,512

EVP, Global Operations

         

Carlos Piani

 2015     169,481    —      —     2,331,322     155,559    —      248,706   2,905,068

Zone President of Canada

         

Matthew Hill

 2015     542,796    —      16,962      267,614     535,151    —      162,969   1,525,492

Zone President of Europe

 2014     583,903    —      18,247      119,352     690,815    —         84,600   1,496,917

Name and 
Principal Position
 Year 
Salary
($)
 
Bonus
($)
 
Stock
Awards(1)
($)
 
Option
Awards(2)
($)
 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(3) ($)
 
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 
All Other
Compensation(4)
($)
 
Total
Compensation(5)
($)
Bernardo Hees
Chief Executive Officer
 2016 1,000,000
  1,449,990
  2,730,574
  92,027
 5,272,591
 2015 1,000,000
   2,878,583
 1,450,000
  39,455
 5,368,038
 2014 1,000,000
   542,376
 1,215,000
  56,358
 2,813,734
                   
Paulo Basilio
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 2016 600,000
  599,924
 
 1,500,000
  48,656
 2,748,580
 2015 550,000
   1,869,511
 600,000
  414,270
 3,433,781
 2014 500,000
   209,699
 700,000
  26,552
 1,436,251
                   
Eduardo Pelleissone
EVP of Global Operations
 2016 600,000
  599,924
 
 1,415,810
  27,555
 2,643,289
 2015 550,000
   889,716
 600,000
  453,338
 2,493,054
 2014 500,000
   203,323
 500,000
  55,189
 1,258,512
                   
Marcos Romaneiro
Zone President of AMEA
 2016 395,437
  542,766
 479,012
 484,635
  187,400
 2,089,250
 2015 414,130
   240,929
 556,010
  240,897
 1,451,966
 2014 445,362
   614,523
 434,410
  249,279
 1,743,574
                   
George Zoghbi
Chief Operating Officer of U.S. Commercial Business (6)
 2016 850,000
 7,000,000
 1,210,564
  3,000,000
 17,237 57,777
 12,135,578
                   
(1)The value ofamounts shown in this column include the stock option awards is equal to theiraggregate grant date fair value asof the Matching RSUs computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of the stock option awards in this column, see Note 9,8, “Employees’ Stock Incentive Plans” in the section entitled “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3,December 31, 2016. For a discussion of the terms applicable to the Matching RSUs, as well as vesting, forfeiture and other terms, see “Elements of Compensation Program — Annual Bonus Swap Program — Restricted Stocks Units” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
(2)Amounts shown in this column, include the aggregate grant date fair value of (i) Bonus Matching Options granted in 2015 and 2014 under our Bonus Swap Program, and (ii) discretionary option awards granted to the NEOs in the respective year. The value of the stock option awards is equal to their grant date fair value as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and, where applicable, reflect the conversion in connection with the 2015 Merger. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of the stock option awards in this column, see Note 8, “Employees’ Stock Incentive Plans” in the section entitled “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

(2)
(3)Amounts reported in this column reflect the 20152016 Performance Bonus Plan awards.awards that were attributable to either actual business unit or individual performance results against target goals. For Mr. Zoghbi, the performance targets were established pursuant to the 2015 Offer Letter, see "Elements of Compensation Program — Zoghbi Compensation Arrangement" in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The bonuses were paid in cash to each NEO after the end of 2015. Mr. Piani, who joined the company in September 2015, received a pro-rata payment.2016.

(3)
(4)For Mr. Hees, represents a matching contribution to the Kraft Heinz 401(k), immigration benefits, basic life insurance coverage and other allowances for housing.housing ($27,544). For Mr. Basilio, represents a matching contribution to the Kraft Heinz 401(k), relocation ($387,872) and immigration benefits and basic life insurance coverage. For Mr.Messrs. Zoghbi and Pelleissone, represents a matching contribution to the Kraft Heinz 401(k), relocation ($411,979) and immigration benefits, tax support and basic life insurance coverage. For Mr. Piani,Romaneiro, represents a matching contribution to the Kraft Heinz 401(k), relocation and other allowances for housing ($243,291), and basic life insurance coverage. For Mr. Hill, represents a matching contribution to a U.K. defined contribution scheme ($54,280), a payment in lieu of defined benefit pension benefits ($91,258) and a car allowance.149,966). Amounts also include dividend equivalents that accrued on Matching RSUs.

(4)
(5)Foreign currency conversion based on daily average for calendar year 2015.2016. Mr. Piani’sRomaneiro’s compensation was converted based on 0.7840.695 USD/CAD. Mr. Hill’s compensation was converted based on 1.529 USD/GBP.SGD.

(6)See “Elements of Compensation Program — Zoghbi Compensation Arrangement” for a discussion on Mr. Zoghbi’ s 2015 Offer Letter, entered into upon the closing of the 2015 Merger.



GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

The following table sets forth information regarding the grant of plan-based awards for each of the NEOs in 2015.

       Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
  Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity

Incentive
Plan Awards
 All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or

Units
(#)
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
  Exercise
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Share)
  Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)
 

Name                

 Grant Date  Grant
Type
 Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
    

Mr. Hees

  PBP(1)  2,000,000    2,600,000        
  8/20/2015   Options       202,021    74.25    2,331,322  
  2/12/2015   Matching
Options
       71,819    30.46    547,261  

Mr. Basilio

  PBP(1)  825,000    1,072,500        
  8/20/2015   Options       134,681    74.25    1,554,219  
  2/12/2015   Matching
Options
       41,377    30.46    315,293  

Mr. Pelleissone

  PBP(1)  825,000    1,072,500        
  8/20/2015   Options       67,341    74.25    777,115  
  2/12/2015   Matching
Options
       14,777    30.46    112,601  

Mr. Piani

  PBP(1)  250,739    325,960        
  8/20/2015   Options       202,021    74.25    2,331,322  

Mr. Hill

  PBP(1)  814,194    1,058,452        
  2/12/2015   Matching
Options
       35,120    30.46    267,614  

2016.
      
Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
 
Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards
 All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) 
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
 
Exercise
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Share)
 
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)
Name                 Grant Date 
Grant
Type
 
Target
($)
 
Maximum
($)
 
Target
(#)
 
Maximum
(#)
 
Mr. Hees   
PBP(1)
 2,500,000 3,250,000            
  3/1/2016 
Matching
RSUs
         18,671     1,449,990
Mr. Basilio   
PBP(1)
 1,200,000 1,560,000            
  3/1/2016 
Matching
RSUs
         7,725     599,924
Mr. Pelleissone   
PBP(1)
 1,200,000 1,560,000            
  3/1/2016 
Matching
RSUs
         7,725     599,924
Mr. Romaneiro   
PBP(1)
 593,156 771,103            
  3/1/2016 Options           38,630 77.66 479,012
  3/1/2016 
Matching
RSUs
         6,989     542,766
Mr. Zoghbi   
PBP(1)
 3,000,000 3,000,000            
  3/1/2016 
Matching
RSUs
         15,588     1,210,564
(1)Mr. Hees’Hees’s target amount reflects the target award of 200%250% of base salary. The target award for each of Messrs. Basilio and Pelleissone Pianiwas 200% of base salary and Hill isthe target award for Mr. Romaneiro was 150% of base salary. The minimum amount is $0 and the maximum amount reflects 130% of the target amount.amount for all NEOs except Mr. Piani’s amounts reflect a pro-rata calculation for 4 months since he joined Kraft Heinz in September 2015.Zoghbi. The actual payment is based on achievement of individual and corporate performance goals. Annual incentive award payments were made in cash to each NEO after the end of 20152016 based on actual results achieved. Actual amounts earned are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table under the column entitled “Non-Equity"Non Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”Compensation". The target award for Mr. Zoghbi was established pursuant to his 2015 Offer Letter. For a description of Mr. Zoghbi’s special incentive bonus, please review the information in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “Elements of Compensation Program — Zoghbi Compensation Arrangement.”


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END


The following table sets forth each NEO’s outstanding equity awards, as of the end of 2015.

2016.
      Option Awards Stock Awards
Name Grant Date Grant Type 
Number
of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
 
Number
of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 
Option
Expiration
Date
 
Number of
Shares
or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#) (1)
 
Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested(2)
($)
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
Mr. Hees 3/1/2016 RSU-match          19,190
 1,675,671
    
  8/20/2015 Stock Options   202,021
 
(3) 
74.25
 8/20/2025        
  2/12/2015 Stock Options   71,819
 
(4) 
30.46
 2/12/2025        
  2/14/2014 Stock Options   98,951
 
(5) 
22.56
 2/14/2024        
  7/1/2013 Stock Options  1,329,996
 
(6) 
22.56
 7/1/2023        
Mr. Basilio 3/1/2016 RSU-match          7,939
 693,233
    
  8/20/2015 Stock Options   134,681
 
(3) 
74.25
 8/20/2025        
  2/12/2015 Stock Options   41,377
 
(4) 
30.46
 2/12/2025        
  2/14/2014 Stock Options   38,257
 
(5) 
22.56
 2/14/2024        
  7/1/2013 Stock Options   531,998
 
(6) 
22.56
 7/1/2023        
Mr. Pelleissone 3/1/2016 RSU-match          7,939
 693,233
    
  8/20/2015 Stock Options   67,341
 
(3) 
74.25
 8/20/2025        
  2/12/2015 Stock Options   14,777
 
(4) 
30.46
 2/12/2025        
  2/14/2014 Stock Options   37,094
 
(5) 
22.56
 2/14/2024        
  7/1/2013 Stock Options   443,332
 
(6) 
22.56
 7/1/2023        
Mr. Romaneiro 3/1/2016 RSU-match          7,183
 627,220
    
  3/1/2016 Stock Options   38,630
 
(7) 
77.66
 3/1/2026        
  2/12/2015 Stock Options   31,618
 
(4) 
30.46
 2/12/2025        
  5/21/2014 Stock Options   88,666
 
(8) 
22.56
 5/21/2024        
  2/14/2014 Stock Options   22,353
 
(5) 
22.56
 2/14/2024        
  7/1/2013 Stock Options   265,999
 
(6) 
22.56
 7/1/2023        
Mr. Zoghbi 3/1/2016 RSU-match          16,021
 1,398,954
    
  2/26/2015 Stock Options 61,110
    52.70
 2/26/2025        
  2/27/2014 Stock Options 52,212
    45.59
 2/27/2024        
  2/25/2013 Stock Options 50,757
    38.63
 2/25/2023        
  2/23/2012 Stock Options 16,720
    32.54
 2/23/2022        
                      
(1)Option AwardsStock AwardsFor all Matching RSUs, dividends are reinvested at the dividend payment date in additional RSUs that are subject to the same restrictions as the original grant.

Name

Grant DateGrant TypeNumber
of  Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
Number
of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number
of
Shares
or

Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested

(#)
Market
Value

of
Shares
or

Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested(5)
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units

or
Other
Rights
That
Have

Not
Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market

or
Payout
Value

of
Unearned
Shares,
Units

or
Other
Rights
That
Have

Not
Vested
($)

Mr. Hees

8/20/2015Stock Options202,021(1)74.258/20/2025
(2)The market value of the shares that have not vested is based on the closing price of $87.32 for Kraft Heinz common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of our fiscal year, as reported on NASDAQ.
2/12/2015Stock Options71,819(2)30.462/12/2025
2/14/2014Stock Options98,951(3)22.562/14/2024
7/1/2013Stock Options1,329,996(4)22.567/1/2023

Mr. Basilio

8/20/2015Stock Options134,681(1)74.258/20/2025
2/12/2015Stock Options41,377(2)30.462/12/2025
2/14/2014Stock Options38,257(3)22.562/14/2024
7/1/2013Stock Options531,998(4)22.567/1/2023

Mr. Pelleissone

8/20/2015Stock Options67,341(1)74.258/20/2025
2/12/2015Stock Options14,777(2)30.462/12/2025
2/14/2014Stock Options37,094(3)22.562/14/2024
7/1/2013Stock Options443,332(4)22.567/1/2023

Mr. Piani

8/20/2015Stock Options202,021(1)74.258/20/2025

Mr. Hill

2/12/2015Stock Options35,120(2)30.462/12/2025
2/14/2014Stock Options21,774(3)22.562/14/2024
7/1/2013Stock Options221,666(4)22.567/1/2023
12/1/2013Cash Equivalent
RSU Replacement
$33,925(5)

(1)100% of the award is scheduled to vest on August 20, 2020.

(2)
(4)100% of the award is scheduled to vest on February 12, 2020. Options and exercise price updated to reflect the conversion post-2015in connection with the 2015 Merger.

(3)
(5)100% of the matching options areaward is scheduled to vest on February 14, 2019. Options and exercise price updated to reflect the conversionpost-2015 in connection with the 2015 Merger.

(4)
(6)100% of the award is scheduled to vest on July 1, 2018. Options and exercise price updated to reflect the conversion post-2015in connection with the 2015 Merger.

(5)Value
(7)100% of units under Cash Equivalent RSU Replacement award determined based on the 2013 merger consideration of $72.50 per share. In December 2013, we established a cash-based RSU replacement award for those who were previously eligible for an annual grant of performance-based RSUs. The award was meant to replace the award opportunity during the 6-month period of Julyis scheduled to vest on March 1, 2013 to December 29, 2013. The award vests 25% on each anniversary2021.
(8)100% of the grant date.award is scheduled to vest on May 21, 2019. Options and exercise price updated to reflect the conversion in connection with the 2015 Merger.



OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE

The following table sets forth the stock options exercised by the NEOs and the RSUs that vested for the NEOs in 2015:

2016:
  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name(1)
 
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise
(#)
 
Value
Realized
on
Exercise
($)
 
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting
(#)
 
Value
Realized
on
Vesting(2)
($)
Mr. Zoghbi 
 
 8,487
 617,514
(1)Messrs. Hees, Basilio, Pelleissone and Romaneiro are excluded because they neither exercised any stock options nor had any vested stock awards in 2016. For Mr. Zoghbi, relates to the January 1, 2016 vesting of deferred compensation units in connection with the termination of the Kraft Foods Group Management Stock Purchase Plan.
(2)The amounts shown are calculated based on the close price fair market value of our common stock on the date of vesting.
PENSION BENEFITS TABLE
Name(1)
 Plan Name 
Number of Years of Credited Service(2)
(#)
 
Present Value of Accumulated Benefits(3) 
($)
 
Payments During Last Fiscal Year (4)($)
Mr. Zoghbi Kraft Foods Group, Inc. Retirement Plan 6.25 169,307
 
  Kraft Foods Group, Inc. Supplemental Plan I 6.25 
 473,430
(1) Messrs. Hees, Basilio, Pelleissone and Romaneiro are excluded because they were not eligible to participate in the legacy Kraft pension plans.
(2) The years of credited service under the plan are equivalent to the years of total U.S. service for Mr. Zoghbi through December 31, 2016.
(3) The amounts reflect the actuarial present value of benefits accumulated under the retirement plan, in accordance with the same assumptions and measurement dates disclosed in the consolidated financial statements contained in our Form 10-K. The assumptions for the plan are as follows:
Assumes commencement at the earliest age that participants would be eligible for an unreduced pension benefit, which is age 65 for Mr. Zoghbi. Present value amounts are discounted for current age;
Measurement date of December 31, 2016;
Retirement Plan lump sum discount rate of 4.19%;
RP 2016 Generational Scale MP-2016 Mortality Table; and
Present values are calculated as of December 31, 2016.
(4) Effective December 31, 2015, the Kraft Foods nonqualified plans were terminated, which resulted in a lump sum payment to Mr. Zoghbi in early 2016.
NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE
Name(1)
 Option Awards
Executive Contributions
in 2016
($)
 
Registrant Contributions
Stock Awardsin 2016

Name(2)

($)
 
Aggregate Earnings
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise
(#)
in 2016
(2)
($)
 
Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions
Value
Realized
on
Exercise
in 2016
(2)
($)
 Number
Aggregate Balance as of
Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized
on
Vesting(1)
December 31, 2016
($)
Mr. HeesZoghbi 
 
 
 310,354
 

Mr. Basilio

—  —  —  —  

Mr. Pelleissone

—  —  —  —  

Mr. Piani

—  —  —  —  

Mr. Hill

—  —  —  16,962

(1)Value of units under Cash Equivalent RSU Replacement award determined based on the 2013 merger consideration of $72.50 per share. In December 2013, our senior management established a cash-based RSU replacement award for those who were previously
(1)Messrs. Hees, Basilio, Pelleissone and Romaneiro are excluded because theywere not eligible for an annual grant of performance-based RSUs. The award was meant to replace the award opportunity during the 6-month period of July 1, 2013 to December 29, 2013. The award vests 25% on each anniversary of the grant date.

PENSION BENEFITS TABLE

None of the NEOs participate in any defined benefit or supplemental retirement plans or programs. As a result, the Pension Benefits Table has been omitted.

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

None of the NEOs participate in anycompany non-qualified deferred compensation plans.

(2) Effective December 31, 2015, the Kraft Foods nonqualified plans or programs. Aswere terminated, which resulted in a result, the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table has been omitted.

lump sum payment to Mr. Zoghbi in early 2016.



POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

The tables, footnotes and narratives below reflect the assumption that a hypothetical termination of employment or change in control occurred on the last day of 2015.

Name                

     Involuntary
Term. without
Cause(1) or Term.
upon Change

in Control
($)
   Other Types  of
Separations(2)
($)
 

Mr. Hees

      
  Salary   1,000,000     —    
  Bonus   —       1,450,000  
  Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Stock Options(3)   3,024,471     3,024,471  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL

     4,024,471     4,474,471  

Mr. Basilio

      
  Salary   600,000     —    
  Bonus   —       600,000  
  Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Stock Options(3)   1,208,335     1,208,335  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL

     1,808,335     1,808,335  

Mr. Pelleissone

    
  Salary   600,000     —    
  Bonus   —       600,000  
  Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Stock Options(3)   1,012,666     1,012,666  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL

     1,612,666     1,612,666  

Mr. Piani

      
  Salary   242,115     —    
  Bonus   —       155,559  
  Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Stock Options(3)   —       —    
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL

     242,115     155,559  

Mr. Hill

      
  Salary   542,796     —    
  Bonus   —       535,151  
  Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Stock Options(3)   509,869     509,869  
  Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Cash Replacement RSUs   33,925     33,925  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL

     1,086,589     1,078,944  

2016.
Name                 Element                
Involuntary
Term. without
Cause (1) or Term.
upon Change
in Control
($)
 
Other Types  of
Separations (2)
($)
Mr. Hees      
  Salary 1,000,000
 
  Bonus 
 2,730,574
  
Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 55,586,360
 55,586,360
  
Health & Welfare Benefits(4)
 36,982
 
TOTAL   56,623,342
 58,316,934
Mr. Basilio      
  Salary 600,000
 
  Bonus 
 1,500,000
  
Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 22,484,919
 22,484,919
  
Health & Welfare Benefits(4)
 38,872
 
TOTAL   23,123,791
 23,984,919
Mr. Pelleissone    
  Salary 600,000
 
  Bonus 
 1,415,810
  
Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 18,531,065
 18,531,065
  
Health & Welfare Benefits(4)
 38,872
 
TOTAL   19,169,936
 19,946,875
Mr. Romaneiro    
  Salary 395,437
 
  Bonus 
 484,635
  
Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 13,571,053
 13,571,053
  
Health & Welfare Benefits(4)
 23,472
 
TOTAL   13,989,963
 14,055,688
Mr. Zoghbi    
  
Bonus(5)
 14,000,000
 14,000,000
  
Health & Welfare Benefits(4)
 14,576
 
TOTAL   14,014,576
 14,000,000
       
(1)No enhanced severance is provided on a termination in connection with a change in control. Kraft Heinz does not have a specified Change in Control Plan for executives and treatment is determined by the plan agreements applicable to each employee. Our severance pay plan provides for 12 months of base salary with a signed release of claims. Mr. Piani would be eligible for 6 months of severance with a signed release of claims. Severance plan would also include company-paid COBRA for the severance period and outplacement services. We do not have a specified change in control plan for executives and treatment is determined by the plan agreements applicable to each employee.

(2)Relates to termination due to death, disability or normal retirement.

(3)In the event of a termination without cause or due to retirement, death or disability, stock options vest as if 20% of the options vested on each annual anniversary date of the specific grant. Amounts reflect the intrinsic value of shares underlying options that would vest, calculated as the difference between $87.32, the closing price of Kraft Heinz common stock on December 30, 2016 (the last trading day of our fiscal year, as reported on NASDAQ), and the exercise price of the options. RSUs are not presented in this table because no pro rata vesting would occur if such event occurs prior to the second anniversary of the grant.

(4)Amount reflects 18 months of medical and dental benefit coverage continuation for Messrs. Hees, Basilio, Pelleissone and Romaneiro and 12 months for Mr. Zoghbi.
(5)Pursuant to the terms of his 2015 Offer Letter, upon termination due to death or disability, Mr. Zoghbi would have been entitled to receive the greater of (i) a pro rata portion of the 2016 Guaranteed Minimum Bonus or (ii) a pro rata portion of the Special Incentive Bonus based on the actual performance results for the 2016 fiscal year. Furthermore, Mr. Zoghbi would have been entitled to a full payment of his $4,000,000 retention bonus if his employment was terminated without cause or due to death or disability.


Severance Pay Plan

NEOs are eligible for benefits under the Severance Pay Plan upon an involuntary termination of employment, such as job elimination, location closing, or reduction in the workforce. NEOs must be willing to provide satisfactory transitional assistance in order to be eligible for severance benefits.

Under the Severance Pay Plan, Messrs. Hees, Basilio, Pelleissone and HillRomaneiro would be eligible to receive a severance payment equal to 12 months of base salary upon the execution of a release of claims against Kraft Heinz. Mr. Piani would be eligible to receive a severance payment equal to 6 months of base salary upon the execution of a release of claims against Kraft Heinz. Severance payments are generally made in a cash lump sum,lump-sum, but may occasionally be made in periodic payments at Kraft Heinz’s discretion as soon as administratively feasible after the termination of employment and after the former NEO’s executed release has become irrevocable.

In the event that an NEO is rehired within one year after such termination of employment, the NEO will be required to refund to Kraft Heinz the portion of any severance pay that exceeded the amount of earnings the individual would have received as an employee of Kraft Heinz between the time of termination and rehire.

No enhanced severance is provided on a termination in connection with a change in control of Kraft Heinz, and, other than the arrangement with Mr. Zoghbi, Kraft Heinz does not maintain any individual change in control severance or other similar agreements with any of the NEOs. None of the NEOs are entitled to receive a gross-up for golden parachute taxes that may become payable pursuant to Section 280G of the Code in connection with a change in control of Kraft Heinz.

Equity Awards under 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan

In

Generally, in the event of involuntary termination without cause, retirement, death, and disability, the stock options granted to the NEOs would vest as if 20% of the shares vested on each annual anniversary date of the specific grant. For all other terminations and for voluntary resignations, the unvested stock options will be forfeited. Beginning on the termination date, the exercise period is 90 days for termination without cause and resignation and one year for retirement, death and disability. Upon a change in control of Kraft Heinz, there is accelerated vesting for all unvested stock options, unless the awards are assumed or otherwise continued.


OWNERSHIP OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of February 22, 2016,18, 2017, unless otherwise noted, by each director and Named Executive Officer, as well as the number of shares beneficially owned by all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. None of our common stock owned by these individuals is subject to any pledge. Unless otherwise indicated, each of the named individuals has, to Kraft Heinz’s knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Beneficially
Owned
Shares(1)(2)
  Deferred
Stock/Additional
Underlying
Units(3)
   Total
Shares/Interests
Held
 

Directors:

     

Gregory E. Abel

   —        11,575     11,575  

Alexandre Behring

   —        22,293     22,293  

Warren E. Buffett

   325,442,152(4)   —         325,442,152(4) 

John T. Cahill

   781,338    2,906     784,244  

Tracy Britt Cool

   —        12,812     12,812  

L. Kevin Cox

   133    10,270     10,403  

Jeanne P. Jackson

   4,280    10,270     14,550  

Jorge Paulo Lemann

   —        11,575     11,575  

Mackey J. McDonald

   —        12,983     12,983  

John C. Pope

   10,197(5)   11,484     21,681  

Marcel Herrmann Telles

   —        11,575     11,575  

Named Executive Officers:

     

Bernardo Hees

   42,692    —         42,692  

Paulo Basilio

   19,908    —         19,908  

Eduardo Pelleissone

   14,199    —         14,199  

Carlos Piani

   —        —         —      

Matthew Hill

   14,265    —         14,265  

All directors and executive officers as a group (21 persons)(6)

   326,971,212    122,666     327,093,878  

Name of Beneficial Owner 
Beneficially
Owned Shares (1) (2)
  
Deferred
Stock (3)
 Total 
Directors:        
Gregory E. Abel 
   13,560
 13,560
 
Alexandre Behring 
   24,576
 24,576
 
Tracy Britt Cool 
   14,831
 14,831
 
Warren E. Buffett 325,442,152
(4) 
 
 325,442,152
(4) 
John T. Cahill 781,338
   4,649
 785,987
 
Feroz Dewan 
   713
 713
 
Jeanne P. Jackson 4,280
   12,232
 16,512
 
Jorge Paulo Lemann 
   13,560
 13,560
 
Mackey J. McDonald 
   15,024
 15,024
 
John C. Pope 10,197
(5) 
 13,482
 23,679
 
Marcel Herrmann Telles 
   13,560
 13,560
 
Named Executive Officers:        
Bernardo Hees 48,293
   
 48,293
 
Paulo Basilio 22,225
   
 22,225
 
Eduardo Pelleissone 16,516
   
 16,516
 
Marcos Romaneiro 17,086
   
 17,086
 
George Zoghbi 245,629
   
 245,629
 
All directors and executive officers as a group (21 persons)(6)
 326,990,054
   126,187
 327,116,241
 
(1)Excluding shares held by Berkshire Hathaway (see table below), individual directors and executive officers as well as all directors and executive officers as a group beneficially own less than 1% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of February 22, 2016.18, 2017.

(2)Includes the number of Kraft Heinz stock options that are exercisable, or will become exercisable, within 60 days after February 22, 201618, 2017 as follows: Mr. Cahill — 633,017633,017; Mr. Zoghbi — 180,799; and all of our current executive officers as a group — 376,563.205,652. For Mr. Savina, also includes 1,088 restricted stock units that will vest within 60 days of February 18, 2017.

(3)Includes RSUs and deferred shares held in the stock deferral plan under the Kraft Heinz Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Management Directors. These shares accumulate dividends, which are reinvested in common stock. For a description of these deferred shares, see “Compensation of Non-Employee Directors” above.

(4)See table below regarding beneficial owners of more than 5% of our issued and outstanding common stock.

(5)Includes 99 shares as to which Mr. Pope disclaims beneficial ownership, as the shares are held in trust for his children’s benefit.

(6)This group includes, in addition to the individuals named in the table, under the heading “Directors,” our current executive officers: Bernardo Hees, Paulo Basilio, Matthew Hill, Emin Mammadov, Rafael Oliveira, Carlos Piani, Eduardo Pelleissone, Marcos Romaneiro, Francisco Sa and James Savina and George Zoghbi.Savina.



The following table displays information about persons we know were the beneficial owners of more than 5% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of February 22, 2016.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
   Percent
of
Common
Stock*
 

3G Funds(1)
c/o 3G Capital, Inc.
600 Third Avenue 37th Floor
New York, New York 10016

   293,536,058     24.2%  

Warren E. Buffett(2)
Berkshire Hathaway
3555 Farnam Street
Omaha, Nebraska 68131

   325,442,152     26.8%  

18, 2017.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner 
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
 
Percent
of
Common
Stock (1)
3G Funds(2)
c/o 3G Capital, Inc.
600 Third Avenue 37th Floor
New York, New York 10016
 290,727,687 23.8%
Warren E. Buffett(3)
Berkshire Hathaway
3555 Farnam Street
Omaha, Nebraska 68131
 325,442,152 26.7%

*
(1)Calculated based on 1,214,721,3611,217,136,057 shares of our issued and outstanding common stock as of February 22, 2016.18, 2017.

(1)
(2)Based on the Schedule 13G13G/A filed on February 16, 201615, 2017 by (i) 3G Global Food Holdings, a Cayman Islands limited partnership, (ii) 3G Global Food Holdings GP LP, a Cayman Islands limited partnership (“3G Global Food Holdings GP”), (iii) 3G Capital Partners II LP, a Cayman Islands limited partnership (“3G Capital Partners II”), (iv) 3G Capital Partners Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (“3G Capital Partners Ltd”), and (v) 3G Capital Partners LP, a Cayman Islands limited partnership (“3G Capital Partners LP” and, together with 3G Global Food Holdings, 3G Global Food Holdings GP, 3G Capital Partners II and 3G Capital Partners LP, the “3G Funds”). According to the Schedule 13G13G/A filing, the 3G Funds own dispositive power over an aggregate of 293,536,058290,727,687 shares of Kraft Heinz common stock as of December 31, 2015.2016. As a result of the relationships described above under “Corporate Governance and Board Matters — Independence and Related Person Transactions,” Berkshire Hathaway, Mr. Buffett and the 3G Funds may be deemed to be a group for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and therefore may be deemed to hold 618,978,210616,169,839 shares of Kraft Heinz common stock.

(2)
(3)Based on the Schedule 13G13G/A filed on February 16, 201615, 2017 by Warren E. Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway. As a result of the relationships described above under “Corporate Governance and Board Matters — Independence and Related Person Transactions,” Berkshire Hathaway, Mr. Buffett and the 3G Funds may be deemed to be a group for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and therefore may be deemed to hold 618,978,210616,169,839 shares of Kraft Heinz common stock.


OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY BE
PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

We do not know of any matters, other than those described in this Proxy Statement, that may be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, your proxy gives authority to the persons designated as proxies to vote in accordance with their best judgment. The Chairman of the Annual Meeting may refuse to allow the presentation of a proposal or a nomination for the Board at the Annual Meeting if it is not properly submitted.

PROCEDURAL MATTERS AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS


1.
1.When and where is the Annual Meeting?

We will hold the Annual Meeting on Tuesday,Wednesday, April 21, 2016,19, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. EDT at the Offices of Reed Smith LLP, 225 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15222.

2.
2.Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

The Board established February 22, 201621, 2017 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the Annual Meeting. Stockholders holding shares of our common stock on the Record Date are entitled to (a) receive notice of the Annual Meeting, (b) attend the Annual Meeting and (c) vote on all matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, 1,214,721,3611,217,136,057 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

3.
3.Why am I receiving these proxy materials?

You have received the proxy materials because, as of the Record Date, you directly held, and had the right to vote, shares of Kraft Heinz common stock. In connection with our Board’s solicitation of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting, we are providing stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting with this Proxy Statement, our Form 10-K and a voting ballot (in the form of a proxy card, voting instruction form, or a unique control number that allows you to vote via the Internet or by phone). We refer to these materials collectively as the “proxy materials.” The proxy materials provide important information about Kraft Heinz and describe the voting procedures and the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

4.
4.What is the difference between registered holders and beneficial holders?

The most common ways in which stockholders hold Kraft Heinz stock are:

directly with our transfer agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (registered stockholders); and

indirectly through an account with an institutional or nominee holder of our stock such as a broker or bank who is the record holder of the stock (beneficial stockholder or stockholder in street name).

If you hold your shares as a registered stockholder, our agent provides the proxy materials to you and your vote instructs the proxies how to vote your shares.

If you hold your shares in street name as a beneficial stockholder, your broker, bank or other nominee provides the proxy materials to you. Your vote instructs your nominee how to vote your shares, and that nominee in turn instructs the proxies how to vote your shares. If you hold your shares beneficially in an employee benefit plan, your shares are voted by the trustee of the plan in accordance with the plan’s governing documents and applicable law.


5.
5.How is Kraft Heinz distributing proxy materials?

We are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders primarily via “Notice and Access” delivery. On or about March 3, 2016,2017, we mailed to our stockholders (other than those who previously requested email or paper delivery) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet. If you receive a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access the proxy materials and vote by going to a secure Web site. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive paper copies of our proxy materials in the mail on a one-time or ongoing basis, you may follow the instructions in the Notice for making this request. The Notice also contains instructions on how you may request to receive an electronic copy of our proxy materials by email on a one-time or ongoing basis.

6.
6.How may I request printed copies of the proxy materials?

We will send printed, paper copies of proxy materials free of charge to any stockholder who requests copies by using one of the following methods:

By telephone: Call free of charge 1-800-579-1639 in the United States and Canada;

Via the Internet: Access the Internet and go towww.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions to login and order copies; or

Via e-mail: Send us an e-mail atsendmaterial@proxyvote.com with the 16 digit control number in the subject line. Your e-mail must include the following information:

Via the Internet: Access the Internet and go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions to login and order copies; or
Via e-mail: Send us an e-mail at sendmaterial@proxyvote.com with the 16 digit control number in the subject line. Your e-mail must include the following information:
the 16-digit control number located in the box in the upper right-hand corner of your Notice;

your preference to receive (a) printed materials via mail or (b) an e-mail with links to the electronic materials;

an e-mail address; and

if you would like this election to apply to the delivery of materials for all future meetings, the word “Permanent” and the last 4 digits of your tax identification number in the e-mail.

These materials are also available at https://materials.proxyvote.com/500754.

7.
7.What is the quorum requirement?

A quorum will be present if a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote as of the Record Date is represented at the Annual Meeting, either in person or by proxy.

8.
8.What vote is needed to elect directors?

Our By-Laws provide that, to be elected at this Annual Meeting, a director nominee must receive more votes FOR than votes AGAINST. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered as votes FOR or votes AGAINST the nominees and will have no effect on the election of directors.

Under our Guidelines, in an uncontested election, if an incumbent director nominated for re-election receives a greater number of votes AGAINST than votes FOR, the director must tender his or her resignation to the Governance Committee for its consideration. The Governance Committee then recommends to the Board whether to accept the resignation. The director will continue to serve until the Board decides whether to accept the resignation, but will not participate in the Governance Committee’s recommendation or the Board’s action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. The Board will publicly disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days after certification of the election results. In contested elections, the voting standard is a plurality of votes cast.

9.
9.What vote is needed to approve the other proposals?

Approval of each proposal, other than the election of directors, requires the favorable vote of a majority of votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote thereon who are present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting; provided that in the case of Proposal 3 (Advisory Vote on the Frequency of an Executive Compensation Vote), if no option receives a majority of votes present, the outcome shall be determined by a plurality of votes present.meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered as votes cast and will have no effect on the matter.


10.
10.How do I vote my shares?

If you are aregistered stockholder, you may vote:

via the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com. The Internet voting system will be available until 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 20, 2016;

via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com. The Internet voting system will be available until 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 18, 2017;
by telephone. If you are located within the United States and Canada, call 1-800-690-6903 (toll-free) from a touch-tone telephone. The telephone voting system will be available until 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 20, 2016;

18, 2017;

by returning a properly executed proxy card. We must receive your proxy card before the polls close at the Annual Meeting on Thursday,Wednesday, April 21, 2016;19, 2017; or

in person at the Annual Meeting. Please refer to Question 19 below for information regarding attendance at the Annual Meeting.

If you hold your shares instreet name, you may vote:

via the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com (16-digit control number is required), by telephone or by returning a properly executed voting instruction form by mail, depending upon the method(s) your broker, bank or other nominee makes available; or

via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com (16-digit control number is required), by telephone or by returning a properly executed voting instruction form by mail, depending upon the method(s) your broker, bank or other nominee makes available; or
in person at the Annual Meeting. To do so, you must request a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and present it at the Annual Meeting. Please refer to Question 19 below for information regarding attendance at the Annual Meeting.

11.
11.What are broker non-votes?

As described above in Question 4, if you hold your shares in street name, your vote instructs your broker, bank or other nominee, as the holder of record, how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, your nominee has discretion to vote your shares on “routine” matters. The ratification of the selection of the independent auditors (Proposal 5)3) is the only item on the agenda for the Annual Meeting that is considered routine. If you do not provide voting instructions and your nominee votes your shares, your shares will be counted toward the quorum for the Annual Meeting and voted on Proposal 5,3, but they will not be voted on the other items on the agenda, resulting in “broker non-votes” with respect to those other items.

12.
12.I am a current/former Kraft or Kraft Heinz employee and have investments in the Kraft Heinz Stock Fund(s) of the Kraft Foods Group, Inc. Thrift/TIPHeinz Savings/KH Union Savings 401(k) Plans and/or the Kraft Heinz Canada Inc. Pension andULC Retirement Savings Program.Plan. Can I vote? If so, how do I vote?

Yes, you are entitled to vote, and your proxy card, or control number for voting electronically, includes all shares allocated to your Kraft Heinz Stock Fund account(s). Your vote directs the plan(s) trustee(s) how to vote the shares allocated to your Kraft Heinz Stock Fund account(s).

In order to direct the plan(s) trustee(s) how to vote the shares held in your Kraft Heinz Stock Fund account(s),you must vote these plan shares (whether by Internet, telephone or mailed proxy card) by 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 18, 201616, 2017. If your voting instructions or proxy card are not received by that time, the trustee(s) will vote the shares allocated to your account(s) in the same proportion as

the respective plan shares for which voting instructions have been timely received, unless contrary to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Please follow the instructions for registered stockholders described in Question 10 above to cast your vote. Note, however, that although you may attend the Annual Meeting, you may not vote shares held in your Kraft Heinz Stock Fund account(s) at the meeting.

13.
13.May I change or revoke my vote?

Yes. If you are a registered stockholder, any subsequent vote you cast will replace your earlier vote. This applies whether you vote by mailing a proxy card or by telephone or the Internet. You may also revoke an earlier vote by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Alternatively, you may revoke your proxy by submitting a written revocation to our Corporate Secretary at The Kraft Heinz Company, One PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222.

200 East Randolph Street, Suite 7600, Chicago, IL 60601.

If you hold your shares in street name, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee for specific instructions on how to change or revoke your vote.


14.
14.Who bears the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?

We bear the cost of soliciting your vote. Our directors, officers or employees may solicit proxies or votes in person, by telephone or by electronic communication. They will not receive any additional compensation for these solicitation activities.

We will enlist the help of banks, brokers and other nominee holders in soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting from their customers (i.e., beneficial stockholders) and reimburse those firms for related out-of-pocket expenses.

15.
15.What is “Householding”?

Unless you advised otherwise, if you hold your shares in street name and you and other residents at your mailing address share the same last name and also own shares of Kraft Heinz common stock in an account at the same broker, bank or other nominee, your nominee delivered a single Notice or set of proxy materials to your address. This method of delivery is known as householding. Householding reduces the number of mailings you receive, saves on printing and postage costs and helps the environment. Stockholders who participate in householding continue to receive separate voting instruction cards and control numbers for voting electronically. A stockholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of the Notice or proxy materials, now or in the future, should submit this request by writing Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York, 11717, or calling 1-866-540-7095. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials and wish to receive a single copy of these materials in the future should contact their broker, bank or other nominee to make this request.

If you are a registered stockholder or hold your shares in an employee benefit plan, we sent you and each registered or plan stockholder at your address separate Notices or sets of proxy materials.

16.
16.Are my votes confidential?

Yes. Your votes will not be disclosed to our directors, officers or employees, except (a) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements and to assert or defend claims for or against us, (b) in the case of a contested proxy solicitation, (c) if you provide a comment with your proxy or otherwise communicate your vote to us outside of the normal procedures or (d) as necessary to allow the inspector of election to certify the results.

17.
17.Who counts the votes?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will receive and tabulate the proxies, and a representative of Broadridge Financial Solutions will act as the inspector of election and will certify the results.

18.
18.How do I find out the voting results?

We expect to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting. We will disclose the final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC on or before April 27, 2016.25, 2017. The Form 8-K will be available athttp://ir.kraftheinzcompany.com/sec.cfm and on the SEC’s Web site atwww.sec.gov.

19.
19.What do I need to do if I would like to attend the Annual Meeting?

If you would like to attend the Annual Meeting, you must have been a stockholder of record on the Record Date and you must obtain an admission ticket in advance. Admission tickets can be printed by accessing the “Register for Meeting” link atwww.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided (you will need the 16-digit control number included on your proxy card, voting instruction form or notice). Requests for admission tickets will be processed in the order in which they are received and must be requested no later than April 15, 2016.12, 2017. Stockholders may direct questions about the admission tickets toannualmeeting@KraftHeinzCompany.com or by calling 1-847-646-5494. Due to space constraints and other security considerations, we are not able to admit the guests of either stockholders or their legal proxy holders. Seating at the Annual Meeting is available on a first-come, first-served basis. In addition to an admission ticket, you will be asked to present valid government-issued photographic identification, such as a driver’s license, to be admitted into the Annual Meeting.

Security measures may include bag search, metal detector and other search devices. The use of cameras (including cell phones with photographic capabilities), recording devices, smart phones and other electronic devices is strictly prohibited.

20.May I ask questions at the Annual Meeting?

Yes. Stockholders may ask questions and make remarks related to the matters being voted on as those matters are presented. If time permits, stockholders’ questions and comments of a more general nature may be addressed after the adjournment of the Annual Meeting.

2017



2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

We presently anticipate that the 20172018 annual meeting of stockholders will be held on or about April 19, 2017.

2018.

Under our By-Laws, a stockholder may nominate a candidate for election as a director or propose business for consideration at an annual meeting of stockholders by delivering written notice that contains certain required information to our Corporate Secretary. We must receive this written notice no later than 120 days, and no earlier than 150 days, before the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, to be considered at the 20172018 annual meeting of stockholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive a stockholder’s written notice of nomination or proposal on or after November 22, 201620, 2017 and on or before December 22, 2016.20, 2017. If we change the date of an annual meeting by more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the date of the previous year’s annual meeting, then we must receive this written notice no later than 120 days, and no earlier than 150 days, before the date of that annual meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of an annual meeting is less than 120 days prior to the date of such annual meeting, then we must receive this written notice no later than the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made by us.

Under SEC Rule 14a-8, a stockholder may submit a proposal for possible inclusion in a proxy statement for an annual meeting of stockholders by submitting the proposal and other required information to our principal executive offices. We must receive the proposal no later than 120 calendar days before the one-year anniversary date of the release date of our proxy statement for the previous year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, to be considered for inclusion in our 20172018 proxy statement, we must receive a stockholder’s submission of a proposal on or before the close of business on November 3, 2016.

2017.

Stockholders should mail all nominations and proposals to our Corporate Secretary at The Kraft Heinz Company, One PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222.200 East Randolph Street, Suite 7600, Chicago, Illinois 60601. You may obtain a copy of our By-Laws from our Corporate Secretary by written request to the same address.

LOGO
March 3, 2016James J. Savina

Senior Vice President, Global General

Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Appendix A

THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY

2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of The Kraft Heinz Company 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan is to attract, retain and reward those employees, directors and other individuals who are expected to contribute significantly to the success of the Company and its Subsidiaries, to incentivize such individuals to perform at the highest level, to strengthen the mutuality of interests between such individuals and the Company’s stockholders and, in general, to further the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:

3G” shall mean 3G Global Food Holdings, LP and its Affiliates.

Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Reference to a specific section of the Act or regulation thereunder shall include such section or regulation, any valid regulation or interpretation promulgated under such section, and any comparable provision of any future legislation or regulation amending, supplementing or superseding such section or regulation.

Affiliate” shall mean, as to any person or entity, any other person or entity that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with, such person or entity, or any person or entity in which any other person or entity has a significant equity interest, in either case as determined by the Committee.

Applicable Exchange” means NASDAQ or any other national stock exchange or quotation system on which the Shares may be listed or quoted.

Award” shall mean any Option, SAR, award of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Stock, annual or long-term Performance Award, Investment Rights, Other Stock-Based Award or Cash-Based Award granted under the Plan, which may be denominated or settled in Shares, cash or in such other forms as provided for herein or determined by the Committee from time to time in its sole discretion.

Award Agreement” shall mean an agreement (whether in written or electronic form) or other instrument or document evidencing any Award granted under the Plan, which may, but need not, be executed or acknowledged by a Participant.

Berkshire” shall mean Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and its Affiliates.

Blackout Period” means a period when a Participant is prohibited from trading in the Company’s securities pursuant to securities regulatory requirements or the Company’s insider trading policy or other applicable policy or requirement of the Company.

Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.

Cause” shall mean, for any Participant, the meaning given to such term in an employment agreement or Award Agreement, or in the absence of an employment agreement or Award Agreement (or if an employment agreement or Award Agreement does not define such term or a similar term) it shall mean with respect to such Participant any of the following: (i) the continued failure of such Participant to perform any portion of his or her duties, (ii) intentional misconduct by such Participant which is or is likely to be injurious to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, monetarily or otherwise, (iii) such Participant’s indictment for, or conviction of, a felony (including a plea of nolo contendere), (iv) such Participant’s negligent performance of his or her duties, (v) any material breach by such Participant of the terms of this Plan, an Award Agreement, an employment agreement or any other agreement with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to which such Participant is a party, (vi) a violation of the Company’s written policies regarding ethical business practices or any other serious violation of any written policy of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries;provided that in all instances “Cause” shall include a Participant’s resignation in circumstances where Cause (as defined herein or if applicable, in an employment agreement or Award Agreement) exists.

Cash-Based Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Plan and payable in cash at such time or times and subject to such terms and conditions as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

Change in Control” shall mean the occurrence of:

(i) any “person” (as defined in Section 13(d) of the Act) (other than 3G, Berkshire, the Company, its Affiliates or an employee benefit plan or trust maintained by the Company or its Affiliates, or any company owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Shares of the Company) becoming the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Act), directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities (excluding any “person” who becomes such a beneficial owner (x) in connection with a transaction described in paragraph (ii) below or (y) in connection with a distribution to them in their capacity as a member or partner (whether general or limited partners) in an investment fund sponsored by 3G);

(ii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or any parent thereof) more than 20% of the combined voting power or the total fair market value of the securities of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation;provided,however, that a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no person (other than those covered by the exceptions in paragraph (i) of this definition) acquires more than 50% of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities shall not constitute a Change in Control of the Company; or

(iii) during any period of 24 consecutive calendar months, individuals who were directors of the Company on the first day of such period (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board;provided,however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the first day of such period whose election, or nomination for election, by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors shall be considered as though such individual were an Incumbent Director, but excluding, for purposes of this proviso, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened proxy contest with respect to election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a “person” (as used in Section 13(d) of the Act), in each case other than the Board;

(iv) a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or the consummation of any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; other than such liquidation, sale or disposition to a person or persons who beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 20% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company at the time of the sale.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any Award that is characterized as “nonqualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, an event shall not be considered to be a Change in Control under the Plan for purposes of payment of such Award unless such event is also a “change in ownership,” a “change in effective control” or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” of the Company within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.

Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Any reference to any section of the Code shall also be a reference to any successor provision and any treasury regulation promulgated thereunder.

Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board or such other committee as may be designated by the Board. If the Board does not designate the Committee, references herein to the “Committee” shall refer to the Board.

Company” shall mean The Kraft Heinz Company.

Consultant” means a person or corporation engaged by the Company to provide services for an initial, renewable or extended period of 12 months or more.

Covered Employee” means an individual who is (i) a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, or any successor provision thereto, and (ii) any individual who is designated by the Committee, in its discretion, at the time of any Award or at any subsequent time, as reasonably expected to be a “covered employee” with respect to the taxable year of the Company in which any applicable Award will be paid.

Deferred Stock” shall mean a right to receive Shares or other Awards or a combination thereof at the end of a specified deferral period granted under Section 9.

Dividend Equivalent” means a right, granted to a Participant under the Plan, to receive cash, shares, other Awards or other property equal in value to dividends paid with respect to Shares.

Effective Date” shall mean the date of the Plan’s approval by the Board, subject to the approval of the Plan by the stockholders of the Company.

Fair Market Value” means, except as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, (i) with respect to any property other than Shares, the fair market value of such property determined by such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time by the Committee and (ii) with respect to Shares, as of any date, (A) the closing per-share sales price of Shares as reported by the Applicable Exchange for such stock exchange for such date or the prior trading day or, if there were no sales on such dates, on the closest preceding date on which there were sales of Shares or (B) in the event there shall be no public market for the Shares on such date, the fair market value of the Shares as determined in good faith by the Committee.

Incentive Stock Option” shall mean an option representing the right to purchase Shares from the Company, granted under and in accordance with the terms of Section 6, that is intended to be and is designated as an “Incentive Stock Option” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.

Investment Rights” shall mean an Award granted pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan.

Investment Rights Notice” shall mean the document(s) provided to a Participant evidencing an Award of Investment Rights to such Participant and setting forth the terms and conditions thereof, including the number Shares covered by such award, the per Share and aggregate purchase price for such Shares and the period during which the Participant may exercise the right to purchase such Shares.

NASDAQ” means the National Association of Securities Dealers Automatic Quotation System.

Non-Qualified Stock Option” shall mean an option representing the right to purchase Shares from the Company, granted under and in accordance with the terms of Section 6, that is not an Incentive Stock Option.

Option” shall mean an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option.

Other Stock-Based Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 12(a) of the Plan.

Participant” shall mean the recipient of an Award granted under the Plan.

Performance Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan.

Performance Formula” means, for a Performance Period, one or more objective formula(e) applied against the relevant Performance Goal to determine, with regard to the Performance Award of a particular Participant, whether all, some portion but less than all, or none of such Award has been earned for the Performance Period.

Performance Goals” means goals established by the Committee as contingencies for Awards to vest and/or become exercisable or distributable based on one or more of the performance goals set forth inExhibit A hereto.

Performance Period” means the period established by the Committee at the time any Performance Award is granted or at any time thereafter during which any Performance Goals specified by the Committee with respect to such Award are measured or must be satisfied.

Plan” shall mean The Kraft Heinz Company 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as the same may be amended from time to time.

Restricted Stock” shall mean any Share granted under Section 8.

Restricted Stock Unit” shall mean a contractual right granted under Section 8 that is denominated in Shares. Each Restricted Stock Unit represents a right to receive one Share or the value of one Share upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.

Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b -3 under Section 16(b) of the Act as then in effect or any successor provision.

SAR” or “Stock Appreciation Right” shall mean any right granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 7 to receive, upon exercise by the Participant, the excess of (i) the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date of exercise over (ii) the grant price of the right on the date of grant, or if granted in connection with an outstanding Option on the date of grant of the related Option, as specified by the Committee in its sole discretion, which, except in the case of Substitute Awards or in connection with an adjustment provided in Section 5(d), shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of one Share on such date of grant of the right or the related Option, as the case may be.

Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933 and all rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Reference to a specific section of the Securities Act or regulation thereunder shall include such section or regulation, any valid regulation or interpretation promulgated under such section, and any comparable provision of any future legislation or regulation amending, supplementing or superseding such section or regulation.

Service” shall mean the active performance of services for the Company or a Subsidiary by a person who is an employee or director of the Company or a Subsidiary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any Award that is characterized as “nonqualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, an event shall not be considered to be a termination of “Service” under the Plan for purposes of payment of such Award unless such event is also a “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.

Shares” shall mean shares of the common stock of the Company.

Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation of which stock representing at least 50% of the ordinary voting power is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company.

Substitute Awards” shall mean Awards granted in assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by a company acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines.

Transfer” means: (i) when used as a noun, any direct or indirect transfer, sale, assignment, pledge, hypothecation, encumbrance or other disposition (including the issuance of equity in any entity), whether for value or no value and whether voluntary or involuntary (including by operation of law), and (ii) when used as a verb, to directly or indirectly transfer, sell, assign, pledge, encumber, charge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of (including the issuance of equity

in any entity) whether for value or for no value and whether voluntarily or involuntarily (including by operation of law). “Transferred” and “Transferable” shall have a correlative meaning.

Unrestricted Pool” means a number of Shares equal to 5% of the total number of Shares available for issuance set forth in Section 5.

SECTION 3. Eligibility.

(a) Any employee, director, Consultant or other advisor of, or any other individual who provides services to, the Company or any Subsidiary, shall be eligible to be selected to receive an Award under the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, only eligible employees of the Company, its subsidiaries and its parent (as determined in accordance with Section 422(b) of the Code) are eligible to be granted Incentive Stock Options under the Plan. Eligibility for the grant of Awards and actual participation in the Plan shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(b) An individual who has agreed to accept employment by the Company or a Subsidiary shall be deemed to be eligible for Awards hereunder as of the date of such acceptance;providedthat vesting and exercise of Awards granted to such individual are conditioned upon such individual actually becoming an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary.

(c) Holders of Options and other types of Awards granted by a company acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines are eligible for grant of Substitute Awards hereunder.

SECTION 4. Administration.

(a) The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall be appointed by the Board and shall consist of three or more non-employee directors. To the extent required by applicable law, rule or regulation, it is intended that each member of the Committee shall (i) qualify as a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b -3, (ii) qualify as an “outside director” under Section 162(m) of the Code (or, alternatively, the Committee may designate a subcommittee or establish other procedures for purposes of satisfying the requirements of such section) and (iii) meet the independence requirements of the Applicable Exchange. The Board may designate one or more directors as alternate members of the Committee who may replace any absent or disqualified member at any meeting of the Committee. The Committee may delegate to one or more officers of the Company the authority to grant Awards except that such delegation shall not be applicable to any Award for a person then covered by Section 16 of the Act or a Covered Employee. The Committee may issue rules and regulations for administration of the Plan. It shall meet at such times and places as it may determine.

(b) Subject to Section 16 of the Plan, the Committee shall have the authority to adopt, alter and repeal such administrative rules, guidelines and practices governing the Plan and perform all acts, including the delegation of its responsibilities (to the extent permitted by applicable law and the rules of the Applicable Exchange), as it shall, from time to time, deem advisable; to construe and interpret the terms and provisions of the Plan and any Award issued under the Plan (and any agreements relating thereto); and to otherwise supervise the administration of the Plan. The Committee may correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or in any agreement relating thereto in the manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary to effectuate the purpose and intent of the Plan. The Committee may adopt special guidelines and provisions for persons who are residing in or employed in, or subject to, the taxes of, any domestic or foreign jurisdictions to comply with applicable tax and securities laws of such domestic or foreign jurisdictions. To the extent applicable, the Plan is intended to comply with the applicable requirements of Rule 16b-3, and with respect to Awards intended to be “performance-based,” the applicable provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code, and the Plan shall be limited, construed and interpreted in a manner so as to comply therewith.

(c) Subject to the terms of the Plan and applicable law and the rules of the Applicable Exchange and in addition to those authorities provided in Section 4(b), the Committee (or its delegate) shall have

full power and authority to: (i) designate Participants; (ii) determine the type or types of Awards (including Substitute Awards) to be granted to each Participant under the Plan; (iii) determine the number of Shares to be covered by (or with respect to which payments, rights, or other matters are to be calculated in connection with) Awards; (iv) determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of any Award granted hereunder, including, but not limited to, (A) the exercise or purchase price (if any), (B) any restriction or limitation, (C) any vesting schedule (which for Awards to employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries, except for Awards (1) relating to a number of Shares not to exceed the Unrestricted Pool, (2) Cash-Based Awards, (3) relating to Shares acquired for consideration and (4) Awards subject to vesting in whole or part based on performance criteria, shall provide for full vesting no earlier than 12 months after the applicable grant date, subject to any accelerated vesting and/or exercisability, as applicable, determined by the Committee in an Award Agreement, the Plan or any other applicable arrangement to apply upon the occurrence of a specified event) or (D) any forfeiture restrictions or waiver thereof, regarding any Award and the Shares relating thereto, based on such factors, if any, as the Committee shall determine, in its sole discretion; (v) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances Awards may be settled or exercised in cash, Shares, other securities, or other Awards, or canceled, forfeited or suspended, and the method or methods by which Awards may be settled, exercised, canceled, forfeited or suspended; (vi) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards, and other amounts payable with respect to an Award under the Plan shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the holder thereof or of the Committee, taking into consideration the requirements of Section 409A of the Code; (vii) determine whether to require a Participant, as a condition of the granting of any Award, to not sell or otherwise dispose of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Award for a period of time as determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, following the date of the acquisition of such Award; (viii) to determine whether an Option is an Incentive Stock Option or Non-Qualified Stock Option; (ix) to modify, extend or renew an Award;provided,however, that such action does not subject the Award to Section 409A of the Code without the consent of the Participant; (x) interpret and administer the Plan and any instrument or agreement relating to, or Award made under, the Plan; (xi) establish, amend, suspend or waive such rules and regulations and appoint such agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan; (xii) solely to the extent permitted by applicable law and the rules of the Applicable Exchange, to determine whether, to what extent and under what circumstances to provide loans (which may be on a recourse basis and shall bear interest at the rate the Committee shall provide) to Participants in order to exercise Options or acquire Shares under the Plan; (xiii) accelerate the vesting or exercisability of, or lapse of restrictions on, any Award at any time; (xiv) amend an outstanding Award or grant a replacement Award for an Award previously granted under the Plan if, in its sole discretion, the Committee determines that (A) the tax consequences of such Award to the Company or the Participant differ from those consequences that were expected to occur on the date the Award was granted or (B) clarifications or interpretations of, or changes to, tax law or regulations permit Awards to be granted that have more favorable tax consequences than initially anticipated; and (xv) make any other determination and take any other action that the Committee deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan.

(d) All decisions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding upon all parties, including the Company, the stockholders and the Participants.

SECTION 5. Shares Available for Awards; Per Person Limitations.

(a) Subject to adjustment as provided below, the maximum number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan is 18,000,000 Shares (“Plan Share Limit”). The maximum number of these reserved Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options may be granted under the Plan shall be 18,000,000 (“Plan ISO Limit”). Each Share with respect to which an Option or stock-settled SAR is granted under the Plan shall reduce the aggregate number of Shares that may be delivered under the Plan by one Share and each Share with respect to which any other Award denominated in Shares is granted under the Plan shall reduce the aggregate number of Shares that may be delivered under the Plan by one Share. With respect to Stock Appreciation Rights settled in Shares, each Share with respect to which such stock-settled SAR is exercised shall be counted as one Share against the

maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be delivered pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan as provided above, regardless of the number of Shares actually delivered upon settlement of such stock-settled SAR. If any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Unit or Other Stock-Based Award granted under the Plan expires, terminates or is canceled for any reason without having been exercised in full, the number of Shares subject to such Award that were not issued with respect to such Award shall again be available for the purpose of Awards under the Plan without reducing the number of Shares that remain available for issuance. If any shares of Restricted Stock, Performance Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards denominated in Shares awarded under the Plan to a Participant are forfeited for any reason, the number of forfeited shares of Restricted Stock, Performance Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards denominated in Shares shall again be available for purposes of Awards under the Plan. Any Award under the Plan settled in cash shall not be counted against the foregoing maximum share limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, no Shares that are surrendered, withheld or tendered to the Company in payment of the exercise price of an Option or any taxes required to be withheld in respect of any Award shall again become available to be delivered pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan.

(b) Any Shares delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Shares or Shares acquired by the Company.

(c) The following individual Participant limitations shall apply:

(i) The maximum number of Shares subject to (x) any Award of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or (y) any Award of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Other Stock-Based Awards for which the grant of such Award or the lapse of the relevant restriction period is subject to the attainment of Performance Goals in accordance with Section 10 which may be granted under the Plan during any fiscal year of the Company to any Participant shall be 2,000,000 Shares individually for any such type or in the aggregate (the “Annual Individual Plan Share Limit”). If a Stock Appreciation Right is granted in tandem with an Option, it shall apply against the Participant’s individual share limitations for both Stock Appreciation Rights and Options.

(ii) There are no annual individual share limitations applicable to Participants on Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Other Stock-Based Awards for which the grant, vesting or payment (as applicable) of any such Award is not subject to the attainment of Performance Goals.

(iii) In the case of Awards that are subject to the attainment of Performance Goals in accordance with Section 10 and that are settled in cash based on the Fair Market Value of a Share, the maximum aggregate amount of cash that may be paid pursuant to Awards granted in any fiscal year of the Company under the Plan shall be equal to the per-Share Fair Market Value as of the relevant vesting, payment or settlement date multiplied by the Annual Individual Plan Share Limit.

(iv) The maximum value of a cash payment made under a Performance Award (other than an award based on the Fair Market Value of a Share) which may be granted under the Plan with respect to any fiscal year of the Company to any Participant shall be $10,000,000.

(d) Changes

(i) The existence of the Plan and the Awards granted hereunder shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Board or the stockholders of the Company to make or authorize (A) any adjustment, recapitalization, reorganization or other change in the Company’s capital structure or its business, (B) any merger or consolidation of the Company or any Affiliate, (C) any issuance of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference stock ahead of or affecting the Shares, (D) the dissolution or liquidation of the Company or any Affiliate, (E) any sale or transfer of all or part of the assets or business of the Company or any Affiliate or (F) any other corporate act or proceeding.

(ii) Subject to the provisions of Section 5(d)(iv), if there shall occur any such change in the capital structure of the Company by reason of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock

dividend, extraordinary dividend, subdivision, combination or reclassification of shares that may be issued under the Plan, any recapitalization, any merger, any consolidation, any spin off, any reorganization or any partial or complete liquidation, or any other corporate transaction or event having an effect similar to any of the foregoing (a “Corporate Event”), then the Committee shall appropriately adjust (A) the number and/or kind of shares that thereafter may be issued under the Plan, (B) the number and/or kind of shares or other property (including cash) to be issued upon exercise of an outstanding Award granted under the Plan, and/or (C) the purchase price thereof. In addition, subject to Section 5(d)(iv), if there shall occur any change in the capital structure or the business of the Company that is not a Corporate Event (an “Other Extraordinary Event”), including by reason of any ordinary dividend (whether cash or stock), any conversion, any adjustment, any issuance of any class of securities convertible or exercisable into, or exercisable for, any class of stock, or any sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets or business, then the Committee, in its sole discretion, may adjust any Award and make such other adjustments to the Plan. Any adjustment pursuant to this Section 5(d) shall be consistent with the applicable Corporate Event or the applicable Other Extraordinary Event, as the case may be, and in such manner as the Committee may, in its sole discretion, deem appropriate and equitable to prevent substantial dilution or enlargement of the rights granted to, or available for, Participants under the Plan. Any such adjustment determined by the Committee shall be final, binding and conclusive on the Company and all Participants and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and permitted assigns. Except as expressly provided in this Section 5(d) or in the applicable Award Agreement, a Participant shall have no rights by reason of any Corporate Event or any Other Extraordinary Event.

(iii) Fractional shares of Shares resulting from any adjustment in Awards pursuant to Section 5(d)(i) or Section 5(d)(ii) shall be aggregated until, and eliminated at, the time of exercise by rounding-down for fractions less than one-half and rounding-up for fractions equal to or greater than one-half. No cash settlements shall be made with respect to fractional shares eliminated by rounding. Notice of any adjustment shall be given by the Committee to each Participant whose Award has been adjusted and such adjustment (whether or not such notice is given) shall be effective and binding for all purposes of the Plan.

(iv) In the event of a merger or consolidation of the Company or in the event of any transaction that results in the acquisition of substantially all of the Company’s outstanding Shares by a single person or entity or by a group of persons and/or entities acting in concert, or in the event of the sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets (all of the foregoing being referred to as an “Acquisition Event”), then the Committee may, in its sole discretion, terminate all outstanding and unexercised Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, or any Other Stock-Based Award that provides for a Participant elected exercise, effective as of the date of the Acquisition Event, by (A) cashing-out such Awards upon the date of consummation of the Acquisition Event by providing for a cash payment to the holder of such Awards, including in the case of an outstanding Option or SAR, a cash payment to the holder of such Option or SAR in consideration for the cancelation of such Option or SAR in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value (as of a date specified by the Committee) of the Shares subject to such Option or SAR over the aggregate exercise price of such Option or SAR, (B) cancelling or terminating any Option or SAR having a per-Share exercise price equal to, or in excess of, the Fair Market Value of a share subject to such Option or SAR without any payment or consideration therefor or (C) providing for a substitution or assumption of Awards, accelerating the exercisability of, lapse of restrictions on, or termination of, Awards, or delivering notice of termination to each Participant at least 5 days prior to the date of consummation of the Acquisition Event, in which case during the period from the date on which such notice of termination is delivered to the consummation of the Acquisition Event, each such Participant shall have the right to exercise in full all of such Participant’s Awards that are then outstanding (without regard to any limitations on exercisability otherwise contained in the Award Agreements), but any such exercise shall be contingent on the occurrence of the Acquisition Event, and, provided that, if the Acquisition Event does not take place within a specified period after giving such notice for any reason

whatsoever, the notice and exercise pursuant thereto shall be null and void. If an Acquisition Event occurs but the Committee does not terminate the outstanding Awards pursuant to this Section 5(d)(iv), then the provisions of Section 5(d)(ii) and Section 14 shall apply.

(e) Shares underlying Substitute Awards and Shares underlying awards that can only be settled in cash shall not reduce the number of Shares remaining available for issuance under the Plan.

(f) Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, if authorized but previously unissued Shares are issued under the Plan, such shares shall not be issued for a consideration that is less than as permitted under applicable law and the rules of the Applicable Exchange.

(g) The aggregate fair market value of Awards that may be granted under the Plan to non-employee members of the Board for service in such capacity in any fiscal year shall not exceed $750,000 (which, in the case of Options, shall be determined based on the grant date fair value of such stock options and, in the case of other stock-based awards, shall be determined based on the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares on the grant date), subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5(d).

SECTION 6. Options. The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Options to Participants with the following terms and conditions and with such additional terms and conditions, in either case not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee shall determine:

(a) The purchase price per Share under an Option shall be determined by the Committee;provided,however, that, except in the case of Substitute Awards, such purchase price shall not be less than the 100% (or 110% in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a person owning stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company, its subsidiaries or its parent, determined in accordance with Section 422 of the Code) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant of such Option.

(b) The term of each Option shall be fixed by the Committee but shall not exceed 10 years from the date of grant thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the term of an Option (other than an Incentive Stock Option) held by any Participant not subject to Section 409A of the Code would otherwise expire during, or within ten business days of the expiration of a Blackout Period applicable to such Participant, then the term of such Option shall be extended to the close of business on the tenth business day following the expiration of the Blackout Period.

(c) The Committee shall determine the time or times at which an Option may be exercised in whole or in part.

(d) To the extent vested and exercisable, Options may be exercised in whole or in part at any time during the Option term, by giving written notice of exercise to the Company specifying the number of Shares to be purchased. The partial exercise of an Option shall not cause the expiration, termination or cancelation of the remaining portion thereof. Such notice shall be accompanied by payment in full of the purchase price as follows: (i) in cash or by check, bank draft or money order payable to the order of the Company; (ii) solely to the extent permitted by applicable law, if the Shares are traded on a national securities exchange, and the Committee authorizes, through a procedure whereby the Participant delivers irrevocable instructions to a broker reasonably acceptable to the Committee to deliver promptly to the Company an amount equal to the purchase price; or (iii) on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Committee (including, without limitation, having the Company withhold Shares issuable upon exercise of the Option, or by payment in full or in part in the form of Shares owned by the Participant, based on the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the payment date as determined by the Committee). No Shares shall be issued until payment therefor, as provided herein, has been made or provided for.

(e) The terms of any Incentive Stock Option granted under the Plan shall comply in all respects with the provisions of Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision thereto, and any regulations

promulgated thereunder. To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the time of grant) of the Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a Participant during any calendar year under the Plan and/or any other stock option plan of the Company, any subsidiary or any parent exceeds $100,000, such Options shall be treated as Non-Qualified Stock Options. Should any provision of the Plan not be necessary in order for the Options to qualify as Incentive Stock Options, or should any additional provisions be required, the Committee may amend the Plan accordingly, without the necessity of obtaining the approval of the stockholders of the Company, subject to the rules of the Applicable Exchange. To the extent that any such Option does not qualify as an Incentive Stock Option (whether because of its provisions or the time or manner of its exercise or otherwise), such Option or the portion thereof which does not so qualify shall constitute a separate Non-Qualified Stock Option.

SECTION 7. Stock Appreciation Rights.

(a) The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) to Participants with terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.

(b) SARs may be granted hereunder to Participants either alone (“freestanding”) or in addition to other Awards granted under the Plan (“tandem”) and may, but need not, relate to specific Options granted under Section 6.

(c) Any tandem SAR related to an Option may be granted at the same time such Option is granted to the Participant. In the case of any tandem SAR related to any Option, the SAR or applicable portion thereof shall not be exercisable until the related Option or applicable portion thereof is exercisable and shall terminate and no longer be exercisable upon the termination or exercise of the related Option, except that a SAR granted with respect to less than the full number of Shares covered by a related Option shall not be reduced until the exercise or termination of the related Option exceeds the number of Shares not covered by the SAR. Any Option related to any tandem SAR shall no longer be exercisable to the extent the related SAR has been exercised.

(d) A freestanding SAR shall not have a term of greater than 10 years or, unless it is a Substitute Award, an exercise price less than 100% of Fair Market Value of the Share on the date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the term of a SAR held by any Participant not subject to Section 409A of the Code would otherwise expire during, or within ten business days of the expiration of a Blackout Period applicable to such Participant, then the term of such SAR shall be extended to the close of business on the tenth business day following the expiration of the Blackout Period.

SECTION 8. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.

(a) The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Awards of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units to Participants.

(b) Shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to such restrictions as the Committee may impose (including, without limitation, any limitation on the right to vote a Share of Restricted Stock or the right to receive any dividend or Dividend Equivalent or other right), which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such time or times, in such installments or otherwise, as the Committee may deem appropriate.

(c) Any share of Restricted Stock granted under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Committee may deem appropriate including, without limitation, book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates. In the event any stock certificate is issued in respect of shares of Restricted Stock granted under the Plan, such certificate shall be registered in the name of the Participant and shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock. If stock certificates are issued in respect of shares of Restricted Stock, the Committee may require that any stock certificates evidencing such Shares be held in custody by the Company until the restrictions thereon shall have lapsed, and that, as a condition of any grant of Restricted Stock, the Participant shall have delivered a duly signed stock power or other

instruments of assignment (including a power of attorney), each endorsed in blank with a guarantee of signature if deemed necessary or appropriate by the Company, which would permit transfer to the Company of all or a portion of the shares subject to the Restricted Stock Award in the event that such Award is forfeited in whole or part.

(d) The Committee, in its discretion, may award Dividend Equivalents with respect to Awards of Restricted Stock Units. The entitlements on such Dividend Equivalents will not be available until the vesting of the Award of Restricted Stock Units.

(e) If the Committee intends that an Award under this Section 8 shall constitute or give rise to “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, such Award may be structured in accordance with the requirements of Section 10, including without limitation, the Performance Goals and the Award limitation set forth therein, and any such Award shall be considered a Performance Award for purposes of the Plan.

SECTION 9. Deferred Stock. The Committee is authorized to grant Deferred Stock to Participants, subject to the following terms and conditions:

(a) Deferred Stock shall be settled upon expiration of the deferral period specified for an Award of Deferred Stock by the Committee (or, if permitted by the Committee, as elected by the Participant). In addition, Deferred Stock shall be subject to such restrictions on transferability, risk of forfeiture and other restrictions, if any, as the Committee may impose, which restrictions may lapse at the expiration of the deferral period or at earlier specified times (including based on achievement of performance goals and/or future service requirements), separately or in combination, in installments or otherwise, and under such other circumstances as the Committee may determine at the date of grant or thereafter. Deferred Stock may be satisfied by delivery of Shares, other Awards, or a combination thereof, as determined by the Committee at the date of grant or thereafter.

(b) The Committee, in its discretion, may award Dividend Equivalents with respect to Awards of Deferred Stock. The entitlements on such Dividend Equivalents will not be available until the expiration of the deferral period for the Award of Deferred Stock.

SECTION 10. Performance Awards.

(a) The Committee may grant a Performance Award to a Participant payable upon the attainment of specific Performance Goals. The Committee shall, in its sole discretion, designate within the first 90 days of a Performance Period (or, if shorter, within the maximum period allowed under Section 162(m) of the Code) which Participants shall be eligible to receive Performance Awards in respect of such Performance Period. The Committee may grant Performance Awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, as well as Performance Awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. If the Performance Award is a Restricted Stock Unit or is payable in shares of Restricted Stock, such shares shall be transferable to the Participant or such Restricted Stock Unit shall vest only upon attainment of the relevant Performance Goal in accordance with Section 8. If the Performance Award is payable in cash, it may be paid upon the attainment of the relevant Performance Goals either in cash or in shares of Restricted Stock (based on the then current Fair Market Value of such shares), as determined by the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion. Each Performance Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement in such form that is not inconsistent with the Plan and that the Committee may from time to time approve. With respect to Performance Awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee shall condition the right to payment of any Performance Award upon the attainment of objective Performance Goals established pursuant to Section 10(b)(iv).

(b)Terms and Conditions. Performance Awards awarded pursuant to this Section 10 shall be subject to the following terms and conditions:

(i)Earning of Performance Award. At the expiration of the applicable Performance Period, the Committee shall determine the extent to which the Performance Goals established pursuant

to Section 10(b) are achieved and the percentage of each Performance Award that has been earned. The Committee shall calculate and certify in writing that amount of the Performance Awards earned for the Performance Period based upon the Performance Formula applied against the relevant Performance Goal(s). The Committee shall then determine the actual amount of each Participant’s Performance Award for the Performance Period and, in so doing, may apply negative discretion as authorized by Section 10(b)(ii).

(ii)Negative Discretion. In determining the actual amount of an individual Performance Award for a Performance Period, the Committee may, in its sole and plenary discretion, reduce or eliminate the amount of the Award earned in the Performance Period, even if applicable Performance Goals have been attained and without regard to any employment agreement between the Company and a Participant.

(iii)Non-Transferability. Subject to the applicable provisions of the Award Agreement and the Plan, Performance Awards may not be Transferred during the Performance Period.

(iv)Objective Performance Goals, Formulae or Standards. With respect to Performance Awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee shall establish the objective Performance Goals for the earning of Performance Awards based on a Performance Period applicable to each Participant or class of Participants in writing prior to the beginning of the applicable Performance Period or at such later date as permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code and while the outcome of the Performance Goals are substantially uncertain. Such Performance Goals may incorporate, if and only to the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code, provisions for disregarding (or adjusting for) the impact of any of the following that the Committee determines to be appropriate: (A) corporate transactions (including, without limitation, dispositions and acquisitions) and other similar type events or circumstances, (B) restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items or events, and other unusual or non-recurring charges as described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 and/or management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing or incorporated by reference in the Company’s Form 10-K for the applicable year; (C) an event either not directly related to the operations of the Company or any of its Affiliates or not within the reasonable control of the Company’s management, (D) a change in tax law or accounting standards required by generally accepted accounting principles, or (E) such other exclusions or adjustments as the Committee specifies at the time the Award is granted. To the extent that any such provision would create impermissible discretion under Section 162(m) of the Code or otherwise violate Section 162(m) of the Code, such provision shall be of no force or effect, with respect to Performance Awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(c)Dividends/Dividend Equivalents. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee in an Award Agreement, amounts equal to dividends declared during the Performance Period with respect to the number of Shares covered by a Performance Award or any Dividend Equivalents will not be paid to the Participant. In all cases, such dividends or Dividend Equivalents would not become payable until the expiration of the applicable Performance Period. A Participant shall be eligible to receive dividends or Dividend Equivalents in respect of any Performance Award that is payable upon the achievement of Performance Goals only to the extent that the Performance Goals for the relevant Performance Period are achieved.

(d)Payment. Following the Committee’s determination in accordance with Section 10(b)(i), the Company shall settle Performance Awards, in such form (including, without limitation, in Shares or in cash) as determined by the Committee, in an amount equal to such Participant’s earned Performance Awards. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, award an amount less than the earned Performance Awards and/or subject the payment of all or part of any Performance Award to additional vesting, forfeiture and deferral conditions as it deems appropriate.

(e)Termination. Subject to the applicable provisions of the Award Agreement and the Plan, upon a Participant’s termination of Service for any reason during the Performance Period for a given

Performance Award, the Performance Award in question will vest or be forfeited in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Committee at grant.

SECTION 11. Investment Rights.

(a) The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Awards of Investment Rights to Participants subject to the terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.

(b) An Award of Investment Rights entitles a Participant to purchase for cash a stated number of Shares, at a stated purchase price that is not less than the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant of the Award, subject to the conditions referenced in Section 11(c). A Participant shall be entitled to exercise the right to purchase such Shares during the period specified in the Investment Rights Notice.

(c) A Participant’s right to exercise Investment Rights covered by an Award granted to such Participant is subject to satisfaction of any and all of the conditions in the Investment Rights Notice (and any such other conditions as may be specified by the Committee).

SECTION 12. Other Stock-Based and Cash-Based Awards.

(a) The Committee is authorized, subject to limitations under applicable law and the rules of the Applicable Exchange, to grant to Participants such other Awards that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, Shares or factors that may influence the value of Shares, including, without limitation, convertible or exchangeable debt securities, other rights convertible or exchangeable into Shares, purchase rights for Shares, Awards with value and payment contingent upon performance of the Company or business units thereof, Shares awarded purely as a bonus or in lieu of cash compensation and not subject to restrictions or conditions, equity interests in any entity with respect to which the Company holds, directly or indirectly, a controlling interest, whether such entity is a corporation, partnership or other entity, or any other factors designated by the Committee. The Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of such Awards. Shares delivered pursuant to an Award in the nature of a purchase right granted under this Section 12 shall be purchased for such consideration, paid for at such times, by such methods, and in such forms, including, without limitation, cash, Shares, other Awards, notes, or other property, as the Committee shall determine. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee in an Award Agreement, the recipient of an Award under this Section 12 shall not be entitled to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, dividends or Dividend Equivalents in respect of the number of Shares covered by the Award. In all cases, such dividends or Dividend Equivalents would not become payable until the expiration of any applicable performance period. An Other Stock-Based Award that is in the form of a grant of an equity interest in any entity with respect to which the Company holds, directly or indirectly, a controlling interest, may be granted in exchange for, replacement of, or substitution for an Award previously granted under the Plan (or any predecessor plan) or Substitute Award;provided that, if such Award or Substitute Award is a stock option or a stock appreciation right, then the Other Stock-Based Award granted in exchange, replacement, or substitution thereof, may not have the economic effect of reducing the exercise price or term of such Award or Substitute Award.

(b) The Committee may from time to time grant Cash-Based Awards to Participants in such amounts, on such terms and conditions, and for such consideration, including no consideration or such minimum consideration as may be required by applicable law, as it shall determine in its sole discretion. Cash-Based Awards may be granted subject to the satisfaction of vesting conditions or may be awarded purely as a bonus and not subject to restrictions or conditions, and if subject to vesting conditions, the Committee may accelerate the vesting of such Awards at any time in its sole discretion. The grant of a Cash-Based Award shall not require a segregation of any of the Company’s assets for satisfaction of the Company’s payment obligation thereunder.

(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, when an Award with an exercise price is granted under the Plan and the exercise of the Award by the Participant may result in the issuance of Shares

to the Participant, the exercise price (taking into account any conversion, exchange or other substitutions) of the Award may not be less than the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant of the Award.

SECTION 13. Effect of Termination of Service on Awards. The Committee may provide, by rule or regulation or in any Award Agreement, or may determine in any individual case, the circumstances in which Awards shall be exercised, vested, paid or forfeited in the event a Participant ceases to provide Service to the Company or any Subsidiary prior to the end of a performance period or exercise or settlement of such Award.

SECTION 14. Change in Control Provisions. In the event of a Change in Control, and except as otherwise provided by the Committee in an Award Agreement, a Participant’s unvested Award shall be treated in accordance with one of the following methods as determined by the Committee:

(a) Awards, whether or not then vested, shall be continued, assumed, have new rights substituted therefor or be treated in accordance with Section 5(d) hereof, as determined by the Committee, and restrictions to which shares of Restricted Stock or any other Award granted prior to the Change in Control are subject shall not lapse upon a Change in Control and the Restricted Stock or other Award shall, where appropriate in the sole discretion of the Committee, receive the same distribution as other Shares on such terms as determined by the Committee;provided that the Committee may decide to award additional Restricted Stock or other Awards in lieu of any cash distribution. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, for purposes of Incentive Stock Options, any assumed or substituted Option shall comply with the requirements of Treasury Regulation Section 1.424-1 (and any amendment thereto).

(b) The Committee, in its sole discretion, may provide for the purchase of any Awards by the Company or an Affiliate for an amount of cash (either on a current basis or, to the extent such right does not subject the Award to the excise tax under Section 409A of the Code, a deferred basis) equal to the excess of the Change in Control Price (as defined below) of the Shares covered by such Awards, over the aggregate exercise price of such Awards. For purposes of this Section 14, “Change in Control Price” shall mean the highest price per Share paid in any transaction related to a Change in Control of the Company.

(c) If and to the extent that the approach chosen by the Committee results in an acceleration or potential acceleration of the exercisability, vesting or settlement of any Award, the Committee may impose such conditions upon the exercise, vesting and/or settlement of the Award (including without limitation a requirement that some or all of the proceeds from the accelerated portion of the Award be held in escrow and/or remain subject to risks of forfeiture or other conditions) as it shall determine;provided that those risks of forfeiture or other conditions are not in the good faith judgment of the Committee more restrictive than those under the original terms of the Award Agreement and do not result in any violation of Section 409A of the Code. The Committee shall give written notice of any proposed transaction referred to in this Section 14 at a reasonable period of time prior to the closing date for such transaction (which notice may be given either before or after the approval of such transaction), in order that Participants may have a reasonable period of time prior to the closing date of such transaction within which to exercise any Awards that are then exercisable (including any Awards that may become exercisable upon the closing date of such transaction). A Participant may condition his or her exercise of any Awards upon the consummation of the transaction.

SECTION 15. General Provisions Applicable to Awards.

(a) Awards may be granted for no cash consideration or for such minimal cash consideration as may be required by applicable law.

(b) Awards may, in the discretion of the Committee, be granted either alone or in addition to or in tandem with any other Award or any award granted under any other plan of the Company. Awards

granted in addition to or in tandem with other Awards, or in addition to or in tandem with awards granted under any other plan of the Company, may be granted either at the same time as or at a different time from the grant of such other Awards or awards.

(c) Subject to the terms of the Plan, payments or transfers to be made by the Company upon the grant, exercise or payment of an Award may be made in the form of cash, Shares, other securities or other Awards, or any combination thereof, as determined by the Committee in its discretion at the time of grant, and may be made in a single payment or transfer, in installments, or on a deferred basis, in each case in accordance with rules and procedures established by the Committee and in compliance with Section 409A of the Code. Such rules and procedures may include, without limitation, provisions for the payment or crediting of reasonable interest (or no interest) on installment or deferred payments or the grant or crediting of Dividend Equivalents in respect of installment or deferred payments.

(d) Except as may be permitted by the Committee or as specifically provided in an Award Agreement, (i) no Award or other benefit payable under the Plan shall, except as otherwise specifically provided by law or permitted by the Committee, be Transferable in any manner other than by will or the law of descent, and any attempt to Transfer any such benefit shall be void, and any such benefit shall not in any manner be liable for or subject to the debts, contracts, liabilities, engagements or torts of any person who shall be entitled to such benefit, nor shall it be subject to attachment or legal process for or against such person, and (ii) each Award, and each right under any Award, shall be exercisable during the Participant’s lifetime only by the Participant or, if permissible under applicable law, by the Participant’s guardian or legal representative. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to any Award which has been fully exercised, earned or paid, as the case may be, and shall not preclude forfeiture of an Award in accordance with the terms thereof.

(e) A Participant may designate a beneficiary or change a previous beneficiary designation at such times prescribed by the Committee by using forms and following procedures approved or accepted by the Committee for that purpose. If no beneficiary designated by the Participant is eligible to receive payments or other benefits or exercise rights that are available under the Plan at the Participant’s death, the beneficiary shall be the Participant’s estate.

(f) All certificates for Shares and/or Shares or other securities delivered under the Plan pursuant to any Award or the exercise thereof shall be subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the Plan or the rules, regulations, and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any stock exchange upon which such Shares or other securities are then listed, and any applicable Federal or state securities laws, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no Award granted hereunder shall be construed as an offer to sell securities of the Company, and no such offer shall be outstanding, unless and until the Committee in its sole and plenary discretion has determined that any such offer, if made, would be in compliance with all applicable requirements of the U.S. Federal and any other applicable securities laws.

(g) The Committee may impose restrictions on any Award with respect to non-competition, confidentiality and other restrictive covenants, as it deems necessary in its sole discretion and/or for the clawing back of any rights or benefits under any Awards as a result of any breaches of any of the foregoing covenants and/or for any reasons specified in the Award Agreement or in any employment or other agreement between the Company or any Subsidiary and the Participant. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, an Award Agreement may provide that an Award granted thereunder shall be canceled if the Participant, without the consent of the Company, while employed by or providing services to the Company or any Subsidiary or after termination of such employment or service, (i) violates a non-competition, non-solicitation or non-disclosure covenant or agreement, (ii) otherwise engages in activity that is in conflict with or adverse to the interest of the Company or any Subsidiary, including fraud or conduct contributing to any financial restatements or irregularities, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion or (iii) to the extent applicable to the

Participant, otherwise violates any policy adopted by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries relating to the recovery of compensation granted, paid, delivered, awarded or otherwise provided to any Participant by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries as such policy is in effect on the date of grant of the applicable Award or, to the extent necessary to address the requirements of applicable law (including Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, as codified in Section 10D of the Act, Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or any other applicable law), as may be amended from time to time. The Committee may also provide in an Award Agreement that (A) a Participant will forfeit any gain realized on the vesting or exercise of such Award if the Participant engages in any activity referred to in the preceding sentence, or (B) a Participant must repay the gain to the Company realized under a previously paid Performance Award or any other Award that vested or was earned with respect to performance objectives if a financial restatement reduces the amount that would have been earned under such Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the non-disclosure restrictions in this Section 15(g) or in any Award Agreement shall, or shall be interpreted to, impair the Participant from exercising any legally protected whistleblower rights (including under Rule 21F under the Act).

SECTION 16. Amendments and Termination.

(a) The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate the Plan and any outstanding Awards granted hereunder, in whole or in part, at any time without notice to or approval by the stockholders of the Company, for any purpose whatsoever;provided that all material amendments to the Plan shall require the prior approval of the stockholders of the Company and must comply with the rules of the Applicable Exchange. Examples of the types of amendments that are not material that the Board is entitled to make without stockholder approval include, without limitation, the following:

(i) ensuring continuing compliance with applicable law, the rules of the Applicable Exchange or other applicable stock exchange rules and regulations or accounting or tax rules and regulations;

(ii) amendments of a “housekeeping” nature, which include amendments to correct any defect, supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award Agreement in the manner and to the extent it shall deem desirable to carry the Plan into effect;

(iii) changing the vesting provision of the Plan or any Award (subject to the limitations for Awards subject to Section 10(b));

(iv) waiving any conditions or rights under any Award (subject to the limitations for Awards subject to Section 10(b));

(v) changing the termination provisions of any Award that does not entail an extension beyond the original expiration date thereof;

(vi) adding a cashless exercise feature payable in securities, where such feature provides for a full deduction of the number of underlying securities from the Plan reserve, and any amendment to a cashless exercise provision;

(vii) adding a form of financial assistance and any amendment to a financial assistance provision which is adopted;

(viii) changing the process by which a Participant who wishes to exercise his or her Award can do so, including the required form of payment for the Shares being purchased, the form of written notice of exercise provided to the Company and the place where such payments and notices must be delivered; and

(ix) delegating any or all of the powers of the Committee to administer the Plan to officers of the Company.

(b) Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, no amendment to the Plan requiring the approval of the stockholders of the Company under any applicable securities laws or requirements or the rules of the Applicable Exchange shall become effective until such approval is obtained. In addition to the foregoing, the approval of the holders of a majority of the Shares present and voting in person or by proxy at a meeting of stockholders shall be required for:

(i) an increase in the Plan Share Limit or the Plan ISO Limit;

(ii) any adjustment (other than in connection with a stock dividend, recapitalization or other transaction where an adjustment is permitted or required under Section 5(d)(i) or Section 5(d)(ii)) or amendment that reduces or would have the effect of reducing the exercise price of an Option or SAR previously granted under the Plan or that would be treated, for accounting purposes, as a “repricing” of such Option or SAR, whether through amendment, cancellation or replacement grants, or other means (provided that, in such a case, insiders of the Company who benefit from such amendment are not eligible to vote their Shares in respect of the approval);

(iii) an increase in the limits on Awards that may be granted to any Participant under Section 5;

(iv) an extension of the term of an outstanding Option or Stock Appreciation Right beyond the expiration date thereof;

(v) permitting Options granted under the Plan to be Transferrable other than for normal estate settlement purposes;

(vi) any amendment to the plan amendment provisions set forth in this Section 16 which is not an amendment within the nature of Section 16(a)(i) or Section 16(a)(ii), unless the change results from application of Section 5(d)(i) or Section 5(d)(ii); and

(vii) change the class of employees or other individuals eligible to participate in the Plan.

Furthermore, except as otherwise permitted under the Plan, no change to an outstanding Award that will adversely impair the rights of a Participant may be made without the consent of the Participant except to the extent that such change is required to comply with applicable law, the rules and regulations of the Applicable Exchange or accounting or tax rules and regulations.

SECTION 17. Miscellaneous.

(a) The Plan is intended to constitute an “unfunded” plan for incentive and deferred compensation. With respect to any payment as to which a Participant has a fixed and vested interest but which are not yet made to a Participant by the Company, nothing contained herein shall give any such Participant any right that is greater than those of a general unsecured creditor of the Company.

(b) No employee, Participant or other person shall have any claim to be granted any Award under the Plan, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment of employees, Participants, or holders or beneficiaries of Awards under the Plan. The terms and conditions of Awards need not be the same with respect to each recipient. Any Award granted under the Plan shall be a one-time Award which does not constitute a promise of future grants. The Company, in its sole discretion, maintains the right to make available future grants hereunder.

(c) The Company shall have the right to deduct from any payment to be made pursuant to the Plan, or to otherwise require, prior to the issuance or delivery of Shares or the payment of any cash hereunder, payment by the Participant of, any Federal, state or local taxes required by law to be withheld. Upon the vesting of Restricted Stock (or other Award that is taxable upon vesting), or upon making an election under Section 83(b) of the Code, a Participant shall pay all required withholding to the Company. Any required withholding obligation with regard to any Participant may be satisfied, subject to the consent of the Committee, by reducing the number of Shares otherwise deliverable or by delivering Shares already owned. Any fraction of a Share required to satisfy such tax obligations shall be disregarded and the amount due shall be paid instead in cash by the Participant.

(d) Without limiting the generality of Section 17(c), subject to the Committee’s discretion, a Participant may satisfy, in whole or in part, the foregoing withholding liability by delivery of Shares owned by the Participant (which are not subject to any pledge or other security interest) having a Fair Market Value equal to such withholding liability or by having the Company withhold from the number of Shares otherwise issuable pursuant to the exercise of the Option or SAR, or the lapse of the restrictions on any other Award (in the case of SARs and other Awards, if such SARs and other Awards are settled in Shares), a number of Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to such withholding liability.

(e) If any Participant shall make any disposition of Shares delivered pursuant to the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option under the circumstances described in Section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions) or any successor provision of the Code, such Participant shall notify the Company of such disposition within ten days of such disposition.

(f) Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Company from adopting or continuing in effect other or additional compensation arrangements, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.

(g) The grant of an Award shall not be construed as giving a Participant the right to be retained in the employ of, or to continue to provide services to, the Company or any Subsidiary. Further, the Company or the applicable Subsidiary may at any time dismiss a Participant, free from any liability, or any claim under the Plan, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in any Award Agreement or in any other agreement binding the parties. The receipt of any Award under the Plan is not intended to confer any rights on the receiving Participant except as set forth in such Award.

(h) If any provision of the Plan or any Award is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, or as to any person or Award, or would disqualify the Plan or any Award under any law deemed applicable by the Committee, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to conform to applicable laws, or if it cannot be so construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Committee, materially altering the intent of the Plan or the Award, such provision shall be stricken as to such jurisdiction, person or Award, and the remainder of the Plan and any such Award shall remain in full force and effect.

(i) Neither the Plan nor any Award shall create or be construed to create a trust or separate fund of any kind or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and a Participant or any other person. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company pursuant to an Award, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company.

(j) No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award, and the Committee shall determine whether cash or other securities shall be paid or transferred in lieu of any fractional Shares, or whether such fractional Shares or any rights thereto shall be canceled, terminated or otherwise eliminated.

(k) No Award or other benefit payable under the Plan shall, except as otherwise specifically provided by law or permitted by the Committee, be Transferable in any manner, and any attempt to Transfer any such benefit shall be void, and any such benefit shall not in any manner be liable for or subject to the debts, contracts, liabilities, engagements or torts of any person who shall be entitled to such benefit, nor shall it be subject to attachment or legal process for or against such person.

(l) Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, as long as the Shares are listed on a national securities exchange including the Applicable Exchange or system sponsored by a national securities association, the issuance of Shares pursuant to an Award shall be conditioned upon such shares being listed on such exchange or system. The Company shall have no obligation to issue such Shares unless and until such Shares are so listed, and the right to exercise any Option or other Award with respect to such Shares shall be suspended until such listing has been effected. If at any time counsel to the

Company shall be of the opinion that any sale or delivery of Shares pursuant to an Option or other Award is or may in the circumstances be unlawful or result in the imposition of excise taxes on the Company under the statutes, rules or regulations of any applicable jurisdiction, the Company shall have no obligation to make such sale or delivery, or to make any application or to effect or to maintain any qualification or registration under the Securities Act or otherwise, with respect to Shares or Awards, and the right to exercise any Option or other Award shall be suspended until, in the opinion of said counsel, such sale or delivery shall be lawful or will not result in the imposition of excise taxes on the Company. A Participant shall be required to supply the Company with certificates, representations and information that the Company requests and otherwise cooperate with the Company in obtaining any listing, registration, qualification, exemption, consent or approval the Company deems necessary or appropriate.

(m) No Award granted or paid out under the Plan shall be deemed compensation for purposes of computing benefits under any retirement plan of the Company or its Affiliates nor affect any benefit under any other benefit plan now or subsequently in effect under which the availability or amount of benefits is related to the level of compensation. The provisions of Awards need not be the same with respect to each Participant, and such Awards to individual Participants need not be the same in subsequent years.

(n) All elections and transactions under the Plan by persons subject to Section 16 of the Act involving Shares are intended to comply with any applicable exemptive condition under Rule 16b-3. The Committee may establish and adopt written administrative guidelines, designed to facilitate compliance with Section 16(b) of the Act, as it may deem necessary or proper for the administration and operation of the Plan and the transaction of business thereunder.

(o) The Plan and each Award Agreement shall be binding on all successors and permitted assigns of a Participant, including, without limitation, the estate of such Participant and the executor, administrator or trustee of such estate. Any benefit payable to or for the benefit of a minor, an incompetent person or other person incapable of receipt thereof shall be deemed paid when paid to such person’s guardian or to the party providing or reasonably appearing to provide for the care of such person, and such payment shall fully discharge the Committee, the Board, the Company, its Affiliates and their employees, agents and representatives with respect thereto.

SECTION 18. Effective Date of the Plan. The Plan shall be effective as of the Effective Date, which is the date of adoption by the Board, subject to the approval of the Plan by the stockholders of the Company.

SECTION 19. Term of the Plan. No Award shall be granted under the Plan after ten years from the Effective Date. However, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in an applicable Award Agreement, any Award theretofore granted may extend beyond such date, and the authority of the Committee to amend, alter, adjust, suspend, discontinue, or terminate any such Award, or to waive any conditions or rights under any such Award, and the authority of the Board to amend the Plan, shall extend beyond such date.

SECTION 20. Section 409A of the Code.

(a) The Plan is intended to comply with the applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Code and shall be limited, construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent. To the extent that any Award is subject to Section 409A of the Code, it shall be paid in a manner that will comply with Section 409A of the Code, including proposed, temporary or final regulations or any other guidance issued by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service with respect thereto. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any provision in the Plan that is inconsistent with Section 409A of the Code shall be deemed to be amended to comply with Section 409A of the Code and to the extent such provision cannot be amended to comply therewith, such provision shall be null and void. The Company shall have no liability to a Participant, or any other party, if an Award that is intended to be exempt from, or compliant with, Section 409A of the Code is not so exempt or compliant or for any action taken by the Committee or the Company and, in the event that any

amount or benefit under the Plan becomes subject to penalties under Section 409A of the Code, responsibility for payment of such penalties shall rest solely with the affected Participants and not with the Company. Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Plan or Award Agreement, any payment(s) of “nonqualified deferred compensation” (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) that are otherwise required to be made under the Plan to a “specified employee” (as defined under Section 409A of the Code) as a result of such employee’s separation from service (other than a payment that is not subject to Section 409A of the Code) shall be delayed for the first six (6) months following such separation from service (or, if earlier, the date of death of the specified employee) and shall instead be paid (in a manner set forth in the Award Agreement) upon expiration of such delay period.

(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company does not make any representation to any Participant or beneficiary as to the tax consequences of any Awards made pursuant to this Plan, and the Company shall have no liability or other obligation to indemnify or hold harmless the Participant or any beneficiary for any tax, additional tax, interest or penalties that the Participant or any beneficiary may incur as a result of the grant, vesting, exercise or settlement of an Award under this Plan.

SECTION 21. Governing Law. This Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the conflict of laws provisions thereof.

Exhibit A

Performance Goals

Performance goals established for purposes of Awards intended to be “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, shall be based on the attainment of certain target levels of, or a specified increase or decrease (as applicable) in one or more of the following performance goals, which may include performance relative to the Company’s peers or those of the Company’s Affiliates or to the industry or industries in which the Company and/or its Affiliates operates:

earnings per share;

net earnings;

operating income;

gross income;

net income (before or after taxes);

cash flow (including free cash flow, operating cash flow and cash flow return on investment);

gross profit;

profit before taxes;

operating profit;

gross profit return on investment;

gross margin return on investment;

gross margin;

operating margin;

working capital;

earnings before interest and taxes;

earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA);

adjusted EBITDA;

net income before depreciation and amortization, interest expense, net, loss on early extinguishment of debt, and income tax expense, and excluding the impact of share-based compensation, other operating income (expense), net, and any other identified costs associated with nonrecurring projects.

earnings ratios;

return on equity;

return on assets or net assets;

return on capital;

return on invested capital;

net revenues;

gross revenues;

revenue growth or product revenue growth;

annual recurring revenues;

recurring revenues;

license revenues;

sales, net sales, or market share (in the aggregate or by segment);

reduction in costs;

total shareholder return;

economic value added;

customers or customer growth;

inventory turnover;

receivable turnover;

financial return ratios;

customer satisfaction surveys;

productivity;

specified objectives with regard to limiting the level of increase in all or a portion of the Company’s bank debt or that of any of its Affiliates or other long-term or short-term public or private debt or other similar financial obligations of the Company or any of its Affiliates, which may be calculated net of cash balances and/or other offsets and adjustments as may be established by the Committee in its sole discretion;

improvement in or attainment of expense levels or working capital levels;

the fair market value of a Share;

Share price (including, but not limited to, growth in Share price);

comparisons with various stock market indices;

product unit and pricing targets;

level or amount of acquisitions;

enterprise value;

book, economic book or intrinsic book value (including book value per share);

leverage ratio;

credit rating;

implementation or completion of critical projects;

the growth in the value of an investment in the Share assuming the reinvestment of dividends;

reduction in operating and/or other expenses;

days sales outstanding;

operational, safety and/or quality metrics measured by the Company or any of its Affiliates; or

Product innovation.

With respect to Awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, to the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, also exclude, or adjust to reflect, the impact of an event or occurrence, or of any item, reflected in Section 10(b)(iv) of the Plan that the Committee determines should be appropriately excluded or adjusted.

Performance goals may also be based upon individual participant performance goals, as determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. In addition, Awards that are not intended to

qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code may be based on the performance goals set forth herein or on such other performance goals as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

In addition, such performance goals may be based upon the attainment of specified levels of Company (or subsidiary, other Affiliate, division, other operational unit, administrative department or product category of the Company or any of its Affiliates) performance under one or more of the measures described above relative to the performance of other corporations. With respect to Awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, to the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code, but only to the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code (including, without limitation, compliance with any requirements for stockholder approval), the Committee may also designate additional business criteria on which the performance goals may be based or adjust, modify or amend the aforementioned business criteria.

LOGO


LOGO

THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY

ONE PPG PLACE

PITTSBURGH, PA 15222

    LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

STOCKHOLDER MEETING ADMISSION

In order to attend the meeting, you must obtain an admission ticket by going to the “Register for Meeting” link atwww.proxyvote.com.

TOVOTE,MARKBLOCKSBELOWINBLUEORBLACKINKASFOLLOWS:

M99328-P72407-Z67086KEEPTHISPORTIONFORYOURRECORDS

THISPROXYCARDISVALIDONLYWHENSIGNEDANDDATED.

DETACHANDRETURNTHISPORTIONONLY

THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the director nominees listed in Proposal 1.
1.    Election of Directors:ForAgainstAbstain

1a.  Gregory E. Abel

1b.  Alexandre Behring

1c.  Warren E. Buffett

1d.  John T. Cahill

1e.  Tracy Britt Cool

1f.  Jeanne P. Jackson

1g. Jorge Paulo Lemann

1h. Mackey J. McDonald

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

ForAgainstAbstain

1i.  John C. Pope

¨

¨

¨

1j.  Marcel Herrmann Telles

¨

¨

¨

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2.

2.

Advisory vote to approve executive compensation.

¨

¨

¨

The Board of Directors recommends a vote of 1 YEAR on Proposal 3.

1 Year

2 Years

3 Years

Abstain

3.

Advisory vote on the frequency of an executive compensation vote.

¨

¨

¨

¨

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 4 and 5.

For

Against

Abstain

For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions)

¨

4.

Approval of The Kraft Heinz Company 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

¨

¨

¨

5.

Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for 2016.

¨

¨

¨

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

    
jamesjsavinaa02.jpg
March 3, 2017   James J. Savina
    
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date
Senior Vice President, Global General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary


proxycard001.jpg





LOGO

THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Thursday, April 21, 2016

11:00 a.m. EDT

Offices

Table of Reed Smith LLP

225 Fifth Ave.

Pittsburgh, PA 15222

If you would like to attend the Annual Meeting, you must obtain an admission ticket in

advance as described in more detail in the Proxy Statement.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

M99329-P72407-Z67086

THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

April 21, 2016 11:00 a.m. EDT

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on April 21, 2016.

The shares of stock held in your account or in a dividend reinvestment account will be voted as you specify on the reverse side.

If no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted “FOR” Proposals 1, 2, 4 and 5, and “1 YEAR” on Proposal 3.

By signing the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint James J. Savina and Chris H. Anderson and each or either of them with full power of substitution, to vote the shares on the matters shown on the reverse side of this card and any other matters which may come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof. In addition, if you are a current or former Kraft Heinz employee and have investments in the Kraft Heinz Stock Fund(s) of the Kraft Foods Group, Inc. Thrift/TIP 401(k) Plans and/or the Kraft Canada Inc. Pension and Savings Program, on February 22, 2016, you are directing the plan(s) trustee(s) how to vote the shares allocated to your account(s). If your voting instructions are not received by 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 18, 2016, as described in the Proxy Statement, the trustee(s) will vote the shares allocated to your Kraft Heinz Stock Fund account(s) in the same proportion as the respective plan shares for which voting instructions have been received, unless contrary to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). If you are a participant in the Altria Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan for Hourly Employees, the Altria Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan for Salaried Employees, the Philip Morris International Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan or the MillerCoors LLC Employees’ Retirement & Savings Plan, you are directing those plans’ trustees how to vote the shares allocated to your account(s). If your voting instructions are not received by 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 18, 2016, the trustees will vote the shares allocated to your account(s) in the same proportion as the respective plan shares for which voting instructions have been received, unless contrary to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

Address changes/comments: 

(If you noted any address changes/comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side

Contents

proxycard002.jpg